Deliberation, dialogue or dissemination: Changing objectives in the communication of science and technology in Denmark

Science Communication in the World: Practices, Theories and Trends

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 95-108

  Horst, Maja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anti elitism; Branding; Consensus conferences; Danish board of technology; Danish council of ethics; Deficit model; Deliberation; Grundtvig; Institutionalization; Research managers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956530533     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4279-6_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Agersnap, T. (1992). Konstruktiv teknologi. Kpbenhavn: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
2. Agersnap, T., Jakobsen, G., & Kempinski, J. (1984). Konsensuskonferenceridanmark. Kpbenhavn: DSI.
3. Andersen, I., & Jger, B. (1999). Danish participatory models. Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 331-340.
4. Cronberg, T. (1995). Do marginal voices shape technology? In J. Simon & J. Durant (Eds.), Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe (pp. 125-134). London: Science Museum.
5. Einsiedel, E. F., Jels0e, E., & Breck, T. (2001). Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 83-98.
6. Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. New York: Plenum Trade.
7. Grundtvig, N. F. S. (1839). ‘Er Lyset for de Lmrde Blot’ [Is the light just for the learned?]. The Danish Folk High School Song Book (17th ed.), song number 462, Odense: Foreningens Forlag.
8. Horst, M. (2008). In search of dialogue: Staging science communication in consensus conferences. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 259-274). New York: Springer.
9. Horst, M. (under review) The discipline, the organization, or science itself? Working paper, unpublished.
10. Horst, M., & Irwin, A. (2010). Nations at ease with radical knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(1), 105-126.
11. Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (Eds.). (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Joss, S., & Durant, J. (1995). Public participation in science. London: Science Museum.
13. Kappel, K., & Lykkeskov, A. (2007). Etik i tiden: 20 ar med det etiske rad. Det Etiske Rad.
14. Kluwer, L. (1995). Consensus conferences at the Danish Board of Technology. In S. Joss & J. Durant (Eds.), Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe (pp. 41-49). London: Science Museum.
15. Knudsen, T. (2001). Da demokrati blev til folkestyre: Dansk demokratihistorie I. Akademisk Forlag A/S.
16. Koch, L., & Horst, M. (2007). Fra almenhed til pluralitet: Forestillinger om konsensusskabelse i det etiske rads historie. In K. Kappel & A. Lykkeskov (Eds.), Etik i tiden: 20 ar med det etiske rad (pp. 143-166). K0benhavn: Det Etiske Rad.
17. Korsgaard, O. (2004). Kampen omfolket—et dannelsesperspektivpa dansk historie gennem 500 ar. K0benhavn: Gyldendal.
18. Kragh, H., Kjmrgaard, P. C., Nielsen, H., & Nielsen, K. H. (2008). Science in Denmark: A thousand-year history. Arhus: Aarhus University Press.
19. Lassen, J. (2004). Changing modes ofbiotechnology governance in denmark. STAGE discussion paper 3. Retrieved 13 Nov 2011 from http://www.stage-research.net/STAGE/documents/3_BiotechnologyGovernanceDK_final.pdf
20. Lund, A. B., & Horst, M. (1999). Den offentlige debat—mal, middel eller mantra. K0benhavn: Fremad.
21. Mejlgaard, N. (2009). The trajectory of scientific citizenship in Denmark: Changing balances between public competence and public participation. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 483-496.
22. Rasmussen, A. F. (2002). Prime minister’s New Year’s speech. Retrieved 13 Nov 2011 from http://www.stm.dk/Index/dokumenter.asp/_p_7354.html
23. SCST (House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology). (2000). Science and society. London: House of Lords.
24. Seifert, F. (2006). Local steps in an international career: A Danish-style consensus conference in Austria. Public Understanding of Science, 15(1), 73-88.
25. STAGE (Science, Technology and Governance in Europe). (2005). Website and final report. STAGE network. Retrieved 13 Nov 2011 from http://www.stage-research.net/STAGE/index. html
26. Suine, K., & Mejlgaard, N. (2001). Public understanding of science—Perceptions of and attitudes toward biotechnology in Denmark. Aarhus: Analyseinstitut for forskning.
27. Videnskabsministeren. (2011). Universitetsloven. Retsinformation. Retrieved 13 Nov 2011 from https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/r0710.aspx?id=137835
28. Videnskabsministeriet. (2004). Forsk og fortzl. Ministeriet for Videnskab, Teknologi og Udvikling.
29. Vikkelso, S. (2003). Electronic patient records and medical practice reorganization of roles, responsibilities, and risks. K0benhavn: Samfundslitteratur.