Phrase type sensitive tensor indexing model for semantic composition

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 2195-2201

  Zhao, Yu ^a   Liu, Zhiyuan ^a   Sun, Maosong ^a,b  

^a TSINGHUA NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Language Competence   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS; TENSORS;

COMPOSITION METHOD; COMPOSITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; COMPOSITIONAL SEMANTICS; HIGH FREQUENCY HF; MULTIPLICATIVE MODEL; SEMANTIC COMPOSITION; STATE OF THE ART; VECTOR OPERATIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84959929426     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bai, B.; Weston, J.; Grangier, D.; Collobert, R.; Sadamasa, K.; Qi, Y.; Cortes, C; and Mohri, M. 2009. Polynomial semantic indexing. In NIPS, 64-72.
2. Baroni, M., and Lenci, A. 2010. Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics 36(4):673-721.
3. Baroni, M., and Zamparelli, R. 2010. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 1183-1193. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Blacoe, W., and Lapata, M. 2012. A comparison of vector-based representations for semantic composition. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 546-556. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Chen, J., and Saad, Y 2009. On the tensor svd and the optimal low rank orthogonal approximation of tensors. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 30(4): 1709-1734.
6. Clark, S., and Pulman, S. 2007. Combining symbolic and distributional models of meaning. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Quantum Interaction, 52-55.
7. Clark, S.; Coecke, B.; and Sadrzadeh, M. 2008. A compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of the Second Quantum Interaction Symposium (QI-2008), 133-140.
8. Clarke, D. 2012. A context-theoretic framework for compo-sitionality in distributional semantics. Computational Linguistics 38(1):41-71.
9. Coecke, B.; Sadrzadeh, M.; and Clark, S. 2010. Mathematical foundations for a compositional distributional model of meaning. CoRR abs/1003.4394.
10. Collobert, R., and Weston, J. 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th International conference on Machine Learning, 160-167. ACM.
11. Erk, K., and Padó, S. 2008. A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 897-906. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Grefenstette, E., and Sadrzadeh, M. 2011. Experimental support for a categorical compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 1394-1404. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Grefenstette, E.; Dinu, G.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Sadrzadeh, M.; and Baroni, M. 2013. Multi-step regression learning for compositional distributional semantics. IWCS.
14. Maas, A. L.; Daly, R. E.; Pham. P. T.; Huang, D.; Ng, A. Y; and Potts, C. 2011. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, 142-150. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Marcili, M.; Bentivogli, L.; Baroni, M.; Bernardi, R.; Menini, S.; and Zamparelli, R. 2014. Semeval-2014 task 1: Evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models on full sentences through semantic relatedness and textual entailment. SemEval-2014.
16. Mikolov, T.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G.; and Dean, J. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1301.3781.
17. Mikolov, T.; Yih, W.-t.; and Zweig, G. 2013. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 746-751.
18. Mitchell, J., and Lapata, M. 2010. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive science 34(8).T388-1429.
19. Socher, R.; Huang, E. H.; Pennington, J.; Ng, A. Y.; and Manning, C. D. 2011a. Dynamic pooling and unfolding recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection. In NIPS, volume 24, 801-809.
20. Socher, R.; Pennington, J.; Huang, E. H.; Ng, A. Y; and Manning, C. D. 2011b. Semi-supervised recursive autoencoders for predicting sentiment distributions. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 151-161. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Socher, R.; Huval. B.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2012. Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL, 1201-1211.
22. Socher, R.; Bauer, J.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2013a. Parsing with compositional vector grammars. In Proceedings of ACL.
23. Socher, R.; Chen, D.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. 2013b. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In Proceedings of NIPS, 926-934.
24. Socher, R.; Perelygin, A.; Wu, J. Y; Chuang, J.; Manning, C. D.; Ng, A. Y; and Potts, C. 2013c. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 1631-1642.
25. Toutanova, K.; Klein, D.; Manning, C. D.; and Singer, Y. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of ACL-HLT, 173-180.
26. Turney, P., and Pantel, P. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of artificial intelligence research 37(1): 141-188.
27. Yessenalina, A., and Cardie, C. 2011. Compositional matrix-space models for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 172-182.
28. Zanzotto, F. M.; Korkontzelos, I.; Fallucchi, E; and Man-andhar, S. 2010. Estimating linear models for compositional distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1263-1271.