A comparison of vector-based representations for semantic composition

EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 - 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 546-556

  Blacoe, William ^a   Lapata, Mirella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITIONAL METHOD; LARGE CORPORA; PARAMETER LEARNING; SEMANTIC COMPOSITION; SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE; TRAINING CORPUS; VECTOR-BASED REPRESENTATIONS;

LINGUISTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870673011     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Marco Baroni and Alessandro Lenci. 2010. Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4):673-721.
2. Marco Baroni and Roberto Zamparelli. 2010. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1183-1193, Cambridge, MA.
3. Jerome R. Bellegarda. 2000. Exploiting latent semantic information in statistical language modeling. Proceedings of the Institute of of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 88(8):1279-1296.
4. Yoshua Bengio. 2001. Neural net language models. Scholarpedia, 3(1):3881.
5. Stephen Clark, Bob Coecke, and Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh. 2008. A compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of the 2nd Quantum Interaction Symposium, pages 133-140, Oxford, UK.
6. Daoud Clarke. 2012. A context-theoretic framework for compositionality in distributional semantics. Computational Linguistics, 38(1):41-71.
7. J Cohen and P Cohen. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Ronan Collobert and Jason Weston. 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 160-167, New York, NY. ACM.
9. Dipanjan Das and Noah A. Smith. 2009. Paraphrase identification as probabilistic quasi-synchronous recognition. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 468-476, Suntec, Singapore.
10. G. Denhire and B. Lemaire. 2004. A computational model of children's semantic memory. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 297-302, Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.
11. Bill Dolan, Chris Quirk, and Chris Brockett. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 350-356, Geneva, Switzerland. COLING.
12. Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. Liblinear: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871-1874.
13. Samuel Fernando and Mark Stevenson. 2008. A semantic similarity approach to paraphrase detection. Technology.
14. Lev Finkelstein, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Yossi Matias, Ehud Rivlin, Zach Solan, Gadi Wolfman, and Eytan Ruppin. 2001. Placing search in context: the concept revisited. In WWW, pages 406-414.
15. Peter Foltz, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer. 1998. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Process, 15:285-307.
16. Edward Grefenstette and Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh. 2011a. Experimental support for a categorical compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1394-1404, Edinburgh, Scotland.
17. Edward Grefenstette and Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh. 2011b. Experimenting with transitive verbs in a DisCoCat. In Proceedings of the GEMS 2011 Workshop on GEometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, pages 62-66, Edinburgh, UK.
18. Gregory Grefenstette. 1994. Explorations in Automatic Thesaurus Discovery. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
19. Thomas L. Griffiths, Mark Steyvers, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2007. Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114(2):211-244.
20. Aminul Islam and Diana Inkpen. 2007. Semantic similarity of short texts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Borovets, Bulgaria.
21. Walter Kintsch. 2001. Predication. Cognitive Science, 25(2):173-202.
22. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
23. T. K. Landauer and S. T. Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2):211-240.
24. Scott McDonald. 2000. Environmental Determinants of Lexical Processing Effort. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
25. Rada Mihalcea, Courtney Corley, and Carlo Strapparava, 2006. Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity, pages 775-780. AAAI Press.
26. Jeff Mitchell and Mirella Lapata. 2010. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 38(8):1388-1429.
27. Jeff Mitchell. 2011. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
28. Tony A. Plate. 1995. Holographic reduced representations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6(3):623-641.
29. Long Qiu, Min-Yen Kan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2006. Paraphrase recognition via dissimilarity significance classification. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 18-26, Sydney, Australia.
30. Vasile Rus, Philip M. McCarthy, Mihai C. Lintean, Danielle S. McNamara, and Arthur C. Graesser. 2008. Paraphrase identification with lexico-syntactic graph subsumption. In David Wilson and H. Chad Lane, editors, Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pages 201-206. AAAI Press.
31. Hinrich Schütze. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1):97-124.
32. Paul Smolensky. 1990. Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46:159-216.
33. Richard Socher, Eric H. Huang, Jeffrey Pennin, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher D. Manning. 2011a. Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoen-coders for Paraphrase Detection. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24, pages 801-809. Granada, Spain.
34. Richard Socher, Jeffrey Pennington, Eric H. Huang, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher D. Manning. 2011b. Semi-supervised recursive autoencoders for predicting sentiment distributions. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 151-161, Edinburgh, Scotland.
35. Joseph Turian, Lev Ratinov, and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Word representations: a simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 384-394, Uppsala, Sweden.
36. Peter D. Turney. 2006. Similarity of semantic relations. Computational Linguistics, 32(3):379-416.
37. Stephen Wan, Mark Dras, Robert Dale, and Cecile Paris. 2006. Using dependency-based features to take the "para-farce" out of paraphrase. In Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Workshop 2006, pages 131-138, Sydney, Australia.