Broad-coverage CCG semantic parsing with AMR

Conference Proceedings - EMNLP 2015: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1699-1710

  Artzi, Yoav ^a,b   Lee, Kenton ^b   Zettlemoyer, Luke ^b  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS; FORMAL LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS;

F1 SCORES; FACTOR GRAPHS; GRAMMAR INDUCTION; SEMANTIC PARSING; SINGLE MODELS; STATE OF THE ART; TARGET APPLICATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84959878086     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d15-1198     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Artzi, Y., Das, D., and Petrov, S. (2014). Learning compact lexicons for CCG semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
2. Artzi, Y. and Zettlemoyer, L. S. (2011). Bootstrapping semantic parsers from conversations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
3. Artzi, Y. and Zettlemoyer, L. S. (2013a). UW SPF: The University of Washington Semantic Parsing Framework.
4. Artzi, Y. and Zettlemoyer, L. S. (2013b). Weakly supervised learning of semantic parsers for mapping instructions to actions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1(1):49-62.
5. Banarescu, L., Bonial, C, Cai, S., Georgescu, M., Griffitt, K., Hermjakob, U., Knight, K., Koehn, P., Palmer, M., and Schneider, N. (2013). Abstract meaning representation for sembanking. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop.
6. Bos, J. (2008). Wide-coverage semantic analysis with Boxer. In Proceedings of the Conference on Semantics in Text Processing.
7. Cai, Q. and Yates, A. (2013). Semantic parsing Freebase: Towards open-domain semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics.
8. Cai, S. and Knight, K. (2013). Smatch: an evaluation metric for semantic feature structures. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics.
9. Chen, D. (2012). Fast online lexicon learning for grounded language acquisition. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Chen, D. L. and Mooney, R. J. (2011). Learning to interpret natural language navigation instructions from observations. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
11. Clark, S. and Curran, J. R. (2007). Widecoverage efficient statistical parsing with CCG and log-linear models. Computational Linguistics, 33(4):493-552.
12. Clarke, J., Goldwasser, D., Chang, M., and Roth, D. (2010). Driving semantic parsing from the world's response. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning.
13. Collins, M. and Roark, B. (2004). Incremental parsing with the perceptron algorithm. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Duchi, J., Hazan, E., and Singer, Y (2011). Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, pages 2121-2159.
15. Flanigan, J., Thomson, S., Carbonell, J., Dyer, C, and Smith, N. A. (2014). A discriminative graph-based parser for the Abstract Meaning Representation. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics.
16. Goldwasser, D. and Roth, D. (2011). Learning from natural instructions. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
17. Hockenmaier, J. and Bisk, Y (2010). Normalform parsing for combinatory categorial grammars with generalized composition and typeraising. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
18. Hockenmaier, J. and Steedman, M. (2007). CCG-Bank: A corpus of CCG derivations and dependency structures extracted from the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, pages 355-396.
19. Honnibal, M., Curran, J. R., and Bos, J. (2010). Rebanking CCGBank for Improved NP Interpretation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Jones, B., Andreas, J., Bauer, D., Hermann, K. M., and Knight, K. (2012). Semantics-based machine translation with hyperedge replacement grammars. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
21. Krishnamurthy, J. and Mitchell, T. (2012). Weakly supervised training of semantic parsers. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning.
22. Krishnamurthy, J. and Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Learning a compositional semantics for Freebase with an open predicate vocabulary. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3.
23. Kwiatkowski, T., Choi, E., Artzi, Y., and Zettlemoyer, L. S. (2013). Scaling semantic parsers with on-the-fly ontology matching. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
24. Kwiatkowski, T., Goldwater, S., Zettlemoyer, L. S., and Steedman, M. (2012). A probabilistic model of syntactic and semantic acquisition from child-directed utterances and their meanings. Proceedings of the Conference of the European Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics.
25. Kwiatkowski, T., Zettlemoyer, L. S., Goldwater, S., and Steedman, M. (2010). Inducing probabilistic CCG grammars from logical form with higher-order unification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
26. Kwiatkowski, T., Zettlemoyer, L. S., Goldwater, S., and Steedman, M. (2011). Lexical generalization in CCG grammar induction for semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
27. Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., and Pereira, F. (2001). Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.
28. Lewis, M. and Steedman, M. (2013). Combined distributional and logical semantics. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1.
29. ∗ CCG parsing with a supertag-factored model. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
30. Liang, P., Jordan, M., and Klein, D. (2011). Learning dependency-based compositional semantics. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. Liu, F, Flanigan, J., Thomson, S., Sadeh, N., and Smith, N. A. (2015). Toward abstractive summarization using semantic representations. In Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Linguistics.
32. Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bernard, S. J., and McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
33. Muresan, S. (2011). Learning for deep language understanding. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
34. Ng, V. (2010). Supervised noun phrase preference research: The first fifteen years. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics.
35. Pan, X., Cassidy, T., Hermjakob, U., Ji, H., and Knight, K. (2015). Unsupervised entity linking with Abstract Meaning Representation. In Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Linguistics.
36. Poon, H. (2013). Grounded unsupervised semantic parsing. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
37. Pourdamghani, N., Gao, Y., Hermjakob, U., and Knight, K. (2014). Aligning English strings with Abstract Meaning Representation graphs. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
38. Ratinov, L. and Roth, D. (2009). Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning.
39. Reddy, S., Lapata, M., and Steedman, M. (2014). Large-scale semantic parsing without questionanswer pairs. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2.
40. Steedman, M. (1996). Surface Structure and Interpretation. The MIT Press.
41. Steedman, M. (2000). The Syntactic Process. The MIT Press.
42. Steedman, M. (2011). Taking Scope. The MIT Press.
43. Wang, C, Xue, N., Pradhan, S., and Pradhan, S. (2015). A transition-based algorithm for AMR parsing. In Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Linguistics.
44. Wong, Y and Mooney, R. J. (2007). Learning synchronous grammars for semantic parsing with lambda calculus. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
45. Zelle, J. and Mooney, R. J. (1996). Learning to parse database queries using inductive logic programming. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
46. Zettlemoyer, L. S. and Collins, M. (2005). Learning to map sentences to logical form: Structured classification with probabilistic categorial grammars. In Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.