Does oral carbohydrate supplementation improve labour outcome? A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 510-517

  Malin, G L ^a,b   Bugg, G J ^a   Thornton, J ^a   Taylor, M A ^c   Grauwen, N ^d   Devlieger, R ^d   Kardel, K R ^e   Kubli, M ^f   Tranmer, J E ^g   Jones, N W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^f ASHFORD AND ST PETER'S HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^g QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Carbohydrates; individual patient data meta analysis; labour outcome

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; PLACEBO; CARBOHYDRATE DIET;

APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CESAREAN SECTION; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; LENGTH OF LABOR; META ANALYSIS; OBSTETRIC PROCEDURE; PRIMIGRAVIDA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING; VOMITING; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ADULT; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; DIETARY SUPPLEMENT; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; METABOLISM; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84959449712     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13728     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Dunsworth HM, Warrener AG, Deacon T, Ellison PT, Pontzer H. Metabolic hypothesis for human altriciality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 15212-6.
2. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology, 12 edn. Oxford, UK: Saunders/Elsevier, 2010.
3. Toohill J, Soong B, Fleandy V. Interventions for ketosis in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(3): CD004230.
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. 2014. [www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190 ]. Accessed 12 February 2015.
5. Health and Social Care Information Centre. NHS maternity statistics, England 2012/2013. [www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB12744 ]. Accessed 12 February 2015.
6. Birthplace in England collaborative group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011; 343: d7400.
7. Mendelson C. The aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1946; 52: 191-206.
8. Singata M, Tranmer J, Gyte GM. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1): CD003930.
9. O'Sullivan G, Liu B, Hart D, Seed P, Shennan A. Effect of food intake during labour on obstetric outcome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009; 338: b784.
10. Bennett JR, Kehoe MP. Marathon fueling techniques: physiologic understanding and a proposed intake schedule. Strength Cond J 2008; 30: 56-65.
11. Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J, et al., Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 571-7.
12. Scheepers HC, Thans MC, de Jong PA, Essed GG, Kanhai HH. The effects of oral carbohydrate administration on fetal acid base balance. J Perinatal Med 2002; 30: 400-4.
13. Scheepers HC, Thans MC, de Jong PA, Essed GG, Le Cessie S, Kanhai HH. A double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled study on the influence of carbohydrate solution intake during labour. BJOG 2002; 109: 178-81.
14. Kubli M, Scrutton M, Seed P, O'Sullivan G. An evaluation of isotonic 'sports drinks' during labour. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 404-8.
15. Ciura N, Vandevelde M, Offeciers H, Jorissen G, Corthout C, Devlieger R. The effect of isotonic drinks during labour on pregnancy outcome: a randomised controlled trial. Reprod Sci 2012; 19 (3 Suppl): 305A.
16. Tranmer JE, Hodnett ED, Hannah ME, Stevens BJ. The effect of unrestricted oral carbohydrate intake on labor progress. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2005; 34: 319-28.
17. Kardel KR, Henriksen T, Iversen PO. No effect of energy supply during childbirth on delivery outcomes in nulliparous women: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 30: 248-52.
18. Rahmani R, Khakbazan Z, Yavari P, Granmayeh M, Yavari L. Effect of oral carbohydrate intake on labor progress: randomized controlled trial. Iran J Public Health 2012; 41: 59-66.
19. Higgins JPT, Green S, (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. [www.cochrane-handbook.org ]. Accessed 10 March 2014.
20. Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Thornton JG, Jones NW. What is the effect on labour outcomes of oral carbohydrate supplementation in the latent or early active phase? A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014014847 2014. [www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display-record.asp?ID = CRD42014014847 ]. Accessed 09 January 2015.
21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
22. Thomas D, Radji S, Benedetti A. Systematic review of methods for individual patient data meta-analysis with binary outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 79.
23. Deeks JJ. Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1575-600.
24. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Rothstein H. Meta-analysis fixed effect vs random effects. 2007. [www.meta-analysis.com ]. Accessed 20 December 2014.
25. Higgins JT. Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37: 1158-60.
26. Simonet T. Evaluation of the benefits of glucose drinks during childbirth (SOLISO). 2009, US National Institutes of Health (NCT01022697) ClinicalTrials.gov. [www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01022697 ]. Accessed 29 December 2014.
27. Dávila-Expósito A, Gregori-Arias R, Sebastià-Calvo MA, Ferret-López L, Bravo-Remírez I, Telletxea-Vertiz ME, et al., The influence of isotonic drinks on foetal, neonatal and maternal well-being (in Spanish). Matronas Prof 2009; 10: 11-5.
28. Canadian Dietetic Association and American Dietetic Association. Physical fitness and athletic performance: joint position paper. J Am Diet Assoc 1993; 93: 691-6.
29. Apgar V, James LS. Further observations on the newborn scoring system. Am J Dis Child 1962; 104: 419-28.
30. Riley RD, Lambert PC, Abo-Zaid G. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ 2010; 340: c221.
31. Maganha e Melo CR, Peracoli JC. Measuring the energy spent by parturient women in fasting and in ingesting caloric replacement (Honey). Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2007; 15: 612-7.
32. Maughan RJ, Burke LM. Sports Nutrition, 1st edn. Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Vol. 1. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2002.
33. Dencker A, Berg M, Bergqvist L., Lilja H. Identification of latent phase factors associated with active labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 1034-9.
34. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, et al., Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 961-9.
35. Amann M, Dempsey JA. Locomotor muscle fatigue modifies central motor drive in healthy humans and imposes a limitation to exercise performance. J Physiol 2008; 586: 161-73.
36. Lewis P. Is ketosis in labour pathological? Pract Midwife 2007; 10: 47-51.
37. Fowden AL, Moore T. Maternal-fetal resource allocation: co-operation and conflict. Placenta 2012; 33 (Suppl 2): e11-5.