Patient engagement in the process of planning and designing outpatient care improvements at the Veterans Administration Health-care System: findings from an online expert panel

Health Expectations

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 130-145

  Khodyakov, Dmitry ^a   Stockdale, Susan E ^b,c   Smith, Nina ^b   Booth, Marika ^a   Altman, Lisa ^b,d   Rubenstein, Lisa V ^a,b  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ExpertLens; modified Delphi; online expert panel; patient engagement; quality improvement; VA

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; DELPHI STUDY; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

AMBULATORY CARE; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 84959378506     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12444     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Reynolds A. Patient-centered care. Radiologic Technology, 2009; 81: 133–147.
2. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs, 2013; 32: 223–231.
3. Perlin JB, Kolodner RM, Roswell RH. The veterans health administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. The American Journal of Managed Care, 2004; 10(Pt 2): 828–836.
4. Van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ, Grit KJ. Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model. Health Expectations, 2009; 13: 73–85.
5. Scholle SH, Torda P, Peikes D, Han E, Genevro J. Engaging Patients and Families in the Medical Home. Rockville, MD: AHRQ Publication N 10-0083-EF; 2010.
6. Han E, Scholle SH, Morton S, Bechtel C, Kessler R. Survey shows that fewer than a third of patient-centered medical home practices engage patients in quality improvement. Health Affairs, 2013; 32: 368–375.
7. Boivin A, Lehoux P, Burgers J, Grol R. What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation. Milbank Quarterly, 2014; 92: 319–350.
8. Forbat L, Cayless S, Knighting K, Cornwell J, Kearney N. Engaging patients in health care: an empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and action. Patient Education and Counseling, 2009; 74: 84–90.
9. Angel L. Starting and Sustaining a Patient Advisory Board: Patient Liaison Handbook. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco General Hospital, 2014 Contract.
10. Becker DR, Harris CC, McLaughlin WJ, Nielsen EA. A participatory approach to social impact assessment: the interactive community forum. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2003; 23: 367–382.
11. Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2006; 15: 307–310.
12. McDonald KM, Bryce CL, Graber ML. The patient is in: patient involvement strategies for diagnostic error mitigation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2013; 22 (Suppl 2): ii33–ii39.
13. Institute of Medicine. To err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington D.C.: Institute of Medicine, 1999 Contract.
14. Davis RE, Jacklin R, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA. Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement? Health Expectations, 2007; 10: 259–267.
15. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 2006; 7: 312–323.
16. Khodyakov D, Stockdale S, Jones F et al. An exploration of the effect of community engagement in research on perceived outcomes of partnered mental health services projects. Society and Mental Health, 2011; 1: 185–199.
17. Conklin A, Morris Z, Nolte E. What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy?: results of a systematic scoping review. Health Expectations, 2015; 18: 153–165.
18. Armstrong N, Herbert G, Aveling EL, Dixon-Woods M, Martin G. Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement. Health Expectations, 2013; 16: e36–e47.
19. Gold SKT, Abelson J, Charles CA. From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 195–209.
20. Attree P, Morris S, Payne S, Vaughan S, Hinder S. Exploring the influence of service user involvement on health and social care services for cancer. Health Expectations, 2011; 14: 48–58.
21. Department of Veterans Affairs. fy 2014–2020 strategic plan. In: Affairs DoV, editor.; 2013.
22. Department of Veterans Affairs. Blueprint for excellence In: Administration VH, editor.; 2014.
23. Coronado GD, Sanchez J, Petrik A, Kapka T, DeVoe J, Green B. Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. Journal of Cancer Education, 2014; 29: 86–90.
24. Leonhardt KK, Bonin D, Pagel P. Partners in safety: implementing a community-based patient safety advisory council. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 2006; 105: 54–59.
25. Kinsinger LS, Van Riper J, Straits-Troster K. Advocacy for veterans within the veterans health administration. North Carolina Medical Journal, 2009; 70: 159–162.
26. Charles C, DeMaio S. Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1993; 18: 881–904.
27. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stock R, Tusler M. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Services Research, 2007; 42: 1443–1463.
28. Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 1996; 13: 522–526.
29. Khodyakov D, Hempel S, Rubenstein L et al. Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011; 11: 174.
30. Dalal SR, Khodyakov D, Srinivasan R, Straus SG, Adams J. Expertlens: a system for eliciting opinions from a large pool of non-collocated experts with diverse knowledge. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2011; 78: 1426–1444.
31. Rowe G, Gammack JG. Promise and perils of electronic public engagement. Science and Public Policy, 2004; 31: 39–54.
32. Claassen CA, Pearson JL, Khodyakov D et al. Reducing the burden of suicide in the U.S.: the aspirational research goals of the national action alliance for suicide prevention research prioritization task force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2014; 47: 309–314.
33. Khodyakov D, Savitsky TD, Dalal S. Collaborative learning framework for online stakeholder engagement. Health Expectations, 2015. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi:10.1111/hex.12383.
34. Rubenstein L, Khodyakov D, Hempel S et al. How can we recognize continuous quality improvement? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2014; 26: 6–15.
35. Barber C, Marshall D, Alvarez N et al. Development of cardiovascular quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis: results from an international expert panel using a novel online process. The Journal of Rheumatology, 2015; 42: 1548–1555.
36. Barber C, Marshall D, Mosher D et al. Development of system-level performance measures for evaluation of models of care for inflammatory arthritis in canada. The Journal of Rheumatology, 2016; 43: 1–11.
37. Barber C, Patel JN, Woodhouse L et al. Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 2015; 17: 1–12.
38. Khodyakov D, Mikesell L, Schraiber R, Booth M, Bromley E. On using ethical principles of community-engaged research in translational science. Translational Research, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2015.12.008.
39. Hughes R, Huby M. The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2002; 37: 382–386.
40. Finch J. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 1987; 21: 105–114.
41. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2001. Contract No.: MR-1269-DG-XII/RE.
42. Basger BJ, Chen TF, Moles RJ. Validation of prescribing appropriateness criteria for older Australians using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. BMJ Open, 2012; 2:e001431: 1–20.
43. Litva A, Coast J, Donovan J et al. ‘The public is too subjective’: public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. Social Science & Medicine, 2002; 54: 1825–1837.
44. Boyer L, Francois P, Doutre E, Weil G, Labarere J. Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2006; 18: 359–364.
45. Nathan S, Harris E, Kemp L, Harris-Roxas B. Health service staff attitudes to community representatives on committees. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2006; 20: 551–559.
46. Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 2014; 14: 89.
47. Reeves R, Seccombe I. Do patient surveys work? The influence of a national survey programme on local quality-improvement initiatives. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2008; 17: 437–441.
48. Nathan S, Braithwaite J, Stephenson N. The scope and impact of community participation. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2014; 28: 405–421.
49. Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal, 1995; 311: 376–380.