What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation

Milbank Quarterly

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 319-350

  Boivin, Antoine ^a   Lehoux, Pascale ^b   Burgers, Jako ^c   Grol, Richard ^d  

^a HÔPITAL CHARLES LEMOYNE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c Dutch College of General Practitioners   (Canada)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

patient participation; policymaking; qualitative research; quality of health care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VIDEORECORDING;

PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLICYMAKING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; CANADA; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; FEMALE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MALE; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC OPINION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84901925136     PISSN: 0887378X     EISSN: 14680009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12060     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Balint M., The Doctor, His Patient and the Illness. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 1964.
2. Engel GL,. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. May 8, 1977; 196 (4286): 129-136.
3. Stewart RE, Vroegop S, Kamps GB, van der Werf GT, Meyboom-de Jong B,. Factors influencing adherence to guidelines in general practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. Summer 2003; 19 (3): 546-554.
4. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K,. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002; 288 (14): 1775-1779.
5. Coulter A,. Do patients want a choice and does it work ? BMJ. 2010; 341: c4989.
6. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011: CD001431.
7. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Fries JF,. Long-term randomized controlled trials of tailored-print and small-group arthritis self-management interventions. Med Care. April 2004; 42 (4): 346-354.
8. Florin D, Dixon J,. Public involvement in health care. BMJ. January 17, 2004; 328 (7432): 159-161.
9. McCarthy D, Blumenthal D,. Stories from the sharp end: case studies in safety improvement. Milbank Q. 2006; 84 (1): 165-200.
10. Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, Eccles MP, Wensing M,. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007; 85 (1): 93-138.
11. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O,. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004; 82 (4): 581-629.
12. Kuehn BM,. IOM sets out "gold standard" practices for creating guidelines, systematic reviews. JAMA. May 11, 2011; 305 (18): 1846-1848.
13. AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. AGREE Research Trust. 2001. http://www. agreetrust.org. Accessed July 10, 2007.
14. VanLare JM, Conway PH, Sox HC,. Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. March 18, 2010; 362 (11): 970-973.
15. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients' perspectives in HTA: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 26 (3): 334-340.
16. Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8 (15): 1-148.
17. Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J,. Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review. Health Policy. 2009; 91 (3): 219-228.
18. Pickard S, Sheaff R, Dowling B,. Exit, voice, governance and user-responsiveness: the case of English primary care trusts. Soc Sci Med. July 2006; 63 (2): 373-383.
19. Milewa T, Valentine J, Calnan M,. Community participation and citizenship in British health care planning: narratives of power and involvement in the changing welfare state. Sociol Health & Illness. 1999; 21 (4): 445-465.
20. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual & Saf Health Care. October 2010; 19 (5): e22.
21. Martin GP,. "Ordinary people only": knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociol Health & Illness. January 2008; 30 (1): 35-54.
22. Church J, Saunders D, Wanke M, Pong R, Spooner C, Dorgan M,. Citizen participation in health decision-making: past experience and future prospects. J Public Health Policy. 2002; 23 (1): 12-32.
23. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. November 30, 2002; 325 (7375): 1263.
24. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD,. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 (3).
25. Legare F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making. September 29, 2011; 31 (6): E45-74.
26. Conklin A, Morris ZS, Nolte E,. Involving the Public in Healthcare Policy. Cambridge, England: RAND Europe; December 13, 2010.
27. Contandriopoulos D,. A sociological perspective on public participation in health care. Soc Sci Med. February 2004; 58 (2): 321-330.
28. Coulter A, Ellins J,. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. July 7, 2007; 335 (7609): 24-27.
29. Abelson J, Montessanti S, Li K, Gauvin F-P, Martin E,; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Effective strategies for interactive public engagement in the development of healthcare policies and programs. http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/Libraries/Commissioned-Research-Reports/ Abelson-EN-FINAL.sflb.ashx. Published December 2010. Accessed March 12, 2014.
30. Abelson J, Gauvin FP,; Canadian Policy Research Networks. Assessing the impacts of public participation: concepts, evidence and policy implications. Research Report P06. March 2006. http://www.cprn.org/documents/42669-fr.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2014.
31. Patton MQ,. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997.
32. Hulscher MEJL, Laurant MGH, Grol RPTM,. Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual & Saf Health Care. March 2003; 12 (1): 40-46.
33. Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Burgers J, Grol R,. Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. February 2014; 9: 24.
34. Rowe G, Frewer LJ,. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol & Hum Values. 2000; 25 (1): 3.
35. Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P,. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1995.
36. Arnstein S,. A ladder of citizen participation in the USA. J Am Inst Planners. 1969; 35 (4): 216-224.
37. Tritter JQ, McCallum A,. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. 2006; 76 (2): 156-168.
38. Wait S, Nolte E,. Public involvement policies in health: exploring their conceptual basis. Health Econ, Policy & Law. 2006; 1 (2): 149-162.
39. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L, et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect. March 2008; 11 (1): 72-84.
40. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C,. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. August 2002; 61 (2): 213-236.
41. Rowe G, Frewer LJ,. A Typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol & Hum Values. 2005; 30 (2): 251.
42. Fearon JD,. Deliberation as discussion. In:, Elster J, ed. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1998: 44-68.
43. Fischer F,. Policy deliberation: confronting subjectivity and emotional expression. Crit Policy Stud. 2009; 3 (3): 407-420.
44. Bohman J., Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996.
45. Davies C, Wetherell M, Barnett E,. Citizens at the Centre: Deliberative Participation in Healthcare Decisions. Bristol, England: Policy Press; 2006.
46. Chambers S,. Deliberative democratic theory. Ann Rev Polit Sci. 2003; 6 (1): 307-326.
47. Collins HM, Evans R,. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc Stud Sci. 2002; 32 (2): 235-296.
48. Martin GP,. Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. Soc Sci Med. December 2008; 67 (11): 1757-1765.
49. Barnes M, Newman J, Knops A, Sullivan H,. Constituting "the public" in public participation. Public Admin. July 2003; 81 (2): 379-399.
50. Harrison S, Mort M,. Which champions, which people? Public and user involvement in health care as a technology of legitimation. Soc Policy & Admin. April 1998; 32 (1): 60-70.
51. Parkinson J,. Hearing voices: negotiating representation claims in public deliberation. Br J Polit & Int Relations. August 2004; 6 (3): 370-388.
52. Pellizzoni L,. The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason. Br J Sociol. March 2001; 52 (1): 59-86.
53. Carpini MXD, Cook FL, Jacobs LR,. Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Ann Rev Polit Sci. 2004; 7 (1): 315-344.
54. Sunstein C,. The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos. 2002; 10 (2): 175-195.
55. Boivin A, Green J, van der Meulen J, Légaré F, Nolte E,. Why consider patients' preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guideline developers. Med Care. 2009; 47 (8): 908-915.
56. Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP,. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med. July 2003; 57 (2): 239-251.
57. Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Lacasse A, Burgers J, Grol R,. Target for improvement: a cluster randomized trial of public involvement in quality indicator prioritization (intervention development and study protocol). Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 45.
58. Green J, Thorogood N,. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London, England: Sage; 2004.
59. Martin GP,. Public deliberation in action: emotion, inclusion and exclusion in participatory decision making. Crit Soc Policy. May 1, 2012; 32 (2): 163-183.
60. Bucchi M, Neresini F,. Science and public participation. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch ME, Wajcman J, eds. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008: 449-472.
61. Edmond G, Mercer D,. Scientific literacy and the jury: reconsidering jury competence. Public Understanding of Sci. 1997; 6: 329-357.
62. Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Demers-Payette O, Boivin A,. Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics ? Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68: 2002-2009.
63. Fishkin J, Luskin R,. Deliberative polling and public consultation. Parliamentary Affairs. 2000.
64. Ryfe D,. Does deliberative democracy work ? Ann Rev Polit Sci. 2005; 8: 49-71.
65. Hendriks C,. Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: roles, tensions and incentives. Austral J Public Admin. April 2002; 61 (1): 64-75.
66. Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Abelson J,. The unbearable lightness of citizens with public deliberation processes. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 74 (12): 1843-1850.
67. Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Casebeer A, Martin E, Mackean G,. Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 64: 2115-2128.
68. Rowe G, Frewer LJ,. Evaluating public-participation exercises: a research agenda. Sci, Technol & Hum Values. 2004; 29 (4): 512.