메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 153-165

What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy?: Results of a systematic scoping review

Author keywords

Decision making; Health policy; Impact; Outcomes; Priority setting; Public involvement; Review

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES;

EID: 84925361953     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12038     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (127)

References (46)
  • 1
    • 41249099479 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public involvement policies in health: exploring their conceptual basis
    • Wait S, Nolte E. Public involvement policies in health: exploring their conceptual basis. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2006; 1: 149-162.
    • (2006) Health Economics, Policy and Law , vol.1 , pp. 149-162
    • Wait, S.1    Nolte, E.2
  • 2
    • 70349135968 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world
    • Tritter J. Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 275-287.
    • (2009) Health Expectations , vol.12 , pp. 275-287
    • Tritter, J.1
  • 4
    • 1642504232 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public involvement in health care
    • Florin D, Dixon J. Public involvement in health care. British Medical Journal, 2004; 328: 159-161.
    • (2004) British Medical Journal , vol.328 , pp. 159-161
    • Florin, D.1    Dixon, J.2
  • 7
    • 0037029314 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The medical profession, the public, and the government
    • Ham C, Alberti K. The medical profession, the public, and the government. British Medical Journal, 2002; 324: 838-842.
    • (2002) British Medical Journal , vol.324 , pp. 838-842
    • Ham, C.1    Alberti, K.2
  • 8
    • 0029941177 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?
    • Lenaghan J, New B, Mitchell E. Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries? BMJ, 1996; 312: 1591-1593.
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.312 , pp. 1591-1593
    • Lenaghan, J.1    New, B.2    Mitchell, E.3
  • 9
    • 0027312796 scopus 로고
    • Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience
    • Kitzhaber J. Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience. British Medical Journal, 1993; 307: 373-377.
    • (1993) British Medical Journal , vol.307 , pp. 373-377
    • Kitzhaber, J.1
  • 12
    • 77957712676 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Virtual special issue introduction: public participation in health policy in high income countries - a review of why, who, what, which, and where?
    • Tenbensel T. Virtual special issue introduction: public participation in health policy in high income countries - a review of why, who, what, which, and where? Social Science & Medicine, 2010; 71: 1537-1540.
    • (2010) Social Science & Medicine , vol.71 , pp. 1537-1540
    • Tenbensel, T.1
  • 13
    • 0037202686 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care
    • Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal, 2002; 325: 1263-1268.
    • (2002) British Medical Journal , vol.325 , pp. 1263-1268
    • Crawford, M.1    Rutter, D.2    Manley, C.3
  • 14
    • 67650459120 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review
    • Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J. Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review. Health Policy, 2009; 91: 219-228.
    • (2009) Health Policy , vol.91 , pp. 219-228
    • Mitton, C.1    Smith, N.2    Peacock, S.3    Evoy, B.4    Abelson, J.5
  • 17
    • 0038482449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: a cross-sectional survey of service users and providers
    • Crawford MJ, Aldridge T, Bhui K et al. User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: a cross-sectional survey of service users and providers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2003; 107: 410-414.
    • (2003) Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica , vol.107 , pp. 410-414
    • Crawford, M.J.1    Aldridge, T.2    Bhui, K.3
  • 18
    • 0036044136 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Primary Care Trusts involving the community: is community development the way forward?
    • Crowley P, Green J, Freake D, Drinkwater C. Primary Care Trusts involving the community: is community development the way forward? Journal of Management in Medicine, 2002; 5: 311-322.
    • (2002) Journal of Management in Medicine , vol.5 , pp. 311-322
    • Crowley, P.1    Green, J.2    Freake, D.3    Drinkwater, C.4
  • 19
    • 9644259319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Grounded citizens' juries: a tool for health activism?
    • Kashefi E, Mort M. Grounded citizens' juries: a tool for health activism? Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 290-302.
    • (2004) Health Expectations , vol.7 , pp. 290-302
    • Kashefi, E.1    Mort, M.2
  • 20
    • 0036690173 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Information, consultation or control: user involvement in mental health services in England at the turn of the century
    • Peck E, Gulliver P, Towel D. Information, consultation or control: user involvement in mental health services in England at the turn of the century. Journal of Mental Health, 2002; 11: 441-451.
    • (2002) Journal of Mental Health , vol.11 , pp. 441-451
    • Peck, E.1    Gulliver, P.2    Towel, D.3
  • 21
    • 0141785057 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does Deliberation Make a Difference? Results From a Citizens Panel Study of Health Goals Priority Setting
    • Abelson J, Eyles J, McLeod C, Collins P, McMullan C, Forest P. Does Deliberation Make a Difference? Results From a Citizens Panel Study of Health Goals Priority Setting Health Policy, 2003; 66: 95-106.
    • (2003) Health Policy , vol.66 , pp. 95-106
    • Abelson, J.1    Eyles, J.2    McLeod, C.3    Collins, P.4    McMullan, C.5    Forest, P.6
  • 22
    • 34147214767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study
    • Abelson J, Forest P, Eyles J, Casebeer A, Martin E, Mackean G. Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study. Social Science & Medicine, 2007; 64: 2115-2128.
    • (2007) Social Science & Medicine , vol.64 , pp. 2115-2128
    • Abelson, J.1    Forest, P.2    Eyles, J.3    Casebeer, A.4    Martin, E.5    Mackean, G.6
  • 23
    • 39049161476 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "We are all in this together": integrated health service plans in Ontario
    • Eliasoph H, Monaghan B, Beaudoin R et al. "We are all in this together": integrated health service plans in Ontario. Healthcare Quarterly, 2007; 10: 82-87.
    • (2007) Healthcare Quarterly , vol.10 , pp. 82-87
    • Eliasoph, H.1    Monaghan, B.2    Beaudoin, R.3
  • 24
    • 49749130471 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury
    • Menon D, Stafinski T. Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 282-293.
    • (2008) Health Expectations , vol.11 , pp. 282-293
    • Menon, D.1    Stafinski, T.2
  • 26
    • 24644511722 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choosing Healthplans All Together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources
    • Goold S, Biddle A, Klipp G, Hall C, Danis M. Choosing Healthplans All Together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2005; 30: 563-602.
    • (2005) Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , vol.30 , pp. 563-602
    • Goold, S.1    Biddle, A.2    Klipp, G.3    Hall, C.4    Danis, M.5
  • 27
    • 12444264803 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Promoting Participation in Organizational Decision Making by Clients with Severe Mental Illness
    • Linhorst DM, Eckert A, Hamilton G. Promoting Participation in Organizational Decision Making by Clients with Severe Mental Illness. Social Work, 2005; 50: 21-30.
    • (2005) Social Work , vol.50 , pp. 21-30
    • Linhorst, D.M.1    Eckert, A.2    Hamilton, G.3
  • 29
    • 34548621418 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benefits of working in partnership: a model
    • Boydell LR, Rugkåsa J. Benefits of working in partnership: a model. Critical Public Health, 2007; 17: 217-228.
    • (2007) Critical Public Health , vol.17 , pp. 217-228
    • Boydell, L.R.1    Rugkåsa, J.2
  • 30
    • 77249125959 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model
    • van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ, Grit KJ. Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model. Health Expectations, 2010; 13: 73-85.
    • (2010) Health Expectations , vol.13 , pp. 73-85
    • van de Bovenkamp, H.M.1    Trappenburg, M.J.2    Grit, K.J.3
  • 31
    • 34249288659 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • PartecipaSalute, an Italian project to involve lay people, patients' associations and scientific-medical representatives in the health debate
    • Mosconi P, Colombo C, Satolli R, Liberati A. PartecipaSalute, an Italian project to involve lay people, patients' associations and scientific-medical representatives in the health debate. Health Expectations, 2007; 10: 194-204.
    • (2007) Health Expectations , vol.10 , pp. 194-204
    • Mosconi, P.1    Colombo, C.2    Satolli, R.3    Liberati, A.4
  • 32
    • 44249090236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What should be given a priority-costly medications for relatively few people or inexpensive ones for many? The Health Parliament public consultation initiative in Israel
    • Guttman N, Shalev C, Kaplan G et al. What should be given a priority-costly medications for relatively few people or inexpensive ones for many? The Health Parliament public consultation initiative in Israel Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 177-188.
    • (2008) Health Expectations , vol.11 , pp. 177-188
    • Guttman, N.1    Shalev, C.2    Kaplan, G.3
  • 34
    • 28244467482 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A funny thing happened on the way to the forum? Reforming patient and public involvement in the NHS in England
    • Baggott R. A funny thing happened on the way to the forum? Reforming patient and public involvement in the NHS in England Public Administration, 2005; 83: 533-551.
    • (2005) Public Administration , vol.83 , pp. 533-551
    • Baggott, R.1
  • 38
    • 33644701044 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein
    • Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy, 2006; 76: 156-168.
    • (2006) Health Policy , vol.76 , pp. 156-168
    • Tritter, J.Q.1    McCallum, A.2
  • 39
    • 33645215807 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Taking off the suit": engaging the community in primary health care decision-making
    • Anderson E, Shepherd M, Salisbury C. "Taking off the suit": engaging the community in primary health care decision-making. Health Expectations, 2006; 9: 70-80.
    • (2006) Health Expectations , vol.9 , pp. 70-80
    • Anderson, E.1    Shepherd, M.2    Salisbury, C.3
  • 41
    • 2442561411 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Local participatory democracy in Britain's health service: innovation or fragmentation of a universal citizenship?
    • Milewa T. Local participatory democracy in Britain's health service: innovation or fragmentation of a universal citizenship? Social Policy & Administration, 2004; 38: 240-252.
    • (2004) Social Policy & Administration , vol.38 , pp. 240-252
    • Milewa, T.1
  • 42
    • 0041695751 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clients or citizens? Some considerations for primary care organisations
    • Cawston P, Barbour R. Clients or citizens? Some considerations for primary care organisations The British Journal of General Practice, 2003; 53: 716-722.
    • (2003) The British Journal of General Practice , vol.53 , pp. 716-722
    • Cawston, P.1    Barbour, R.2
  • 43
    • 34447104739 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
    • Cawston P, Mercer S, Barbour R. Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work? BMC Health Services Research, 2007; 7: 88-97.
    • (2007) BMC Health Services Research , vol.7 , pp. 88-97
    • Cawston, P.1    Mercer, S.2    Barbour, R.3
  • 46
    • 67650616345 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Whose health, whose care, whose say? Some comments on public involvement in new NHS commissioning arrangements
    • Martin G. Whose health, whose care, whose say? Some comments on public involvement in new NHS commissioning arrangements Critical Public Health, 2009; 19: 123-132.
    • (2009) Critical Public Health , vol.19 , pp. 123-132
    • Martin, G.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.