Instructional design and assessment: Impact of a paper vs virtual simulated patient case on student-perceived confidence and engagement

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Barnett, Susanne G ^a   Gallimore, Casey E ^a   Pitterle, Michael ^a   Morrill, Josh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence; Engagement; Patient case; Situated learning; Virtual

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; RANK SUM TEST; STUDENT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EDUCATION; LABORATORY; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT SIMULATION; PERCEPTION; PHARMACY STUDENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING;

DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; LEARNING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PATIENT SIMULATION; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84959337372     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80116     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
2. Barnicle A, Dugdale T. Situated Learning: Case. University of Wisconsin-Madison Engage Program. http://engage.wisc.edu/ software/cscr/CSCR-handout-1pg.pdf. Accessed March 9, 2015.
3. Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C. Virtual patient simulation in US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2007;82(5):446-451.
4. Jabbur-Lopes MO, Mesquita AR, Silva LM, et al. Virtual patients in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(5):Article 92.
5. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Guidance for standards 2016. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/ GuidanceforStandards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2015.
6. Fuhrman LC, Buff WE, Eaddy M, Dollar M. Utilization of an integrated interactive virtual patient database in a web-based environment for teaching continuity of care. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;65(3):271-275.
7. Hussein G, Kawahara N. Adaptive and longitudinal pharmaceutical care instruction using an interactive voice response/ text-to-speech system. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(2):Article 37.
8. Zary N, Johnson G, Boberg J, Fors UG. Development, implementation and pilot evaluation of a web-based virtual patient case simulation environment – Web-SP. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:10.
9. Orr KK. Integrating virtual patients into a self-care course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(2):Article 30.
10. Benedict N. Virtual patients and problem-based learning in advanced therapeutics. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(8):Article 143.
11. Battaglia JN, Kieser MA, Bruskiewitz RH, Pitterle ME, Thorpe JM. An online virtual-patient program to teach pharmacists and pharmacy students how to provide diabetes-specific medication therapy management. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(7):Article 131.
12. Benedict N, Schonder K. Patient simulation software to augment an advanced pharmaceutics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(2):Article 21.
13. Benedict N, Schonder K, McGee J. Promotion of self-directed learning using virtual patient cases. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(7): Article 151.
14. Douglass MA, Casale JP, Skirvin A, DiVall MV. A virtual patient software program to improve pharmacy student learning in a comprehensive disease management course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(8):Article 172.
15. Ray SM, Wylie DR, Rowe AS, Heidel E, Franks SA. Pharmacy student knowledge retention after completing either a simulated or written patient case. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(5):Article 86.
16. Smith MA, Mohammad RA, Benedict N. Use of virtual patients in an advanced therapeutics pharmacy course to promote active, patient-centered learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(6):Article 125.
17. CSCR Design Worksheet – 7 C’s – University of Wisconsin. https://kb.wisc.edu/images/group16/36496/CaseScenarioHandout- FinalVersion.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2014.
18. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Engage: Transforming teaching and learning through technology. Case Scenario/Critical Reader Builder. http://engage.wisc.edu/software/cscr/. Accessed March 9, 2015.
19. Barnett SG, Gallimore C, Kopacek KJ, Porter AL. Evaluation of electronic SOAP note grading and feedback. Curr Pharm Teaching and Learning. 2014;6(4):516-526.
20. Chernev, A. When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. J Consum Res. 2003;30(2):170-183.
21. Busselle RW. Television exposure, perceived realism, and exemplar accessibility in the social judgment process. Media Psychol. 2001;3(1):43-67.