Adaptive semi supervised support vector machine semi supervised learning with features cooperation for breast cancer classification

Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 53-62

  Nawel, Zemmal ^a   Nabiha, Azizi ^a   Nilanjan, Dey ^b   Mokhtar, Sellami ^a  

^a BADJI MOKHTAR UNIVERSITY   (Algeria)

^b BENGAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Breast Cancer; Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD); Semi Supervised Learning (SSL); Semi Supervised Support Vector Machine (S3VM)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFIER; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENTROPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; KERNEL METHOD; MACHINE LEARNING; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SEMI SUPERVISED LEARNING; SEMI SUPERVISED SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TRAINING;

EID: 84959282271     PISSN: 21567018     EISSN: 21567026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2016.1591     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. N. E. K. Abbadi and E. A. J. Taee, Breast cancer diagnosis by CAD. International Journal of Computer Applications 100, 25 (2014).
2. Symposium franco-algérien sur les nouvelles technologies du numérique pour l'aide au diagnostic et le dépistage des cancers du sein en Algérie-17 et 18 Janvier 2009-Alger.
3. J. Dheeba, N. Albert Singh, and S. Tamil Selvi, Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: A swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 49, 45 (2014).
4. S. Chakraborty, S. Samanta, A. Mukherjee, N. Dey, and S. S. Chaudhuri, Particle swarm optimization based parameter optimization technique in medical information hiding, IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, Madurai, December (2013), pp. 26-28.
5. A. Malich, S. Schmidt, D. R. Fischer, M. Facius, and W. A. Kaiser, The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection. European Journal of Radiology 69, 574 (2009).
6. C. Balleyguier, K. Kinkel, J. Fermanian, S. Malan, G. Djen, P. Taourel, and O. Helenon, Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: Does it help the junior or the senior radiologist? European Journal of Radiology 54, 90 (2005).
7. E. Come, Apprentissage de modéles génératifs pour le diagnostic de systémes complexes avec labellisation douce et contraintes spatiales, Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Technologie de Compiégne (2009).
8. O. Chapelle, B. Scholkopf, and A. Zien, Semi-Supervised Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2006).
9. N. Azizi, N. Zemmal, and Y. Tlili, Kernel based classifiers fusion with features diversity for breast masses classification, Conference 8th International Worshop on Systems, Signal Processing and Their Application (WoSSPA), Algiers-Algeria (2013), pp. 116-121.
10. D. W. Hosmer, A comparison of iterative maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters of a mixture of two normal distributions under three different types of samples. Biometrics 29, 761 (1973).
11. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 39, 1 (1977).
12. T. O'Neill, Normal discrimination with unclassified observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73, 821 (1978).
13. O. Chapelle, B. Scholkopf, and A. Zien (eds.), Semi-Supervised Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2006).
14. V. N. Vapnik, Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA (1982).
15. V. N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York (1996).
16. C. M. Fernandez, A. Smolarz, and G. M. Bouvier, Caractérisation de biscuits extrudés par des méthodes statiques d'analyse de texture. Traitement du Signal. 6 (1989).
17. G. C. Cawley and N. L. C. Talbot, Improved sparse least-squares support vector machines. Neuro-Computing 48, 1025 (2002).
18. C. Gold and P. Sollich, Fast bayesian support vector machine parameter tuning with the nostrum method, IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN), Pasadena, CA, USA (2005).
19. K. Nigam, A. K. Maccallum, S. Thurn, and T. Mitchel, Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning 39, 103 (2000).
20. S. Baluja, Probabilistic modeling for face orientation discrimination: Learning from labeled and unlabeled data, Neural Information Processing Systems. Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems II (1999), pp. 854-860.
21. A. Fujino, N. Ueda, and K. Saito, A hybrid generative/discriminative approach to semi-supervised classifier design, AAAI-05, Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 21, 301 (2006).
22. A. Agrawala, Learning with a probabilistic teacher. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 16, 373 (1970).
23. D. Yarowsky, Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2005), pp. 189-196.
24. B. Maeireizo, D. Litman, and R. Hwa, Co-training for predicting emotions with spoken dialogue data, The Companion Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (2004).
25. C. Rosenberg, M. Hebert, and H. Schneiderman, Semi-supervised selftrain-ing of object detection models, Seventh IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (2002).
26. A. Blum and T. Mitchell, Combining labeled and unlabeled data with cotrain-ing, COLT: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1998).
27. C. Collins and S. Singer, Unsupervised models for named entity classification, Proceedings of EMNLP'99 (1999).
28. D. Pierce and C. Cardie, Limitation of co-training for natural language learning from large datasets, Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2001), pp. 1-9.
29. K. Nigam and R. Ghani, Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training, Ninth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2000), pp. 86-93.
30. M. Collins and Y. Singer, Unsupervised models for named entity classification. EMNLP/VLC-99 (1999).
31. R. Jones, Learning to extract entities from labeled and unlabeled text, Technical Report CMU-LTI-05-191, Carnegie Mellon University, Doctoral Dissertation (2005).
32. M.-F. Balcan and A. Blum, An augmented pac model for semi-supervised learning, Semi-Supervised Learning, edited by O. Chapelle, B. Scholkopf and A. Zien, MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, London, England (2006).
33. Z.-H. Zhou, D.-C. Zhan, and Q. Yang, Semi-supervised learning with very few labeled training examples, Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-07) (2007).
34. B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory (1992), pp. 144-152.
35. V. N. Vapnik, Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA (1982).
36. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 20, 273 (1995).
37. N. Azizi, Y. Tlili-Guiassa, and N. Zemmal, A computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer combining complementarily and nex scheme of svm classifiers fusion. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 8, 45 (2013).
38. H. A. Le Thi, V. V. Nguyen, and S. Ouchani, Gene selection for cancer classification using DCA. Advanced Data Mining and Applications 3, 62 (2009).
39. N. Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histogram. IEEE Tran. Systems Man Cybernet SMC-9, 82 (1979).
40. A. Mizushima and R. Lu, An image segmentation method for apple sorting and grading using support vector machine and Otsu's method. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 94, 29 (2013).
41. S. Forrest, Genetic algorithms: Principles of natural selection applied to computation. Science, New Series 261, 872 (1993).
42. N. Azizi, N. Zemmal, M. Sellami, and N. Farah, A new hybrid method combining genetic algorithm and support vector machine classifier: Aplication to CAD system for mammogram images, The 4th International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (2014), pp. 415-420.
43. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
44. M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore, and P. Kegelmeyer, The digital database for screening mammography, Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography (2001), pp. 212-218.