Semi-supervised learning with very few labeled training examples

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 675-680

  Zhou, Zhi Hua ^a   Zhan, De Chuan ^a   Yang, Qiang ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CORRELATION METHODS; IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

CANONICAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; LABELED TRAINING;

SUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 36348938695     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Balean, M.-F.; Blum, A.; and Yang, K. 2005. Co-training and expansion: Towards bridging theory and practice. In NIPS 17. 89-96.
2. Belkin, M., and Niyogi, P. 2004. Semi-supervised learning on Riemannian manifolds. Machine Learning 56(1-3):209-239.
3. Blum, A., and Chawla, S. 2001. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data using graph mincuts. In ICML, 19-26.
4. Blum, A., and Mitchell, T. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In COLT, 92-100.
5. Chapelle, O.; Schölkopf, B.; and Zien, A., eds. 2006. Semi-Supervised Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Dasgupta, S.; Littman, M.; and McAllester, D. 2002. PAC generalization bounds for co-training. In NIPS 14. 375-382.
7. Fink, M. 2005. Object classification from a single example utilizing class relevance metrics. In NIPS 17. 449-456.
8. Fleuret, F., and Blanchard, G. 2006. Pattern recognition from one example by chopping. In MPS 18. 371-378.
9. Fujino, A.; Ueda, N.; and Saito, K. 2005. A hybrid generative/ discriminative approach to semi-supervised classifier design. In AAAI, 764-769.
10. Goldman, S., and Zhou, Y. 2000. Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In ICML, 327-334.
11. Hardoon, D. R.; Szedmak, S.; and Shawe-Taylor, J. 2004. Canonical correlation analysis: An overview with application to learning methods. Neural Computation 16(12):2639-2664.
12. Hotelling, H. 1936. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 28(4):321-377.
13. Kushmerick, N. 1999. Learning to remove internet advertisements. In Agents, 175-181.
14. Miller, D. J., and Uyar, H. S. 1997. A mixture of experts classifier with learning based on both labelled and unlabeled data. In NIPS 9. 571-577.
15. Nigam, K.; McCallum, A. K.; Thrun, S.; and Mitchell, T. 2000. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning 39(2-3):103-134.
16. Sarkar, A. 2001. Applying co-training methods to statistical parsing. In NAACL, 95-102.
17. Tian, Q.; Yu, J.; Xue, Q.; and Sebe, N. 2004. A new analysis of the value of unlabeled data in semi-supervised learning for image retrieval. In ICME, 1019-1022.
18. Wang, C.; Ding, C.; Meraz, R. F.; and Holbrook, S. R. 2005. PSoL: A positive sample only learning algorithm for finding non-coding RNA genes. Bioinformatics 22(21):2590-2596.
19. Zhang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Li, M.; Ma, W.-Y; and Zhang, H. J. 2005. A probabilistic semantic model for image annotation and multi-modal image retrieval. In ICCV, 846-851.
20. Zhou, Z.-H., and Li, M. 2005. Tri-training: Exploiting unlabeled data using three classifiers. IEEE Trans Knowledge and Data Engineering 17(11):1529-1541.
21. Zhou, Z.-H.; Chen, K.-J.; and Dai, H.-B. 2006. Enhancing relevance feedback in image retrieval using unlabeled data. ACM Trans Information Systems 24(2):219-244.
22. Zhou, D.; Schölkopf, B.; and Hofmann, T. 2005. Semi-supervised learning on directed graphs. In NIPS 17. 1633-1640.
23. Zhu, X. 2006. Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical Report 1530, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI.