A comparison of on-pack quitline information formats

Tobacco Control

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 211-217

  Hoek, Janet ^a   Gendall, Philip ^a   Eckert, Christine ^b   Rolls, Kirsty ^a   Louviere, Jordan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HEAT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEW ZEALAND; PERCEPTION; STIMULUS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPREHENSION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACKAGING; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; READING; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPREHENSION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRODUCT PACKAGING; READING; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959162399     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051820     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet 2010;376:1261-71.
2. Warner KE, Mendez D. Tobacco control policy in developed countries: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12:876-87.
3. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control 2012;21:172-80.
4. Hammond D, Fong GT, McNeill A, et al. Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl III):19-25.
5. Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health 2006;96:1359.
6. Etter J-F, Stapleton JA. Nicotine replacement therapy for long-term smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Tob Control 2006;15:280-5.
7. Zhu S-H, Anderson C, Tedeschi G, et al. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1087-93.
8. Borland R, Segan CJ. The potential of quitlines to increase smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Rev 2006;25:73-8.
9. West R, Sohal T. “Catastrophic” pathways to smoking cessation: findings from national survey. BMJ 2006;332:458-60.
10. Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control 2011;20:327-37.
11. Borland R, Yong H, Wilson N, et al. How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey. Addiction 2009;104:669-75.
12. Thrasher JF, Carpenter MJ, Andrews JO, et al. Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:590-600.
13. Hoek J, Wilson N, Allen M, et al. Lessons from New Zealand’s introduction of pictorial health warnings on tobacco packaging. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:861-6.
14. Thrasher JF, Osman A, Moodie C, et al. Promoting cessation resources through cigarette package warning labels: a longitudinal survey with adult smokers in Canada, Australia and Mexico. Tob Control 2015;24:e23-31.
15. Rippetoe PA, Rogers RW. Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:596.
16. Azagba S, Sharaf MF. The effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking behavior: evidence from the Canadian experience. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:708-17.
17. Wilson N, Li J, Hoek J, et al. Long-term benefit of increasing the prominence of a Quitline number on cigarette packaging: 3 years of Quitline call data. N Z Med J 2010;123:109-11.
18. Wilson N, Weerasekera D, Hoek J, et al. Increased smoker recognition of a national quitline number following introduction of improved pack warnings: ITC Project New Zealand. Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12(s1):S72-7.
19. Li J, Grigg M. New Zealand: new graphic warnings encourage registrations with the quitline. Tob Control 2009;18:72.
20. North American Quitline Consortium. Electronic document submission to FDA. 2011: Letter.
21. Zhu S-H, Gardiner P, Cummins S, et al. Quitline utilization rates of African-American and white smokers: the California experience. Am J Health Promot 2011;25(sp5):S51-8.
22. Mosbaek CH, Austin DF, Stark MJ, et al. The association between advertising and calls to a tobacco quitline. Tob Control 2007;16(Suppl 1):i24-9.
23. Durkin S, Biener L, Wakefield M. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health 2009;99:2217-23.
24. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Nonnemaker JM, et al. Promoting calls to a quitline: quantifying the influence of message theme, strong negative emotions and graphic images in television advertisements. Tob Control 2011;20:279-84.
25. Willemsen MC, Simons C, Zeeman G. Impact of the new EU health warnings on the Dutch quit line. Tob Control 2002;11:381-2.
26. Miller CL, Hill DJ, Quester PG, et al. Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number. Tob Control 2009;18:235-7.
27. McRobbie H, Raw M, Chan S. Research priorities for Article 14—demand reduction measures concerning tobacco dependence and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:805-16.
28. Kaufman A, Augustson E, Davis K, et al. Awareness and use of tobacco quitlines: evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Health Commun 2010;15(S3):264-78.
29. Schlereth C, Eckert C, Skiera B. Using discrete choice experiments to estimate willingness-to-pay intervals. Mark Lett 2012;23:761-76.
30. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
31. Hoek J, Wong C, Gendall P, et al. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tob Control 2011;20:183-8.
32. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers’ perceptions about brand image? An experimental study. Tob Control 2008;17:416-21.
33. Maynard OM, Munafò MR, Leonards U. Visual attention to health warnings on plain tobacco packaging in adolescent smokers and non-smokers. Addiction 2013;108:413-19.