Molecular analysis of DNA in blastocoele fluid using next-generation sequencing

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 637-645

  Zhang, Yixin ^a,b   Li, Na ^c   Wang, Li ^b,d   Sun, Huiying ^e   Ma, Minyue ^b   Wang, Hui ^b   Xu, Xiaofei ^b   Zhang, Wenke ^b   Liu, Yingyu ^b   Cram, David S ^f   Sun, Baofa ^e   Yao, Yuanqing ^b  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^c BEIJING INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY   (China)

^d First Hospital of Kunming   (China)

^e Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation   (China)

^f Berry Genomics   (China)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Blastocoele fluid; Blastomere; Next generation sequencing; Preimplantation genetic testing

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BLASTOCOELE FLUID; BLASTOCYST; BLASTOMA; BODY FLUID; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HUMAN; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDITY; VITRIFICATION; BIOLOGY; DNA SEQUENCE; EVALUATION STUDY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES;

BLASTOMERES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84959153042     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0667-7     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brezina PR, Brezina DS, Kearns WG. Preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ. 2012;345, e5908. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5908.
2. Brezina PR, Kutteh WH. Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ. 2015;350:g7611. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7611.
3. Yan L, Wei Y, Huang J, Zhu X, Shi X, Xia X, et al. Advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening. Sci Chin Life Sci. 2014;57(7):665–71. doi:10.1007/s11427-014-4683-5.
4. Brezina PR, Ke RW, Kutteh WH. Preimplantation genetic screening: a practical guide. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2013;7:37–42. doi:10.4137/CMRH.S10852.
5. Simpson JL. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(7):682–95. doi:10.1002/pd.2552.
6. SenGupta SB, Delhanty JD. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: recent triumphs and remaining challenges. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012;12(6):585–92. doi:10.1586/erm.12.61.
7. Milachich T. New advances of preimplantation and prenatal genetic screening and noninvasive testing as a potential predictor of health status of babies. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:306505. doi:10.1155/2014/306505.
8. Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Nuccitelli A, De Palma R, Kahraman S, Sertyel S, et al. Rapid protocol for pre-conception genetic diagnosis of single gene mutations by first polar body analysis: a possible solution for the Italian patients. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(1):62–4. doi:10.1002/pd.1905.
9. Capalbo A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, Baldi M, Colamaria S, et al. Reply: questions about the accuracy of polar body analysis for preimplantation genetic screening. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1733–6. doi:10.1093/humrep/det070.
10. Hou Y, Fan W, Yan L, Li R, Lian Y, Huang J, et al. Genome analyses of single human oocytes. Cell. 2013;155(7):1492–506. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.040.
11. Salvaggio CN, Forman EJ, Garnsey HM, Treff NR, Scott Jr RT. Polar body based aneuploidy screening is poorly predictive of embryo ploidy and reproductive potential. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(9):1221–6. doi:10.1007/s10815-014-0293-1.
12. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, Wilson RD, Audibert F, Brock JA, et al. Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can: JOGC = J D’obstet Gynecol Du Can: JOGC. 2015;37(5):451–63.
13. Scott KL, Hong KH, Scott Jr RT. Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):608–14. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.004.
14. Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):624–30. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039.
15. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(3):481–92. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem327.
16. Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3246–52. doi:10.1093/humrep/del285.
17. Palini S, Galluzzi L, De Stefani S, Bianchi M, Wells D, Magnani M, et al. Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(6):603–10. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.012.
18. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Pomante A, Crivello AM, Cafueri G, Valerio M, et al. Blastocentesis: a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1692–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.021. e6.
19. Magli MC, Pomante A, Cafueri G, Valerio M, Crippa A, Ferraretti AP, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic fluid? Fertil Steril. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.018.
20. Tobler KJ, Zhao Y, Ross R, Benner AT, Xu X, Du L, et al. Blastocoel fluid from differentiated blastocysts harbors embryonic genomic material capable of a whole-genome deoxyribonucleic acid amplification and comprehensive chromosome microarray analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):418–25. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.028.
21. Cohen J, Grudzinskas G, Johnson MH. Embryonic DNA sampling without biopsy: the beginnings of non-invasive PGD? Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(6):520–1. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.001.
22. Liang D, Lv W, Wang H, Xu L, Liu J, Li H, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing of fetal whole chromosome aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(5):409–15. doi:10.1002/pd.4033.
23. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–8.
24. Lukaszuk K, Pukszta S, Wells D, Cybulska C, Liss J, Plociennik L, et al. Routine use of next-generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of blastomeres obtained from embryos on day 3 in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(4):1031–6. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.123.
25. Chang LJ, Huang CC, Tsai YY, Hung CC, Fang MY, Lin YC, et al. Blastocyst biopsy and vitrification are effective for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(5):1435–44. doi:10.1093/humrep/det048.
26. Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, van Roosendaal E, Vandervorst M, et al. Births after vitrification at morula and blastocyst stages: effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoelic cavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):744–51.
27. Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RM. The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development. 1989;107(3):597–604.
28. Hardy K, Stark J, Winston RM. Maintenance of the inner cell mass in human blastocysts from fragmented embryos. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(4):1165–9. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.010090.
29. Mouliere F, Rosenfeld N. Circulating tumor-derived DNA is shorter than somatic DNA in plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(11):3178–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.1501321112.
30. Taylor TH, Gitlin SA, Patrick JL, Crain JL, Wilson JM, Griffin DK. The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):571–81. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmu016.
31. Zong C, Lu S, Chapman AR, Xie XS. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell. Sci (New York, NY). 2012;338(6114):1622–6. doi:10.1126/science.1229164.
32. Liu D, Liu C, DeVries S, Waldman F, Cote RJ, Datar RH. LM-PCR permits highly representative whole genome amplification of DNA isolated from small number of cells and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections. Diagn Mol Pathol: Am J Surg Pathol, Part B. 2004;13(2):105–15.
33. Lam CW, Mak CM. Allele dropout caused by a non-primer-site SNV affecting PCR amplification—a call for next-generation primer design algorithm. Clinica Chimica Acta. Int J Clin Chem. 2013;421:208–12. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.014.
34. Natesan SA, Bladon AJ, Coskun S, Qubbaj W, Prates R, Munne S, et al. Genome-wide karyomapping accurately identifies the inheritance of single-gene defects in human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Genet Med: Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2014;16(11):838–45. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.45.
35. Gimenez C, Sarasa J, Arjona C, Vilamajo E, Martinez-Pasarell O, Wheeler K, et al. Karyomapping allows preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a de-novo deletion undetectable using conventional PGD technology. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(6):770–5. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.08.017.
36. Konstantinidis M, Prates R, Goodall NN, Fischer J, Tecson V, Lemma T, et al. Live births following Karyomapping of human blastocysts: experience from clinical application of the method. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(3):394–403. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.05.018.
37. Berger VK, Baker VL. Preimplantation diagnosis for single gene disorders. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32(2):107–13. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363552.
38. Wang L, Cram DS, Shen J, Wang X, Zhang J, Song Z, et al. Validation of copy number variation sequencing for detecting chromosome imbalances in human preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 2014;91(2):37. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.114.120576.
39. D’Alessandro A, Federica G, Palini S, Bulletti C, Zolla L. A mass spectrometry-based targeted metabolomics strategy of human blastocoele fluid: a promising tool in fertility research. Mol BioSyst. 2012;8(4):953–8. doi:10.1039/c1mb05358b.
40. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–2.
41. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.
42. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.
43. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–2. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033.