Blastocentesis: A source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1692-1699.e6

  Gianaroli, Luca ^a   Magli, M Cristina ^a   Pomante, Alessandra ^a   Crivello, Anna M ^a   Cafueri, Giulia ^a   Valerio, Marzia ^a   Ferraretti, Anna P ^a  

^a Reproductive Medicine Unit   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blastocele; Blastocyst; Blastomere; Polar bodies; Preimplantation genetic screening

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BLASTOCENTESIS; BLASTOCYST; BLASTOCYST FLUID; BLASTOMA; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MALE; PILOT STUDY; PLOIDY; POLAR BODY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TROPHECTODERM CELL; BODY FLUID; CHEMISTRY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADULT; BLASTOCYST; BLASTOMERES; BODY FLUIDS; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; PLOIDIES; POLAR BODIES; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84921962090     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barcroft LC, Moseley AE, Lingrel JB, Watson AJ. Deletion of the Na/K-ATPase alpha1-subunit gene (Atp1a1) does not prevent cavitation of the preimplantation mouse embryo. Mech Dev 2004;121:417-26.
2. Barcroft LC, Offenberg H, Thomsen P, Watson AJ. Aquaporin proteins in murine trophectoderm mediate transepithelial water movements during cavitation. Dev Biol 2003;256:342-54.
3. Watson AJ, Natale DR, Barcroft LC. Molecular regulation of blastocyst formation. Anim Reprod Sci 2004;82:583-92.
4. Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L, Gianaroli L, Korman I, Trounson AO. Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in-vitro. Hum Reprod 2000;15: 1781-6.
5. Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M, Calderon G, Cohen J, Munne S. Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1954-8.
6. Li M, Marin DeUgarte C, Surrey M, Danzer H, DeCherney A, Hill DL. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1395-400.
7. Hassold T, Hall H, Hunt P. The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum Mol Genet 2007;16:R203-8.
8. Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2596-608.
9. Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 2012;5:2.
10. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitri fication facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age. Fertil Steril 2013;100:615-9.
11. Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013;100:697-703.
12. Forman EJ, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Garnsey HM, Katz-Jaffe MG, Scott RT Jr, et al. Embryos whose polar bodies contain isolated reciprocal chromosome aneuploidy are almost always euploid. Hum Reprod 2013;28:502-8.
13. Fragouli E, Wells D. Aneuploidy in the human blastocyst. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011;133:149-59.
14. Palini S, Galluzzi L, de Stefani S, Bianchi M, Wells D, Magnani M, et al. Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;26:603-10.
15. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive MedicineESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1270-83.
16. Magli MC, Montag M, Koester M, Muzii L, Geraedts J, Collins J, et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects. Hum Rep 2011;26:3181-5.
17. Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC, Repping S, Handyside A, Staessen C, et al. Polar body array-CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Hum Reprod 2011;26:3173-80.
18. d'Alessandro A, Federica G, Palini S, Bulletti C, Zolla L. A mass spectrometry-based targeted metabolomics strategy of human blastocoele fluid: a promising tool in fertility research. Mol Biosyst 2012;8:953-8.
19. Jensen PL, Beck HC, Petersen J, Hreinsson J, Wa˚nggren K, Laursen SB, et al. Proteomic analysis of human blastocoel fluid and blastocyst cells stem cells and development. Stem Cells Dev 2013;22:1126-35.
20. Hardy K, Stark J, Winston RML. Maintenance of the inner cell mass in human blastocysts from fragmented embryos. Biol Reprod 2003;68:1165-9.
21. Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2006;21:3246-52.
22. Capalbo A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, Baldi M, Colamaria S, et al. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development. Hum Reprod 2013;28:509-18.
23. Capalbo A, Wright G, Elliott T, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Nagy ZP. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2298-307.
24. Forman EJ, Upham KM, Cheng M, Zhao T, Hong KH, Treff NR, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2013;100:718-24.
25. Watrin E, Prigent C. Sister chromatid cohesion and aneuploidy. In: Storchova Z, editor. Aneuploidy in health and disease. Intech. Accessed May 16, 2012. Available at: www.intechopen.com/books/aneuploidy-in-health-and-disease/sister-chromatid-cohesion-and-aneuploidy. Last accessed November 3, 2014.
26. Sheltzer JM, Blank HM, Pfau SJ, Tange Y, George BM, Humpton TJ, et al. Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast. Science 2011;333:1026-30.
27. Lightfoot DA, Kouznetsova A, Mahdy E, Wilbertz J, Höög C. The fate ofmosaic aneuploid embryos during mouse development. Dev Biol 2006;289:384-94.