When Politicians Dodge Questions: An Analysis of Presidential Press Conferences and Debates

Mass Communication and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 411-429

  Clementson, David ^a   Eveland, William P ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959065793     PISSN: 15205436     EISSN: 15327825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1120876     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. G.Bateson, D.D.Jackson, J.Haley, & J.Weakland, (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251–264. doi:10.1002/bs.3830010402
2. J.B.Bavelas, A.Black, N.Chovil, & J.Mullett, (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. W.L.Bennett, (2001). News: The politics of illusion (4th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
4. W.L.Benoit, (2000). Another visit to the theory of image restoration strategies. Communication Quarterly, 48, 40–44. doi:10.1080/01463370009385578
5. W.L.Benoit, (2004). Image restoration discourse and crisis communication. In D.P.Millar & R.L.Heath (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 263–280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. L.Bitzer, & T.Rueter, (1980). Carter vs. Ford: The counterfeit debates of 1976. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. N.Bradburn, S.Sudman, & B.Wansink, (2004). Asking questions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. P.Bull, (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 115–131. doi:10.1177/0261927X94132002
9. P.Bull, (1998). Equivocation theory and news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 36–51. doi:10.1177/0261927X980171002
10. P.Bull, (2003). Slippery politicians? The Psychologist, 16, 592–595.
11. P.Bull, (2008). “Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity”: Equivocation and facework in noncommittal political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 333–344. doi:10.1177/0261927X08322475
12. P.E.Bull, J.Elliott, D.Palmer, & L.Walker, (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 267–284. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01097.x
13. P.Bull, & K.Mayer, (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14, 651–666. doi:10.2307/3791379
14. S.E.Clayman, (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society, 30, 403–442. http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0047404501003037
15. S.E.Clayman, & J.Heritage, (2002a). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. S.E.Clayman, & J.Heritage, (2002b). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749–775. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x
17. C.Coglianese, (2009). The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 22, 529–544. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01451.x
18. J.E.Cohen, (1995). Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 87–107. doi:10.2307/2111759
19. W.T.Coombs, & S.J.Holladay, (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 165–186. doi:10.1177/089331802237233
20. E.M.Eisenberg, (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242. doi:10.1080/03637758409390197
21. M.Ekström, (2009). Announced refusal to answer: A study of norms and accountability in broadcast political interviews. Discourse Studies, 11, 681–702. doi:10.1177/1461445609347232
22. M.Ekström, & R.Fitzgerald, (2014). Groundhog day: Extended repetitions in political news interviews. Journalism Studies, 15, 82–97. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.776812
23. T.C.Ellington, (2013). The most transparent administration in history? An assessment of official secrecy in the Obama administration’s first term. Public Integrity, 15, 133–148. doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922150202
24. W.P.Eveland, Jr., D.M.McLeod, & A.I.Nathanson, (1994). Reporters vs. undecided voters: An analysis of the questions asked during the 1992 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 42, 390–406. doi:10.1080/01463379409369945
25. O.Feldman, K.Kinoshita, & P.Bull, (2015). Culture or communicative conflict? The analysis of equivocation in broadcast political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 65–89. doi:10.1177/0261927X14557567
26. G.A.Fine, & E.Eisenberg, (2002). Tricky Dick and Slick Willy: Despised presidents and generational imprinting. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 553–565. doi:10.1177/0002764202238062
27. W.A.Gamson, (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. J.A.Garrison, (2001). Framing foreign policy alternatives in the inner circle: President Carter, his advisors, and the struggle for the arms control agenda. Political Psychology, 22, 775–807. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00262
29. S.Gilberg, C.Eyal, M.McCombs, & D.Nicholas, (1980). The State of the Union address and the press agenda. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 57, 584–588. doi:10.1177/107769908005700405
30. M.A.Hamilton, & P.J.Mineo, (1998). A framework for understanding equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 3–35. doi:10.1177/0261927X980171001
31. S.Harris, (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P.Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast talk (pp. 76–99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. A.F.Hayes, (2007). Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the Spiral of Silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. Journal of Communication, 57, 785–802. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00368.x
33. A.F.Hayes, & K.Krippendorff, (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664
34. J.Heritage, (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
35. J.Heritage, (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T.van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (vol. 3, pp. 95–117). New York, NY: Academic Press.
36. E.T.Higgins, J.A.Bargh, & W.Lombardi, (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 59–69. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.1.59
37. T.J.Johnson, W.Wanta, J.T.Byrd, & C.Lee, (1995). Exploring FDR’S relationship with the press: A historical agenda-setting study. Political Communication, 12, 157–172. doi:10.1080/10584609.1995.9963063
38. V.O.Key, Jr. (1958). Politics, parties, and pressure groups (4th ed.). New York, NY: Crowell.
39. D.R.Kinder, (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D.T.Gilbert, S.T.Fiske, & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 778–867). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40. D.R.Kinder, & L.M.Sanders, (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
41. S.L.Kline, B.Simunich, & H.Weber, (2008). Understanding the effects of nonstraightforward communication in organization discourse: The case of equivocal messages and corporate identity. Communication Research, 35, 770–791. doi:10.1177/0093650208324269
42. S.L.Kline, B.Simunich, & H.Weber, (2009). The use of equivocal messages in responding to corporate challenges. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 40–58. doi:10.1080/00909880802592623
43. A.Koestler, (2015). Darkness at noon (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Scribner.
44. K.Krippendorff, (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. M.Manis, (1961). The interpretation of opinion statements as a function of message ambiguity and recipient attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 76–81. doi:10.1037/h0045537
46. M.S.McKinney, & D.B.Carlin, (2004). Political campaign debates. In L.L.Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203–234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. J.Miller, & J.A.Krosnick, (1996). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of research on the priming hypothesis. In D.M.Mutz, P.M.Sniderman, & R.A.Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 79–99). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48. J.R.Petrocik, (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825–850. doi:10.2307/2111797 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111797
49. P.Rasiah, (2010). A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 664–680. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.010
50. T.Rogers, & M.I.Norton, (2011). The artful dodger: Answering the wrong question the right way. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 139–147. doi:10.1037/a0023439
51. L.A.Samovar, (1962). Ambiguity and unequivocation in the Kennedy-Nixon television debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 48 277–279. doi:10.1080/00335636209382548
52. C.E.Sluzki, J.Beavin, A.Tarnopolsky, & E.Verón, (1967). Transactional disqualification: Research on the double bind. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 494–504. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1967.01730220106014
53. R.Tourangeau, L.J.Rips, & K.Rasinski, (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54. J.Turcotte, (2015). The news norms and values of presidential debate agendas: An analysis of format and moderator influence on question content. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 239–258. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.893362
55. W.Wanta, M.A.Stephenson, J.V.Turk, & M.E.McCombs, (1989). How president’s State of Union talk influenced news media agendas. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 66, 537–541. doi:10.1177/107769908906600301
56. P.Watzlawick, J.Beavin, & D.D.Jackson, (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
57. D.M.Wegner, (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34
58. D.M.Wegner, & R.Erber, (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 903–912. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.903
59. M.L.Williams, & B.Goss, (1975). Equivocation: Character insurance. Human Communication Research, 1, 265–270. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00273.x
60. P.G.Zimbardo, (1960). Verbal ambiguity and judgmental distortion. Psychological Reports, 6, 57–58. doi:10.2466/pr0.1960.6.1.57