"Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity": Equivocation and facework in noncommittal political discourse

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 333-344

  Bull, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Commitment; Equivocation; Facework; News interviews; Political discourse; Televised political interviews

Indexed keywords

EID: 55149092378     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X08322475     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Bryson, L., & Mullett, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137-145.
2. Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56-310). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bull, P.E. (1998). Equivocation theory and news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 36-51.
6. Bull, P.E. (2000). Equivocation and the rhetoric of modernization: An analysis of televised interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 222-247.
7. Bull, P.E. (2003 a). The analysis of equivocation in political interviews. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), Doing social psychology research (pp. 205-228). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8. Bull, P.E. (2003 b). The microanalysis of political communication: Claptrap and ambiguity. London: Psychology Press.
9. Bull, P.E., & Elliott, J. (1998). Level of threat: Means of assessing interviewer toughness and neutrality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 220-244.
10. Bull, P.E., Elliott, J., Palmer, D., & Walker, L. (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 267-284.
11. Bull, P.E., & Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14, 651-666.
12. Clayman, S.E. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 35, 474-492.
13. Clayman, S.E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 163-198). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
15. Feldman, O. (2004). Talking politics in Japan today. Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press.
16. Gnisci, A., & Bonaiuto, M. (2003). Grilling politicians: Politicians' answers to questions in television interviews and courtroom examinations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 385-413.
17. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior (pp. 5-45). Garden City, NY: Anchor. (Reprinted from " On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction, " Psychiatry, 18, 213-231, by E. Goffman, 1955 )
18. Hamilton, M.A., & Mineo, P.J. (1998). A framework for understanding equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 3-35.
19. Harris, S. (2001). Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse and Society, 12, 451-472.
20. Jucker, J. (1986). News interviews: A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam: Gieben.
21. Tracy, K. (1990). The many faces of facework. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 209-222). Chichester, UK: Wiley.