National needs assessment of patients treated at the United States Federally-Funded Hemophilia Treatment Centers

Haemophilia

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2016, Pages e11-e17

  Butler, R B ^a   Cheadle, A ^b   Aschman, D J ^c   Riske, B ^d   Senter, S ^b   Mclaughlin, K M ^e   Young, G ^f   Ahuja, S ^g   Forsberg, Ann D ^c  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^b Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity   (United States)

^c National Hemophilia Program Coordinating Center   (United States)

^d Mountain States Regional Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center   (United States)

^e HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemophilia Treatment Centers; Patient needs assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SCHOOL CHILD; SEXUAL HEALTH; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT; ECONOMICS; HEMOPHILIA A; INFANT; NEWBORN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959062955     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hae.12810     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Levine PH, McVerry BA, Segelman AE, Cranford CM, Zimbler S. Comprehensive health care clinic for hemophiliacs. Arch Intern Med 1976; 136: 792-4.
2. Evatt B. Infectious disease in the blood supply and the public health response. Semin Hematol 2006; 43(2 Suppl. 3): S4-9. Review.
3. Baker JR, Crudder SO, Riske B, Bias V, Forsberg A. A model for a regional system of care to promote the health and well-being of people with rare chronic genetic disorders. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 1910-6.
4. Hoots WK. Comprehensive care for hemophilia and related inherited bleeding disorders: why it matters. Curr Hematol Rep 2003; 2: 395-401. Review.
5. Manco-Johnson MJ, Riske B, Kasper CK. Advances in care of children with hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003; 29: 585-94. Review.
6. Standards and Criteria for the Care of persons with Congenital Bleeding Disorders. MASAC Recommendations #132. New York, National Hemophilia Foundation 2002. http://www.hemophilia.org/Researchers-Healthcare-Providers/Medical-and-Scientific-Advisory-Council-MASAC/MASAC-Recommendations/Standards-and-Criteria-for-the-Care-of-Persons-with-Congenital-Bleeding-Disorders.
7. Baker JR, Riske B, Drake JH et al. US Hemophilia Treatment Center population trends 1990-2010: patient diagnoses, demographics, health services utilization. Haemophilia 2013; 19: 21-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02915.x.
8. Parker CS, Tsai J, Siddiqi AE, Atrash HK, Richardson LC. Meeting the emerging public health needs of persons with blood disorders. Am J Prev Med 2014; 47: 658-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.008.
9. Soucie JM. Public health surveillance and data collection: general principles and impact on hemophilia care. Hematology 2012; 17(Suppl. 1): S144-6. doi: 10.1179/102453312X13336169156537.
10. Soucie JM, McAlister S, McClellan A, Oakley M, Su Y. The universal data collection surveillance system for rare bleeding disorders. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38(4 Suppl.): S475-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.023.
11. Buchbinder D, Ragni MV. What is the role of prophylaxis in the improvement of health-related quality of life of patients with hemophilia? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013; 2013: 52-5. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.52.
12. Poon JL, Zhou ZY, Doctor JN et al. Quality of life in haemophilia A: Hemophilia Utilization Group Study Va (HUGS-Va). Haemophilia 2012; 18: 699-707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02791.x.
13. Aledort L, Bullinger M, von Mackensen S, Wasserman J, Young NL, Globe D. Why should we care about quality of life in persons with haemophilia? Haemophilia 2012; 18: e154-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02771.x.
14. Gringeri A, Von Mackensen S. Quality of life in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2008; 14(Suppl. 3): 19-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01709.x.
15. Armstrong EP, Malone DC, Krishnan S, Wessler MJ. Costs and utilization of hemophilia A and B patients with and without inhibitors. J Med Econ 2014; 17: 798-802. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.953679.
16. Farrugia A, Cassar J, Kimber MC et al. Treatment for life for severe haemophilia A - a cost-utility model for prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment. Haemophilia 2013; 19: e228-38. doi: 10.1111/hae.12121.
17. Miners AH. Economic evaluations of prophylaxis with clotting factor for people with severe haemophilia: why do the results vary so much? Haemophilia 2013; 19: 174-80. doi: 10.1111/hae.12009. Review.
18. Guh S, Grosse SD, Mcalister S, Kessler CM, Soucie JM. Healthcare expenditures for males with haemophilia and employer sponsored insurance in the United States, 2008. Haemophilia 2012; 18: 268-75.
19. Arnold E, Lane S, Webert KE et al. What should men living with haemophilia need to know? The perspectives of Canadian men with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2014; 20: 219-25. doi: 10.1111/hae.12297.
20. Nilson J, Schachter C, Mulder K et al. A qualitative study identifying the knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of young men with mild haemophilia. Haemophilia 2012; 18: e120-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02714.x.
21. Walsh CE, Valentino LA. Factor VIII prophylaxis for adult patients with severe haemophilia A: results of a US survey of attitudes and practices. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 1014-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.
22. Nazzaro AM, Owens S, Hoots WK, Larson KL. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of youths in the US hemophilia population: results of a national survey. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1618-22.
23. duTreil S. Physical and psychosocial challenges in adult hemophilia patients with inhibitors. J Blood Med 2014; 5: 115-22. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S63265. eCollection 2014. Review.
24. Cassis FR, Querol F, Forsyth A, Iorio A; HERO International Advisory Board. Psychosocial aspects of haemophilia: a systematic review of methodologies and findings. Haemophilia 2012; 18: e101-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02683.x. Review.
25. Coppola A, Cerbone AM, Mancuso G, Mansueto MF, Mazzini C, Zanon E. Confronting the psychological burden of haemophilia. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02280.x. Review.
26. Spilsbury M. Models for psychosocial services in the developed and developing world. Haemophilia 2004; 10(Suppl. 4): 25-9. Review.
27. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. The National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs Chartbook 2009-2010: CSHCN Core System Outcomes: Goals for a System of Care. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013. Last accessed: September 29, 2015. http://mchb.hrsa.gov/cshcn0910/core/co.html
28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. The National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs Chartbook 2009-2010: Youth with Special Health Care Needs Receive the Services Necessary to Make Transitions to Adult Health Care. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013. Last accessed: September 29, 2015. Link: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/cshcn0910/core/pages/co6/co6tahc.html http://mchb.hrsa.gov/cshn05/MI/cokmp.pdf
29. Zhou ZY, Riske B, Forsberg AD, Ullman M, Koerper MA, Curtis RG et al. Self-reported barriers to hemophilia care in persons with factor VIII deficiency. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41(6 Suppl. 4): S346-53.
30. Breakey VR, Blanchette VS, Bolton-Maggs PH. Towards comprehensive care in transition for young people with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2010; 16: 848-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02249.x. Review.
31. Young G. From boy to man: recommendations for the transition process in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2012; 18(Suppl. 5): 27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02893.x.
32. van Staa AL, Jedeloo S, van Meeteren J, Latour JM. Crossing the transition chasm: experiences and recommendations for improving transitional care of young adults, parents and providers. Child Care Health Dev 2011; 37: 821-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01261.x
33. Tuchman LK, Slap GB, Britto MT. Transition to adult care: experiences and expectations of adolescents with a chronic illness. Child Care Health Dev 2008; 34: 557-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00844.x.
34. Blumberg SJ, Welch EM, Chowdhury SR, Upchurch HL, Parker EK, Skalland BJ. Design and Operation of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, 2005-2006. DHHS Publication No (PHS) 2009-1321, December 2008 (www.childhealthdata.org2009/10).
35. Fox R. Mail Survey Response Tate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opin Q 1978; 52: 467-91.
36. Kanuk L, Berenson C. Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. 1978; J Mkg Res 12: 440-53.