Between X and Y: how process tracing contributes to opening the black box of causality

New Political Economy

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 437-454

  Trampusch, Christine ^a   Palier, Bruno ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b SCIENCES PO   (France)

Author keywords

causality; method; methodology; ontology; Process tracing

Indexed keywords

GUIDELINE; METHODOLOGY; PROCESSING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84959054094     PISSN: 13563467     EISSN: 14699923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2015.1134465     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. R.Adcock, and D.Collier, (2001), ‘Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research’, American Political Science Review, 95 (3), pp. 529–54. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401003100
2. R.H.Bates,, et al. (eds.) (1998), Analytic Narratives (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
3. D.Beach, and R.B.Pedersen, (2013), Process-Tracing Methods: Foundation and Guidelines (Ann Arbor: University of University of Michigan Press).
4. A.Bennett, (2008), ‘Process Tracing: A Bayesian Perspective’, in J.Box-Steffensmeier, H.E.Brady, and D.Collier (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodological (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 217–70.
5. A.Bennett, (2015), ‘Appendix: Discipling our Conjectures: Systematizing Process Tracing with Bayesian Analysis’, in A.Bennett and J.T.Checkel (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 276–98.
6. A.Bennett, and J.T.Checkel, (2015), ‘Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices’, in A.Bennett and J.T.Checkel (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–37.
7. A.Bennett, and C.Elman, (2007), ‘Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield’, Comparative Political Studies, 40 (2), pp. 170–95. doi: 10.1177/0010414006296346
8. A.Bennett, and A.L.George, (1997), Process Tracing in Case Study Research. MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, October 17–19, 1997. Available from: http://www.ciaonet.org/wps/bea03/index.html.
9. J.Blatter, and T.Blume, (2008), ‘In Search of Co-variance, Causal Mechanisms or Congruence? Towards a Plural Understanding of Case Studies’, Swiss Political Science Review, 14 (2), pp. 315–56. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2008.tb00105.x
10. J.Blatter, and M.Haverland, (2012), Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research (Basingstoke: Pagrave Macmillan).
11. J.Blatter,, F.Janning,, and C.Wagemann, (2007), Qualitative Politikanalyse. Eine Einführung in Forschungsansätze und Methoden (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
12. T.Büthe, (2002), ‘Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence’, American Political Science Review, 96 (3), pp. 481–94. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000278
13. J.T.Checkel, (2005), It's the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics. Working Paper No. 26, October 2005. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/arenax/p0206.html.
14. D.Collier, (2010), Process Tracing: Introduction and Exercises. Available from: http://polisci.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/CollierD/Proc%20Trac%20-%20Text%20and%20Story%20-%20Sept%2024.pdf.
15. D.Collier, (2011), ‘Understanding Process Tracing’, PS Political Science & Politics, 44 (4), pp. 823–30. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001429
16. D.Collier,, H.E.Brady,, and J.Seawright, (2004), ‘Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology’, in H.E.Brady and D.Collier (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers), pp. 229–66.
17. Collier, D., Brady H.E., and Seawright, J. (2010), ‘Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology’, in H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield), pp. 161–99.
18. T.Dunning, (2015), ‘Improving Process Tracing. The Case of Multi-Method Research’, in A.Bennett and J.T.Checkel (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 211–36.
19. H.Eckstein, (1975), ‘Case Study and Theory in Political Science’, in F.I.Greenstein and N.W.Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science (Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley), pp. 79–138. Reprint 1992 is quoted.
20. T.G.Falleti, (2006), ‘Theory-Guided Process-Tracing in Comparative Politics: Something Old, Something New’, Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association, 17 (1).
21. Falleti, T.G. and Lynch, J. (2009), ‘Context and Causal Mechanism in Political Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, 42 (9), pp. 1143–66.
22. T.G.Falleti, and J.Mahoney, (2015), ‘The Comparative Sequential Method’, in J.Mahoney and K.Thelen (eds), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis: Resilience, Diversity, and Change (Cambridge: Cambridge UP), pp. 211–39.
23. J.K.Ford,, et al. (1989), ‘Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43 (1), pp. 75–117. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90059-9
24. A.L.George, (1979a), ‘Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison’, in P.G.Lauren (ed.), Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy (New York: Free Press), pp. 43–68.
25. A.L.George, (1979b), ‘The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-Making Behavior: The “Operational Code” Belief System’, in L.S.Falkowski (ed.), Psychological Models in International Politics (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 95–124.
26. A.L.George, (1997), The Role of the Congruence Method for Case Study Research. Available from: http://www.ciaonet.org/wps/gea01/index.html.
27. A.L.George, and A.Bennett, (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in Social Sciences (Cambridge: MIT Press).
28. A.L.George, and T.J.McKeown, (1985), ‘Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making’, in Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, Vol. 2 (Santa Barbara, CA: JAI Press), pp. 21–58.
29. J.Gerring, (2007), Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
30. P.A.Hall, (2003), ‘Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research’, in J.Mahoney and D.Rueschemeyer (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 373–404.
31. P.A.Hall, (2008), ‘Systematic Process Analysis: What it is and how to use it’, European Political Science, 7 (3), pp. 304–17. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210130
32. P.A.Hall, (2013), ‘Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing’, European Political Science, 12 (1), pp. 20–30. doi: 10.1057/eps.2012.6
33. M.Haverland, and J.Blatter, (2012), Two or Three Approaches to Explanatory Case Study Research? APSA 2012 Annual Meeting. Unpublished Paper.
34. G.King,, R.O.Keohane, and S.Verba, (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
35. M.Kreuzer, (2010), ‘Historical Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis: The Case of the Origins of Proportional Representation’, American Political Science Review, 104 (2), pp. 369–92. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000122
36. M.Kreuzer, and R.DeFina, (2015), Look Before You Leap: Bayesian Process Tracing, Test Strength, and Causal Inference. Paper presented at the Institute for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Summer Institute, Syracuse University, June 20–21.
37. A.Lijphart, (1971), ‘Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method’, American Political Science Review, 65 (3), pp. 682–93. doi: 10.2307/1955513
38. D.Little, (1995), ‘Causal Explanation in the Social Sciences’, The Southern Journal of Philiosophy, XXXIV (Suppl.), pp. 31–56.
39. M.Maggetti,, C.Radaelli,, and F.Gilardi, (2012), Designing Research in the Social Sciences (London: Sage).
40. J.Mahoney, (2001), ‘Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method’, Sociological Forum, 16 (3), pp. 575–93. doi: 10.1023/A:1011912816997
41. J.Mahoney, (2004), ‘Comparative-historical Methodology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 30, pp. 81–101. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110507
42. J.Mahoney, (2008), ‘Toward a Unified Theory of Causality’, Comparative Political Studies, 41 (4–5), pp. 412–36. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313115
43. J.Mahoney, (2010), ‘After KKV. The New Methodology of Qualitative Research’, World Politics, 62 (1), pp. 120–47. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109990220
44. J.Mahoney, (2012), ‘The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in Social Sciences’, Sociological Methods & Research, 41 (4), pp. 570–97. doi: 10.1177/0049124112437709
45. J.Mahoney, and G.Goertz, (2006), ‘A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research’, Political Analysis, 14 (3), pp. 227–49. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpj017
46. J.Mahoney, and G.Goertz, (2012), A Tale of Two Cultures. Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
47. R.Mayntz, (2004), ‘Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34 (2), pp. 237–59. doi: 10.1177/0048393103262552
48. L.B.Mohr, (1982), Explaining Organizational Behavior (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
49. A.Moravscik, (2014), ‘Trust, but Verify: The Transparency Revolution and Qualitative International Relations’, Security Studies, 23 (4), pp. 663–88. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2014.970846
50. B.Palier, (2005), ‘Ambiguous Agreement, Cumulative Change: French Social Policy in the 1990s’, in K.Thelen and W.Streeck (eds.), Beyond Continuity, Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 127–44.
51. B.Palier, (2010), A long Good bye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare reforms in Continental Europe (Amsterdam and Chicago: Amsterdam University Press and Chicago University Press).
52. I.Rohlfing, (2012), Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework Research (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
53. F.Schimmelfennig, (2006), ‘Prozessanalyse’, in J.Behnke, T.Gschwend, D.Schindler, and K.-U.Schnapp (eds.), Methoden der Politikwissenschaft (Baden-Baden: Nomos, S), pp. 263–71.
54. F.Schimmelfennig, (2015), ‘Efficient Process Tracing. Analyzing the Causal Mechanisms of European Integration’, in A.Bennett and J.T.Checkel (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 98–125.
55. S.Steinlin, and C.Trampusch, (2012), ‘Institutional Shrinkage: The Deviant Case of Swiss Banking Secrecy’, Regulation & Governance, 6 (2), pp. 242–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01128.x
56. C.G.Thies, (2002), ‘A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Historical Analysis in the Study of International Relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 3 (4), pp. 351–72. doi: 10.1111/1528-3577.t01-1-00099
57. C.Trampusch, (2014), ‘Why Preferences and Institutions Change: A Systematic Process Analysis of Credit Rating in Germany’, European Journal of Political Research, 53 (2), pp. 328–44. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12034
58. A.H.Van de Ven, and M.S.Poole, (2005), ‘Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change’, Organization Studies, 26 (9), pp. 1377–404. doi: 10.1177/0170840605056907
59. S.Van Evera, (1997), Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University).
60. D.Waldner, (2012), ‘Process Tracing and Causal Mechanisms’, in H.Kincaid (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 65–84.
61. D.Waldner, (2015), ‘What Makes Process-tracing Good? Causal Mechanisms, Causal Inference, and the Completeness Standard in Comparative Politics’, in A.Bennett and J.T.Checkel (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 126–52.