The comparative sequential method

Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 211-239

  Falleti, Tulia G ^a   Mahoney, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954213292     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316273104.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Ahmed, Amel. 2013. Democracy and the Politics of Electoral System Choice: EngineeringElectoral Dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Aminzade, Ronald. 1992. “Historical Sociology and Time.” Sociological Methods and Research20:456-80.
4. Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5. Barrenechea, Rodrigo, Edward Gibson, and Larkin Terrie. Forthcoming. “Historical Institutionalism in Democratization Studies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, edited by O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti, and A. Sheingate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Beach, Derek, and Pasmus Brun Pederson. 2013. Process Tracing Methods: Foundations andGuidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Bennett, Andrew. 2008. “Process Tracing: A Bayesian Perspective.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Janet Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier, 217-70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey Checkel, eds. 2015. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to AnalyticTool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bennett, Andrew, and Colin Elman. 2006. “Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence.” Political Analysis14:250-67.
10. Campbell, Donald T. 1975. “‘Degrees of Freedom’ and the Case Study.” Comparative PoliticalStudies8:178-93.
11. Caraway, Teri L. 2004. “Inclusion and Democratization: Class, Gender, Race, and the Extension of Suffrage.” Comparative Politics36 (4): 443-60.
12. Castiglioni, Rossana. 2014. “Paths to Welfare: Class Coalitions, Ideas, and Party Politics in Chile and Uruguay.” Paper presented at the REPAL Annual Conference, Instituto de Ciencia Pollitica, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
13. Chibber, Vivek. 2003. Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Collier, David. 1993. “The Comparative Method.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, edited by Ada Finifter, 105-19. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
15. Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science and Politics44 (4): 823-30.
16. Collier, David, Henry E. Brady, and Jason Seawright. 2010. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., edited by Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 161-99. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
17. Collier, Ruth Berins, and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review75:332-7.
20. Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Falleti, Tulia G. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Falleti, Tulia G., and Julia Lynch. 2009. “Context and Causation in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies49 (9): 1143-66.
23. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1943. Bread and Democracy in Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26. Goldstone, Jack A. 1998. “The Problem of the ‘Early Modern’ World.” Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient41:249-84.
27. Griffin, Larry J. 1992. “Temporality, Events, and Explanation in Historical Sociology: An Introduction.” Sociological Methods and Research20:403-27.
28. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2011. “Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes.” Comparative Political Studies44:1267-97.
29. Hacker, Jacob S. 1998. “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and U.S. Medical Policy.” Studies in American Political Development12 (1): 57-130.
30. Hacker, Jacob S 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hall, Peter A. 2013. “Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing.” European Political Science12:20-30.
32. Humphreys, Macartan, and Alan Jacobs. 2013. “Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Inferences.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
33. Jacobs, Alan M. 2008. “The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment, and the Politics of the Long Term.” British Journal of Political Science38 (2): 193-220.
34. Jacobs, Alan M. 2010. “Policymaking as Political Constraint: Institutional Development in the U.S. Social Security Program.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 94-131. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review99 (3): 435-52.
37. Luebbert, Gregory M. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and thePolitical Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Mahoney, James. 1999. “Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology104 (4): 1154-96.
39. Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society29:507-48.
40. Mahoney, James. 2010. Colonialism and Postcolonial Development: Spanish America in ComparativePerspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Mahoney, James. 2012. “The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methods andResearch41:566-90.
42. McKeown, Timothy J. 1999. “Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry.” International Organization53:161-90.
43. Moore, Barrington Jr, McKeown, Timothy J. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.
44. Onoma, Ato Kwamena. 2010. “The Contradictory Potential of Institutions: The Rise and Decline of Land Documentation in Kenya.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 63-93. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review94:251-67.
46. Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Prasad, Monica. 2012. The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Riofrancos, Thea. 2014. “Contesting Extraction: State-Making, Democracy and Large Scale Mining in Ecuador.” PhD diss., Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
51. Rohlfing, Ingo. 2014. “Comparative Hypothesis Testing via Process Tracing.” Sociological Methods and Research, 43 (4): 606-42.
52. Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2013. “How to Party? Static and Dynamic Party Survival in Latin American Consolidated Democracies.” PhD diss., Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
53. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2003. “Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 305-36. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and John D. Stephens. 1997. “Comparing Historical Sequences - A Powerful Tool for Causal Analysis.” Comparative Social Research17:55-72.
55. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyne Huber Stephens, and John D. Stephens. 1992. CapitalistDevelopment and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics2 (3): 337-63.
57. Sewell, William H. Jr. 1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by Terrence J. McDonald, 245-80. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58. Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Skocpol, Theda. 1999. “Why I Am a Historical Social Scientist.” Extensions: Journal of the Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, pp. 16-19.
60. Smith, Benjamin. 2007. Hard Times in the Lands of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61. Soifer, Hillel David. 2012. “The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures.” Comparative Political Studies45:1572-97.
62. Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63. Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Tannenwald, Nina. 2008. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science2:369-404.
66. Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative-Historical Analysis.” In Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 208-40. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
68. Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. New York: Cambridge University Press.