Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Surgery for Large Laterally Spreading Colorectal Lesions

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 271-278.e2

  Jayanna, Mahesh ^a   Burgess, Nicholas G ^a,b   Singh, Rajvinder ^c   Hourigan, Luke F ^d,e   Brown, Gregor J ^f,g   Zanati, Simon A ^h   Moss, Alan ^h,i   Lim, James ^j   Sonson, Rebecca ^a   Williams, Stephen J ^a   Bourke, Michael J ^a,b  

^a WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b University of Sydney   (Australia)

^c LYELL MCEWIN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e GREENSLOPES PRIVATE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^g EPWORTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^h WESTERN HEALTH   (Australia)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^j SOUTHERN HEALTH   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

AR DRG; Colorectal Surgery; Large Laterally Spreading Lesions; The Australian Colonic Endoscopic Resection (ACE) study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON SURGERY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LATERAL SPREADING COLORECTAL LESION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECURRENCE RISK; REOPERATION; SEPSIS; AGED; COLON; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST; ECONOMICS; PROCEDURES; RECTUM; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COLON; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTUM; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 84958983331     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: 15427714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.037     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brenner H., Kloor M., Pox C.P. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 2014, 383:1490-1502.
2. Zauber A.G., Winawer S.J., O'Brien M.J., et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012, 366:687-696.
3. Soetikno R.M., Kaltenbach T., Rouse R.V., et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008, 299:1027-1035.
4. Moss A., Bourke M.J., Williams S.J., et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:1909-1918.
5. Tan K.K., Koh F.H.X., Tan Y.Y., et al. Long-term outcome following surgery for colorectal cancers in octogenarians: a single institution's experience of 204 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2012, 16:1029-1036.
6. Rex D.K., Kahi C.J., Levin B., et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:1865-1871.
7. Braga M., Vignali A., Zuliani W., et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005, 242:890-895. discussion 895-896.
8. Guillou P.J., Quirke P., Thorpe H., et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 365:1718-1726.
9. Buunen M., Veldkamp R., Hop W.C.J., et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2009, 10:44-52.
10. Moss A., Williams S.J., Hourigan L.F., et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015, 64:57-65.
11. Manfredi S., Piette C., Durand G., et al. Colonoscopy results of a French regional FOBT-based colorectal cancer screening program with high compliance. Endoscopy 2008, 40:422-427.
12. Ahlenstiel G., Hourigan L.F., Brown G., et al. Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2014, 80:668-676.
13. Ohtani H., Tamamori Y., Arimoto Y., et al. A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized con-trolled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer. J Cancer 2011, 2:425-434.
14. Bhalla A., Williams J.P., Hurst N.G., et al. One-third of patients fail to return to work 1 year after surgery for colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2014, 18:1153-1159.
15. Onken J.E., Friedman J.Y., Subramanian S., et al. Treatment patterns and costs associated with sessile colorectal polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:2896-2901.
16. Overhiser A.J., Rex D.K. Work and resources needed for endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:1076-1079.
17. Repici A., Hassan C., Pessoa D.D.P., et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2012, 44:137-147.
18. Arezzo A., Passera R., Saito Y., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 2014, 28:427-438.
19. Bourke M.J., Neuhaus H. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: when and by whom?. Endoscopy 2014, 46:677-679.