A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized con-trolled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer

Journal of Cancer

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 425-434

  Ohtani, Hiroshi ^a   Tamamori, Yutaka ^a   Arimoto, Yuichi ^a   Nishiguchi, Yukio ^b   Maeda, Kiyoshi ^c   Hirakawa, Kosei ^c  

^a Osaka City Sumiyoshi Hospital   (Japan)

^b OSAKA CITY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopy assisted colorectal surgery; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84857820855     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18379664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7150/jca.2.425     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. [Internet] WHO. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/.
2. [Internet] National Cancer Institute. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/commoncancers.
3. [Internet] Cancer Research UK. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/bowel/incidence/.
4. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1: 144-150.
5. Schwenk W, Böhm B, Müller JM. Postoperative pain and fa-tigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12: 1131-1136.
6. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 1111-1124.
7. Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006; 21: 652-656.
8. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopi-cally assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 1638-1645.
9. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3061-3068.
10. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparosco-py-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 359: 2224-2229.
11. Araujo SE, da Silva e Sousa AH Jr, de Campos FG, et al. Con-ventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003; 58: 133-140.
12. Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 1180-1186.
13. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50: 464-471.
14. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center ran-domized trial. Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 890-896.
15. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 2217-2223.
16. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, ran-domised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365: 1718-1726.
17. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparo-scopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10: 44-52.
18. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Colon cancer Laparo-scopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term out-comes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 477-484.
19. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A com-parison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2050-2059.
20. Curet MJ, Putrakul K, Pitcher DE, et al. Laparoscopically as-sisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: perioperative results and long-term outcome. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14: 1062-1066.
21. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004; 363: 1187-1192.
22. Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, et al. Oncologic results of laparo-scopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14: 109-117.
23. Mirza MS, Longman RJ, Farrokhyar F, et al. Long-term out-comes for laparoscopic versus open resection of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008; 18: 679-685.
24. Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. Laparoscopic resection of ex-traperitoneal rectal cancer: a comparative analysis with open resection. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 1818-1824.
25. Kaiser AM, Kang JC, Chan LS, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004; 14: 329-334.
26. Stage JG, Schulze S, Møller P, et al. Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adeno-carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 391-396.
27. Milsom JW, Böhm B, Hammerhofer KA, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 187: 46-55.
28. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1211-1215.
29. Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, et al. Wound com-plications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16: 1420-1425.
30. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 2217-2223.
31. Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;:CD003432.
32. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188.
33. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T, et al. A Meta-analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Results of Randomized Controlled Trials That Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Conventional Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; [Epub ahead of print].
34. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, et al. Transatlantic Laparoscop-ically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Lapa-roscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a me-ta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142: 298-303.
35. Lim SW, Cho SH, Oh BR, et al. Port-site recurrence after lapa-roscopy-assisted low anterior resection: the sign of peritoneal dissemination. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
36. Dowson H, Cowie A, Ballard K, et al. Systematic Review of Quality of Life following Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008; [Epub ahead of print].