Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: Results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study

Gut

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 57-65

  Moss, Alan ^a,b   Williams, Stephen J ^a   Hourigan, Luke F ^d   Brown, Gregor ^c,e   Tam, William ^f   Singh, Rajvinder ^f   Zanati, Simon ^b,e   Burgess, Nicholas G ^a,g   Sonson, Rebecca ^a   Byth, Karen ^h   Bourke, Michael J ^a,g  

^a WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c EPWORTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f LYELL MCEWIN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^g University of Sydney   (Australia)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED COLONIC MUCOSAL NEOPLASIA; AGED; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATION; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COLON ADENOMA; COLON PERFORATION; COLON TUMOR; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NARROW BAND IMAGING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECURRENCE RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TUMOR RECURRENCE; WIDE FIELD ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; ADENOMA; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON RESECTION; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUSTRALIA; COLECTOMY; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84919774809     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305516     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1909-18.
2. Manfredi S, Piette C, Durand G, et al. Colonoscopy results of a French regional FOBT-based colorectal cancer screening program with high compliance. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 422-7.
3. Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 100-7.
4. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, et al. Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 966-73.
5. Ahlenstiel G, Hourigan LF, Brown GJ, et al. Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 119-26.
6. Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 660-7.
7. Bourke MJ Current status of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection in the West and the interface with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Digestive Endoscopy 2009; 21 (Suppl. 1):S27-32.
8. Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S, et al. Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1128-36.
9. Onken JE, Friedman JY, Subramanian S, et al. Treatment patterns and costs associated with sessile colorectal polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2896-901.
10. McNicol L, Story DA, Leslie K, et al. Postoperative complications and mortality in older patients having non-cardiac surgery at three Melbourne teaching hospitals. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 447-52.
11. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1128-37.
12. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117-27.
13. Bergman JJ How to justify endoscopic submucosal dissection in the Western world. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 988-90.
14. Khashab M, Eid E, Rusche M, et al. Incidence and predictors of "late" recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 344-9.
15. Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 255-63.
16. Arebi N, Swain D, Suzuki N, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 859-66.
17. Church JM Experience in the endoscopic management of large colonic polyps. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 988-95.
18. Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF, et al. EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 234-41.
19. Bergmann U, Beger HG. Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 475-9.
20. Doniec JM, Lohnert MS, Schniewind B, et al. Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 340-8.
21. Bassan MS, Holt B, Moss A, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 90-5.
22. Bourke MJ Endoscopic Mucosal resection in the colon: a practical Guide. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011; 13: 35-49.
23. Alexander S, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. EMR of large, sessile, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas: technical aspects and long-term outcome (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 66-73.
24. Hopper AD, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Giant laterally spreading tumors of the papilla: endoscopic features, resection technique, and outcome (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 967-75.
25. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Kwan V, et al. Succinylated gelatin substantially increases en bloc resection size in colonic EMR: a randomized, blinded trial in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 589-95.
26. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Metz AJ. A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2375-82.
27. Holt BA, Bourke MJ. Wide field endoscopic resection for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia: current status and future directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 969-79.
28. Repici A, Pellicano R, Strangio G, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early colorectal neoplasia: pathologic basis, procedures, and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1502-15.
29. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society task force on colorectal cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1872-85.
30. Fujiya M, Moriichi K, Saitoh Y, et al. Endoscopic piecemeal resection is a practical option to cure colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 2009; 21(SUPPL. 1):S28-30.
31. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, et al. Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 371-5.
32. Elta GH What is a defiant polyp and how good are we at removing them? Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 264-6.