Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity

Political Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 283-301

  Chadwick, Andrew ^a,b  

^a Department of Politics and International Relations ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blogs; Campaigns; Digital network repertoires; Hybridity; Interest groups; Internet; Mobilization; Organizations; Political parties; Social movements

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547871295     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600701471666     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Adbusters. (2004). Black spot sneaker. Retrieved June 10, 2004, from http://www.black-spotsneaker.org/
2. ATTAC International. (2006). Statement on homepage of ATTAC International Web site. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://archive.attac.org/indexen/index. html
3. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
4. Bennett, W. L. (2003a). Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication and Society, 6, 143-168.
5. Bennett, W. L. (2003b). New media power: The Internet and global activism. In N. Couldry & J. Curran (Eds.), Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world (pp. 17-37). Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
6. Bennett, W. L. (2004). Branded political communication: Lifestyle politics, logo campaigns and the rise of global citizenship. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (Eds.), Politics, products and markets: Exploring political consumerism, past and present (pp. 101-125). London: Transaction.
7. Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15, 365-388.
9. Brainard, L., & Siplon, P. (2002). Cyberspace challenges to mainstream nonprofit health organizations. Administration and Society, 34, 141-175.
10. Brown, J. (1998). MoveOn moves offline. Salon. Retrieved April 28, 2004, from http://archive.salon.com/21st/log/1998/10/27log.html
11. Burstein, P. (1998). Interest organizations, political parties, and the study of democratic politics. In A. N. Costain & A. S. McFarland (Eds.), Social movements and American political institutions (pp. 39-56). Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
12. Burstein, P., & Linton, A. (2002). The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy: Some recent evidence and theoretical concerns. Social Forces, 81, 381-408.
13. Calabrese, A. (2004). Stealth regulation: Moral meltdown and political radicalism at the Federal Communications Commission. New Media and Society, 6, 106-113.
14. Cammaerts, B., & Van Audenhove, L. (2005). Online political debate, unbounded citizenship, and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere. Political Communication, 22, 179-196.
15. Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity: The information age: Economy, society and culture Volume II (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
16. Chadwick, A. (2005). The Internet, political mobilization and organizational hybridity: "Deanspace", MoveOn.org and the 2004 US presidential campaign. Retrieved October 20, 2006, from http://www.psa.ac.uk/ journals/pdf/5/2005/Chadwick.pdf
17. Chroust, P. (2000). Neo-Nazis and Taliban online: Anti-modern, political movements and modern media. In P. Ferdinand (Ed.), The Internet, democracy and democratization (pp. 102-118). London: Frank Cass.
18. Clausing, J. (1999). Anti-impeachment Website tallies millions in pledges. New York Times. Retrieved April 28, 2004, from http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/CPC/archive/campaigns/move-on-website-gets- pledges.html
19. Cleaver, H. (1998). The Zapatista effect: The Internet and the rise of an alternative political fabric. Journal of International Affairs, 51, 621-640.
20. Cooper, J., & Harrison, D. M. (2001). The social organization of audio piracy on the Internet. Media, Culture and Society, 23, 71-90.
21. Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, W. R., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.), (2005). Social movements and organization theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Dodson, S., & Hammersley, B. (2003). The Web's candidate for president. The Guardian. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,,1109028.html
23. Flanagin, A. J., Stohl, C., & Bimber, B. (2006). Modeling the structure of collective action. Communication Monographs, 73, 29-54.
24. Garrido, M., & Halavais, A. (2003). Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement: Applying social-networks analysis to study contemporary social movements. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 165-184). London: Routledge.
25. Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 555-596.
26. Gillmor, D. (2004). We the media: Grassroots journalism, by the people, for the people. Cambridge, England: O'Reilly.
27. Greenwald, R. (2006). Robert Greenwald's blog. Retrieved March 27, 2006, from http://www.robertgreenwald.org/
28. Gurak, L. J. (1997). Persuasion and privacy in cyberspace: The online protests over Lotus Market-Place and the Clipper Chip. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Gurak, L. J., & Logie, J. (2003). Internet protests, from text to Web. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 25-46). London: Routledge.
30. Hardy, I. (2004). Web campaigning. BBC World News. Retrieved July 30, 2004, from http://bbcworld.com/content/clickonline_archive_26_2004.asp? pageid=666&co_pageid=3
31. Hickey, R. (2004). Onward Deaniacs. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.tompaine.com/Archive/scontent/10111.html
32. Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. London: Allen Lane.
33. Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? London: Routledge.
34. Justice, G. (2004a). Clicking into the Kerry coffers for a one-day online record. New York Times. Retrieved July 30, 2004, from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/politics/campaign/02donate.html?ex= 1246593600&en=379352858367d47d&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland
35. Justice, G. (2004b). Fund-raising: Kerry kept money coming with the Internet as his ATM. New York Times. Retrieved November 7, 2004, from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/06/politics/campaign/06internet.html?ex= 1100760171&ei=1&en=feeca50af99bab47
36. Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2004). New media and Internet activism: From the battle of Seattle to blogging. New Media and Society, 6, 87-95.
37. Krim, J. (2005). FCC chief must work out details. Washington Post. Retrieved January 24, 2005, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/ A27673-2005Jan21.html
38. Lasn, K. (2000). Culture jam: The uncooling of America. New York: William Morrow.
39. Leizerov, S. (2000). Privacy advocacy groups versus Intel: A case study of how social movements are tactically using the Internet to fight corporations. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 461-483.
40. Lin, W., & Dutton, W. H. (2003). The "net" effect in politics: The "Stop the Overlay" campaign in Los Angeles. Party Politics, 9, 124-136.
41. McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. McCarthy, J. D. (1996). Constraints and opportunities in adopting, adapting and inventing. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 141-151). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. McChesney, R. W. (2004). The problem of the media: US communication politics in the 21st century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
44. McCullagh, D. (2004). The cyberbrains behind Howard Dean. CNet News Online. Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://news.com.com/2008-1028- 5142066.html
45. Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the Internet. London: Routledge.
46. Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Century Hutchinson.
47. MoveOn. (2006). About the MoveOn family of organizations. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.moveon.org/about.html
48. MoveOn Political Action Committee. (2004). Statement of purpose. Retrieved June 8, 2004, from http://www.moveonpac.org/whoweare.html
49. MoveOn Voter Fund. (2004). Bush in 30 seconds campaign. Retrieved March 27, 2006, from http://www.bushin30seconds.org/150
50. Peretti, J., with Micheletti, M. (2004). The Nike sweatshop email: Political consumerism, Internet and culture jamming. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (Eds.), Politics, products and markets: Exploring political consumerism, past and present (pp. 127-142). London: Transaction.
51. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2005). The Dean activists: Their profile and prospects. Washington, DC: Author.
52. Pickerill, J. (2003). Cyberprotest: Environmental activism online. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
53. Pickerill, J. (2004). Rethinking political participation: Experiments in Internet activism in Australia and Britain. In R. K. Gibson, A. Rommele, & S. J. Ward (Eds.), Electronic democracy: Mobilization, organization and participation via new ICTs (pp. 170-193). London: Routledge.
54. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
55. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. London: Perseus.
56. Save Our Environment Coalition. (2004). Save Our Environment Action Center. Retrieved June 7, 2004, from http://www.saveourenvironment.org/
57. Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2002). Online structure for political action: Exploring presidential campaign Websites from the 2000 American election. Javnost/The Public, 9(2), 43-60.
58. Scott, A., & Street, J. (2000). From media politics to e-protest: The use of popular culture and new media in parties and social movements. Information, Communication and Society, 3, 215-240.
59. Shirky, C. (2004). Exiting Deanspace. Corante. Retrieved July 29, 2004, from http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2004/02/03/exiting_deanspace.php
60. Singel, R. (2004). Net politics down but not out. Wired News. Retrieved February 2, 2004, from http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283, 62123,00.html
61. Smith, J. (2001). Globalizing resistance: The battle of Seattle and the future of social movements. Mobilization, 6, 1-20.
62. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. Morris & C. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63. Soar, M. (2002). The first things first manifesto and the politics of culture jamming: Towards a cultural economy of graphic design and advertising. Cultural Studies, 16, 570-592.
64. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000a). Democratizing democracy: Strong democracy, US political campaigns and the Internet. In P. Ferdinand (Ed.), The Internet, democracy and democratization. London: Frank Cass.
65. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000b). Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50, 111-132.
66. Suellentrop, C. (2003). Peer-to-peer politics: Should Howard Dean be a little bit afraid of the Internet? Slate. Retrieved March 27, 2006, from http://www.slate.com/id/2085610
67. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. London: Addison Wesley.
69. Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Tilly, C. (1995). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758-1834. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of contention (pp. 15-42). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
71. Traugott, M. (Ed.). (1995). Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
72. Trippi, J. (2004). The revolution will not be televised: Democracy, the Internet and the overthrow of everything. New York: Regan Books.
73. Van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (Eds.). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. London: Routledge.
74. Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism: The case of cyberprotests against the World Bank. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers. (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 71-95). London: Routledge.
75. Von Drehle, D. (2003). From screen savers to progressive savior. Washington Post. Retrieved June 8, 2004, from http://www.washingtonpost. com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A14925-2003Jun4¬Found=true
76. Whine, M. (2000). Far right extremists on the Internet. In D. Thomas & B. Loader (Eds.), Cybercrime: Law enforcement, security and surveillance in the information age (pp. 234-250). London: Routledge.
77. Wolf, G. (2004). How the Internet invented Howard Dean. Wired. Retrieved July 29, 2004, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.01/dean.html
78. Zetter, K. (2004). Blogs counter political plottings. Wired News. Retrieved July 29, 2004, from http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,63334, 00.html