Purity homophily in social networks

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 145, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 366-375

  Dehghani, Morteza ^a   Johnson, Kate ^b   Hoover, Joe ^b   Sagi, Eyal ^c   Garten, Justin ^a   Parmar, Niki Jitendra ^a   Vaisey, Stephen ^d   Iliev, Rumen ^e   Graham, Jesse ^b  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational social science; Homophily; Morality; Social networks

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MORALITY; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MORALS; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84958838618     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000139     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26, 1531-1542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
2. Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
3. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
4. Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0044721
5. Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156-2160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
6. Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?: Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 1247-1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014
7. Chakroff, A., & Young, L. (2015). Harmful situations, impure people: An attribution asymmetry across moral domains. Cognition, 136, 30-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.034
8. Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 70(6), 066111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
9. Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on Moral Foundations Theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1178-1198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2
10. Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal: Complex Systems, 1695, 1-9.
11. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Landauer, T., & Furnas, G. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 41, 391-407.
12. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112, 281-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.008
13. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 477-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029065
14. Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Kern, M. L., Park, G., Labarthe, D. R., Merchant, R. M.,.. Seligman, M. E. (2015). Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality. Psychological Science, 26, 159-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614557867
15. Graham, J. (2014). Morality beyond the lab. Science, 345, 1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259500
16. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
17. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
18. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555
19. Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613
20. Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017423
21. Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2002). Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67, 165-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088891
22. Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2014). Explaining why more Americans have no religious preference: Political backlash and generational succession, 1987-2012. Sociological Science, 1, 423-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.15195/v1.a24
23. Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network1. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 405-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/599247
24. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
25. Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2013). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
26. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18, 18-66.
27. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423-1425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382788
28. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
29. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50, 885-900.
30. Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.010
31. Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC [Computer software]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
32. Pew Research. (n.d.). Political polarization in the American public. -Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/6-12-2014-Political-Polarization-Release.pdf
33. Preston, J. L., & Ritter, R. S. (2012). Cleanliness and godliness: Mutual association between two kinds of personal purity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1365-1368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.015
34. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (vol. 1). California: Sage.
35. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & Fincher, K. (2009). Psychology. From oral to moral. Science, 323, 1179-1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1170492
36. Sagi, E., Dehghani, M. (2014). Measuring moral rhetoric in text. Social Science Computer Review, 32, 132-144.
37. Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895-917.
38. Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 5, 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3001913
39. Vaisey, S., & Lizardo, O. (2010). Can Cultural worldviews influence network composition? Social Forces: A Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation, 88, 1595-1618.
40. Vapnik, V. (2000). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1