Institutional and regional factors behind university patenting in Europe: An exploratory spatial analysis using EUMIDA data

Knowledge, Diversity and Performance in European Higher Education: A Changing Landscape

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 167-204

  Varga, Attila ^a   Horváth, Márton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958650688     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781783472000.00013     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Academic Ranking of World Universities (2008), ‘Academic ranking of world universities - 2008', accessed 1 June 2012 at http://www.arwu.org/ARWU2008.jsp.
2. Acosta, M., D. Coronado and M.A. Martínez (2012), ‘Spatial differences in the quality of university patenting: do regions matter?', Research Policy, 41(4), 692-703.
3. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (2011), ‘US and Canadian licensing activity surveys - quantitative data and real-world examples about licensing activities at US and Canadian universities, hospitals and research institutions’, Association of University Technology Managers.
4. Azagra-Caro, J.M., I.F. de Lucio and A.G. Gracia (2003),‘University patents:output and input indicators… of what?', Research Evaluation, 12(1), 5-16.
5. Azagra-Caro, J., D. Pontikakis and A. Varga (2013), ‘Absorptive capacity and the delocalisation of university-industry interaction. Evidence from participation in the EU’s Sixth Framework Programme for Research’, European Planning Studies, 21(10), 1676-701.
6. Bonaccorsi, A., T. Brandt, D. De Filippi, B. Lepori, F. Molinari, A. Niederl, U. Schmoch, T. Schubert and S. Slipersaeter (2010), Feasibility Study for Creating European University Data Collection. Final Study Report, European Commission, Research Directorate - General, Directorate C - European Research Area, Universities and Researches, accessed 31 August 2013 at http:// ec.europa.eu/research/era/docs/en/eumida-final- report. pdf.
7. Carlsson, B. and A. Fridh (2002), ‘Technology transfer in United States universities:a survey and statistical analysis’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1/2), 199-232.
8. Coupé, T. (2003), ‘Science is golden: academic R&D and university patents’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 31-46.
9. Erdős, K. and A. Varga (2012), ‘The academic entrepreneur: myth or reality for increased regional growth in Europe?', in M. van Geenhuizen and P. Nijkamp (eds), Creative Knowledge Cities, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 157-81.
10. Feldman, M. (1994), ‘The university and economic development: the case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore’, Economic Development Quarterly, 8(1), 67-76.
11. Fini, R., R. Grimaldi, S. Santoni and M. Sobrero (2011), ‘Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs’, Research Policy, 40(8), 1113-27.
12. Friedman, J. and J. Silberman (2003), ‘University technology transfer: do incentives, management and location matter?', Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
13. Giuliani, E. and V. Arza (2009), ‘What drives the formation of valuable university- industry linkages? Insights from the wine industry’, Research Policy, 38(6), 906-921.
14. Goldstein, H. (2002), ‘Universities as regional growth engines: the case of the research triangle of North Carolina’, in A. Varga and L. Szerb (eds), Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Economic Development: International Experiences and Hungarian Challenges, Pécs, Hungary: University of Pécs Press, pp. 208-31.
15. Gulbrandsen, M. and S. Slipersaeter (2007), ‘The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model’, in A. Bonaccorsi and C. Daraio (eds), Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance In Europe, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 112-43.
16. Hollanders H., S. Tarantola and A. Loschky (2009), ‘Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS) 2009', accessed 25 September 2013 at http://ec.europa.eu/ enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ris-2009_ en.pdf.
17. Koo, J. (2007), ‘Determinants of localized technology spillovers: role of regional and industrial attributes’, Regional Studies, 41(7), 995-1011.
18. Lach, S. and M. Schankerman (2004), ‘Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2/3), 252-64.
19. Landry, R., N. Amara and M. Ouimet (2007), ‘Determinants of knowledge transfer:evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6), 561-92.
20. Louis, K.S., D. Blumenthal, M.E. Gluck and M.A. Stoto (1989), ‘Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-31.
21. National Science Foundation (2010), ‘NSF survey of research and development expenditures at universities and colleges/higher education research and development’, National Science Foundation.
22. Pike, A., A. Rodríguez-Pose and J. Tomaney (eds) (2011), Handbook of Local and Regional Development, London: Routledge.
23. Ponomariov, B.L. (2008), ‘Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5), 485-503.
24. Renault, C. (2006), ‘Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227-39.
25. Rogers, E., M.S. Takegami and J. Yin (2001), ‘Lessons learned about technology transfer’, Technovation, 21(4), 253-61.
26. Rogers, E.M., J. Yin and J. Hoffmann (2000), ‘Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at US research universities’, The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 12, 47-80.
27. Saragossi, S. and B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2003), ‘What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 47-51.
28. Saxenian, A.L. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Schartinger, D., C. Rammer, M. Fischer and J. Frohlich (2002), ‘Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants’, Research Policy, 31(3), 303-28.
30. Sebestyén, T. and A. Varga (2012), ‘Research productivity and the quality of interregional knowledge networks’, KRTI Working Paper No. 2012/2, accessed 31 August 2012 at http://www.krti.ktk.pte.hu/files/tiny_mce/File/MT/201202.pdf.
31. Siegel, D.S., D.A. Waldmann and A.N. Link (2003), ‘Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study’, Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
32. Van Looy, B., M. Ranga, J. Callaert, K. Debackere and E. Zimmermann (2004), ‘Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?', Research Policy, 33(3), 425-41.
33. Varga, Attila (1998), University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfers, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Varga, A. (2000), ‘Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity’, Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 289-309.
35. Varga, A. (ed.) (2009), Universities, Knowledge Transfer and Regional Development:Geography, Entrepreneurship and Policy, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
36. Varga, A., L. Anselin and Z. Acs (2005), ‘Regional innovation in the US over space and time’, in M. Gunther and S. Sabine (eds), Spillovers and Innovation:City, Environment, and the Economy. Interdisciplinary Studies in Economics and Management, Vienna: Springer, pp. 93-104.
37. Varga, A., D. Pontikakis and G. Chorafakis (2013), ‘Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity’, Journal of Economic Geography, doi:10.1093/ jeg/lbs04 (forthcoming).
38. Wicksteed W., E. Autio, C. Doel, E. Garnsey, C. Green and K. Peters (2000), The Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited, Cambridge, UK: Segal Quince Wicksteed.