Locking in loss: Baselines of decline in Australian biodiversity offset policies

Biological Conservation

Volumn 192, Issue , 2015, Pages 504-512

  Maron, Martine ^a   Bull, Joseph W ^b   Evans, Megan C ^c   Gordon, Ascelin ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biodiversity offsets; Conservation policy; Counterfactuals; Crediting baselines; Deforestation; Policy evaluation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DEFORESTATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY STRATEGY; TRAJECTORY; VEGETATION DYNAMICS; WOODY PLANT;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84958646953     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ABARES, 2010. Land Use of Australia, Version 4, 2005/2006. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics - Bureau of Rural Sciences (ABARE-BRS), Canberra.
2. Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, 2015a. Environmental Offsets Policy. ACT Government, Canberra.
3. Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, 2015b. Environmental Offsets Calculator Assessment Methodology. ACT Government, Canberra.
4. Angelsen A. How do we set the reference levels for REDD payments. Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2008, 53-64.
5. Bayon R., Jenkins M. The business of biodiversity. Nature 2010, 466:184-185.
6. Brinck E., Frost C. Evaluation of amendments used to prevent sodification of irrigated fields. Appl. Geochem. 2009, 24:2113-2122.
7. Brown M.A., Clarkson B.D., Stephens R.T., Barton B.J. Compensating for ecological harm-the state of play in New Zealand. New Zeal. J. Ecol. 2014, 38.
8. Brownlie S., Botha M. Biodiversity offsets: adding to the conservation estate, or 'no net loss'?. Impact Asses. Proj. Appraisal 2009, 27:227-231.
9. Bull J., Gordon A., Law E., Suttle K., Milner-Gulland E. Importance of baseline specification in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of Biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 28:799-809.
10. Bull J., Milner-Gulland E., Suttle K., Singh N. Comparing biodiversity offset calculation methods with a case study in Uzbekistan. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 178:2-10.
11. Bunn D.A., Moyle P.B., Johnson C.K. Maximizing the ecological contribution of conservation banks. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2014, 38:377-385.
12. COAG Standing Council on Environment and Water, 2012. Australia's Native Vegetation Framework. Australian Government, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra.
13. Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Environmental Offsets Policy, Department of Sustainability, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/publications/epbc-act-environmental-offsets-policy.
14. Costa P.M., Stuart M., Pinard M., Phillips G. Elements of a certification system for forestry-based carbon offset projects. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change 2000, 5:39-50.
15. Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 2013. Native Vegetation Gain Scoring Manual Version 1, p. 76, Melbourne. <> (accessed 14.11.14). http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/environment-and-wildlife/biodiversity/native-vegetation/native-vegetation-permitted-clearing-regulations/native-vegetation-offsets.
16. Downs P., Singer M., Orr B., Diggory Z., Church T. Restoring ecological integrity in highly regulated rivers: the role of baseline data and analytical references. Environ. Manage. 2011, 48:847-864.
17. Ferraro P.J. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. New Dir. Eval. 2009, 79-84.
18. Ferraro P.J., Pattanayak S.K. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:482-488.
19. Fox J., Nino-Murcia A. Status of species conservation banking in the united states. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:996-1007.
20. Furby, S., 2002. Land cover change : specifications for remote sensing analysis. National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report No. 9. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
21. Gardner T.A., HASE A., Brownlie S., Ekstrom J.M., Pilgrim J.D., Savy C.E., Stephens R.T., Treweek J., Ussher G.T., Ward G. Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:1254-1264.
22. Gibbons P., Briggs S., Ayers D., Seddon J., Doyle S., Cosier P., McElhinny C., Pelly V., Roberts K. An operational method to assess impacts of land clearing on terrestrial biodiversity. Ecol. Ind. 2009, 9:26-40.
23. Gibbons P., Lindenmayer D.B. Offsets for land clearing: no net loss or the tail wagging the dog?. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2007, 8:26-31.
24. Golding L.A., Timperley M.H., Evans C.W. Non-lethal responses of the freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum to dissolved arsenic. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1997, 47:239-254.
25. Gordon A., Bull J.W., Wilcox C., Maron M. Perverse incentives risk undermining biodiversity offset policies. J. Appl. Ecol. 2015, 52:532-537.
26. Gordon A., Langford W.T., Todd J.A., White M.D., Mullerworth D.W., Bekessy S.A. Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26:1481-1488.
27. Herold, M., Angelsen, A., Verchot, L.V., Wijaya, A., Ainembabazi, J.H., 2012. A stepwise framework for developing REDD+ reference levels, In Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. Eds A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L. Verchot, p. 279. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
28. Ingram J.C., Dawson T.P. Forest cover, condition, and ecology in human-impacted forests, south-eastern Madagascar. Conserv. Soc. 2006, 4:194.
29. Kormos R., Kormos C.F., Humle T., Lanjouw A., Rainer H., Victurine R., Mittermeier R.A., Diallo M.S., Rylands A.B., Williamson E.A. Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e111671.
30. Mann C., Voss J.P., Simons A., Melung N., Runge T. Challenging Futures of Biodiversity Offsets and Banking: Critical Issues for Robust Forms of Biodiversity Conservation 2014, Technische Universitat Berlin, Berlin.
31. Maron M., Hobbs R.J., Moilanen A., Matthews J.W., Christie K., Gardner T.A., Keith D.A., Lindenmayer D.B., McAlpine C.A. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155:141-148.
32. Maron M., Rhodes J.R., Gibbons P. Calculating the benefit of conservation actions. Conserv. Lett. 2013, 6:359-367.
33. McKenney B.A., Kiesecker J.M. Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks. Environ. Manage. 2010, 45:165-176.
34. Meineri E., Deville A.S., Grémillet D., Gauthier-Clerc M., Béchet A. Combining correlative and mechanistic habitat suitability models to improve ecological compensation. Biol. Rev. 2014.
35. Miteva D.A., Pattanayak S.K., Ferraro P.J. Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: what works and what doesn't?. Oxford Rev. Econ. Pol. 2012, 28:69-92.
36. OECD, 2008. Environmental Performance Review: Australia, ed. OECD.
37. Overton J.M., Stephens R.T., Ferrier S. Net present biodiversity value and the design of biodiversity offsets. Ambio 2013, 42:100-110.
38. Papworth S., Rist J., Coad L., Milner-Gulland E. Evidence for shifting baseline syndrome in conservation. Conserv. Lett. 2009, 2:93-100.
39. Parkes D., Newell G., Cheal D. Assessing the quality of native vegetation: the 'habitat hectares' approach. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2003, 4:S29-S38.
40. Pauly D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10:430.
41. Pawliczek J., Sullivan S. Conservation and concealment in SpeciesBanking.com, USA: an analysis of neoliberal performance in the species offsetting industry. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38:435-444.
42. Quetier, F., Van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Pilgrim, J.D., von Hase, A., ten Kate, K., 2015. Biodiversity offsets are one solution to widespread poorly-compensated biodiversity loss - a response to Curran et al. Ecological Applications (submitted for publication).
43. Rainey H.J., Pollard E.H.B., Dutson G., Ekstrom J.M.M., Livingstone S.R., Temple H.J., Pilgrim J.D. A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity. Oryx FirstView 2014, 1-7.
44. Salzman J., Ruhl J.B. Gaming the past: the theory and practice of historic baselines in the administrative state. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2010, 1-57.
45. Sonter L., Barrett D., Soares-Filho B. Offsetting the impacts of mining to achieve no net loss of native vegetation. Conserv. Biol. 2014.
46. Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority, 2013. Guidelines for the use of Biodiversity Offsets in the local planning approval process. Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority, Hobart. <> (accessed 14.11.14). http://www.kingborough.tas.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Biodiversity%20Offset%20Guidelines_Final_April2013.pdf.
47. State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage, 2014a. Framework for Biodiversity Assessment. Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney. <> (accessed 14.11.14). http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/biodivoffsets/140675fba.htm.
48. State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage, 2014b. NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects. Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney. <> (accessed 14.11.14). http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/biodivoffsets/140675fba.htm.
49. State of NSW and the Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW, 2008. BioBanking Assessment Methodology. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW, Sydney. <> (accessed 14.11.14). http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/biobanking/assessmethodology.htm.
50. State of the Environment Committee, 2011. Australia state of the environment 2011. Independent report to the Australian Government Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. DSEWPaC, Canberra.
51. Taylor M., Dickman C. NSW native vegetation act saves Australian wildlife 2014, WWF-Australia, Sydney, Australia.
52. Temple H., Anstee S., Ekstrom J., Pilgrim J., Rabenantoandro J., Ramanamanjato J., Randriatafika F., Vincelette M. Forecasting the Path Towards a Net Positive Impact on Biodiversity for Rio Tinto QMM 2012, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
53. The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Heritage Protection), 2014. Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy (Version 1.0). <> (accessed 14.11.14). https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/pollution/management/offsets/.
54. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 2003. Guidance for the Establishment, Use, and Operation of Conservation Banks. United States Department of the Interior.
55. Virah-Sawmy M., Ebeling J., Taplin R. Mining and biodiversity offsets: a transparent and science-based approach to measure "no-net-loss". J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 143:61-70.
56. Whiteman G., Dorsey M., Wittneben B. Businesses and biodiversity: they would say that. Nature 2010, 466:435.
57. Wilcove D.S., Lee J. Using economic and regulatory incentives to restore endangered species: lessons learned from three new programs. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:639-645.
58. Wilson K., Pressey R.L., Newton A., Burgman M., Possingham H., Weston C. Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environ. Manage. 2005, 35:527-543.
59. Yates C.J., Hobbs R.J. Temperate eucalypt woodlands: a review of their status, processes threatening their persistence and techniques for restoration. Aust. J. Bot. 1997, 45:949-973.