메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1739-1741

Biodiversity offsets are one solution to widespread poorly compensated biodiversity loss: A response to Curran et al.

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

EID: 84941213162     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19395582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/14-1217.1     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (18)

References (20)
  • 2
    • 84875332029 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program, Washington, D.C., USA
    • BBOP. 2012. Resource paper: limits to what can be offset. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program, Washington, D.C., USA. http://bbop.forest-trends.org/guidelines/Resource-Paper-Limits.pdf
    • (2012) Resource Paper: Limits to What Can Be Offset
    • BBOP1
  • 4
    • 84875361714 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biodiversity tradeoffs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making: Can we stop the loss?
    • Brownlie, S., N. King, and J. Treweek. 2013. Biodiversity tradeoffs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making: can we stop the loss? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 31(1):24-33.
    • (2013) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , vol.31 , Issue.1 , pp. 24-33
    • Brownlie, S.1    King, N.2    Treweek, J.3
  • 5
    • 84900462436 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Importance of baseline specifications in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of biodiversity
    • Bull, J. W., A. Gordon, E. A. Law, K. B. Suttle, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2014. Importance of baseline specifications in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 28(3):799-809.
    • (2014) Conservation Biology , vol.28 , Issue.3 , pp. 799-809
    • Bull, J.W.1    Gordon, A.2    Law, E.A.3    Suttle, K.B.4    Milner-Gulland, E.J.5
  • 7
    • 77953018255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines
    • Butchart, S. H. M., et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164-1168.
    • (2010) Science , vol.328 , pp. 1164-1168
    • Butchart, S.H.M.1
  • 8
    • 84903537497 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
    • Curran, M., S. Hellweg, and J. Beck. 2014. Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy? Ecological Applications 24:617-632.
    • (2014) Ecological Applications , vol.24 , pp. 617-632
    • Curran, M.1    Hellweg, S.2    Beck, J.3
  • 9
    • 84897062272 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss
    • Gardner, T. A., et al. 2013. Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss. Conservation Biology 27(6):1254-1264.
    • (2013) Conservation Biology , vol.27 , Issue.6 , pp. 1254-1264
    • Gardner, T.A.1
  • 10
    • 79955113914 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation
    • Hanski, I. 2011. Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40:248-255.
    • (2011) Ambio , vol.40 , pp. 248-255
    • Hanski, I.1
  • 11
    • 84855932770 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Building the evidence base for ecological impact assessment and mitigation
    • Hill, D., and R. Arnold. 2012. Building the evidence base for ecological impact assessment and mitigation. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:6-9.
    • (2012) Journal of Applied Ecology , vol.49 , pp. 6-9
    • Hill, D.1    Arnold, R.2
  • 14
    • 84885460860 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A process for assessing the offsetability of biodiversity impacts
    • Pilgrim, J. D., et al. 2013. A process for assessing the offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conservation Letters 6(5):376-384.
    • (2013) Conservation Letters , vol.6 , Issue.5 , pp. 376-384
    • Pilgrim, J.D.1
  • 15
    • 83555163671 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions
    • Quetier, F., and S. Lavorel. 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation 144:2991-2999.
    • (2011) Biological Conservation , vol.144 , pp. 2991-2999
    • Quetier, F.1    Lavorel, S.2
  • 16
    • 84894292609 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? A critical review of the French no net loss policy
    • Quetier, F., B. Regnery, and H. Levrel. 2014. No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? A critical review of the French no net loss policy. Environmental Science & Policy 38:120-131.
    • (2014) Environmental Science & Policy , vol.38 , pp. 120-131
    • Quetier, F.1    Regnery, B.2    Levrel, H.3
  • 18
    • 84904747019 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Offsetting the impacts of mining to achieve no net loss of native vegetation
    • Sonter, L. J., D. J. Barrett, and B. S. Soares-Filho. 2014. Offsetting the impacts of mining to achieve no net loss of native vegetation. Conservation Biology 28:1068-1076.
    • (2014) Conservation Biology , vol.28 , pp. 1068-1076
    • Sonter, L.J.1    Barrett, D.J.2    Soares-Filho, B.S.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.