Slacks-based inefficiency approach for general networks with bad outputs: An application to the banking sector

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 60, Issue , 2016, Pages 73-84

  Lozano, Sebastián ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bank branches; Banks; Efficiency; Network DEA; Slacks based inefficiency; Undesirable outputs

Indexed keywords

NETWORK TOPOLOGY;

BANK BRANCHES; BANKING SECTORS; EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT; ENERGY GENERATIONS; GENERAL NETWORKS; NETWORK DEA; NETWORKS OF PROCESS; SIMPLEST LINEAR; SLACKS-BASED INEFFICIENCY; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUT;

LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84958616528     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ahn H., Le M.H. An insight into the specification of the input-output set for DEA-based bank efficiency measurement. Management Review Quarterly 2014, 64:3-37.
2. Akther S., Fukuyama H., Weber W.L. Estimating two-stage network slacks-based inefficiency: an application to Bangladesh banking. Omega 2013, 41:88-96.
3. Ashrafi A., Jaafar A.B. Performance measurement of two-stage production systems with undesirable factors by data envelopment analysis. Journal of Applied Sciences 2011, 11(20):3515-3519.
4. Avkiran N.K. Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: an illustration with UAE banks. Omega 2009, 37:930-941.
5. Avkiran N.K., McCrystal A. Sensitivity analysis of network DEA: NSBM versus NRAM. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2012, 218:11226-11239.
6. Avkiran, NK. An illustration of dynamic network DEA in commercial banking including robustness tests, Omega, in press, . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.07.002.
7. Bi, GB. Tao, C. Evaluating productive and ecological efficiencies of plants. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on management science and engineering, Moscow; 2009. p. 338-43.
8. Chen Y., Cook W.D., Li N., Zhu J. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196:1170-1176.
9. Chen Y., Cook W.D., Zhu J. "Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 202(1):138-142.
10. Chen C., Yan H. Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 213:147-155.
11. Cook W.D., Hababou M., Tuenter H.J.H. Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2000, 14:209-224.
12. Cook W.D., Liang L., Zhu J. Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega 2010, 38(6):423-430.
13. Ebrahimnejad A., Tavana M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Shahverdi R., Yousefpour M. A three-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to banking industry. Measurement 2014, 49:308-319.
14. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2000, 34:35-49.
15. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003, 85:1070-1074.
16. Fukuyama H., Weber W.L. A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega 2010, 38(5):239-410.
17. Fukuyama H., Weber W.L. A dynamic network DEA model with an application to Japanese Cooperative Shinkin Banks. Efficiency and productivity growth in the financial services industry 2013, Wiley, London, Chapter 9, p. 193-13. F. Pasiouras (Ed.).
18. Fukuyama H., Matousek R. Efficiency of Turkish banking: two-stage network system. Variable returns to scale model. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 2011, 21:75-91.
19. González E., Cárcaba A., Ventura J. How car dealers adjust prices to reach the product efficiency frontier in the Spanish automobile market. Omega 2015, 51:38-48.
20. Hailu A., Veeman T.S. Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83:605-616.
21. Hsieh L.F., Lin L.H. A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan-an application of the relational network DEA. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2010, 29:14-24.
22. Hosseinzadeh Lofti F., Hasanpour P. Evaluation of performance in network using dea with undesirable and non-discretionary data. Applied Mathematical Sciences 2010, 4(34):1691-1702.
23. Hua Z., Bian Y. Performance measurement for network DEA with undesirable factors. International Journal of Management and Decision Making 2008, 9(2):141-153.
24. Huang J., Chen J., Yin Z. A network DEA model with super efficiency and undesirable outputs: an application to bank efficiency in China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2014, 10.1155/2014/793192.
25. Jalali Naini S.G., Moini A., Rezaee M.J. Nash bargaining game model for two parallel stages process evaluation with shared inputs. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2013, 67:475-484.
26. Kao C. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 192:949-962.
27. Kao C., Hwang S.N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 185:418-429.
28. Kao C., Liu S.T. Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: the case of Taiwanese commercial banks. Omega 2014, 47:90-98.
29. Kao C. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis with slacks-based measures. Omega 2014, 45:1-6.
30. Kordrostami S., Amirteimoori A. Un-desirable factors in multi-component performance measurement. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005, 172:721-729.
31. Kuosmanen T. Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 87:1077-1082.
32. LaPlante A.E., Paradi J.C. Evaluation of bank branch growth potential using data envelopment analysis. Omega 2015, 52:33-41.
33. Lewis H.F., Lock K.A., Sexton T.R. Organizational capability, efficiency, and effectiveness in Major League Baseball: 1901-2002. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 197:731-740.
34. Li Y., Chen Y., Liang L., Xie J. DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega 2012, 40(5):611-618.
35. Liang L., Cook W.D., Zhu J DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics 2008, 55:643-653.
36. Lin T.Y., Chiu S.H. Using independent component analysis and network DEA to improve bank performance evaluation. Economic Modelling 2013, 32:608-616.
37. Liu W., Zhou Z., Liu D., Xiao H. Estimation of portfolio efficiency via DEA. Omega 2015, 52:107-118.
38. Lozano S. Scale and cost efficiency analysis of networks of processes. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 38(6):6612-6617.
39. Lozano S., Gutiérrez E., Moreno P. Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2013, 37:1665-1676.
40. Ma C., Liu D., Zhou Z., Zhao W., Liu W. Game cross efficiency for systems with two-stage structures. Journal of Applied Mathematics 2014, 10.1155/2014/747596.
41. Maghbouli M., Amirteimoori A., Kordrostami S. Two-stage networks structures with undesirable outputs: a DEA based approach. Measurement 2014, 48:109-118.
42. Matthews K. Risk management and managerial efficiency in Chinese banks: a network DEA framework. Omega 2013, 41:207-215.
43. Mirhedayatian S.M., Azadi M., Farzipoor Saen R. A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics 2014, 147:544-554.
44. Moreno P., Lozano S. A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA. Annals of Operations Research 2014, 214(1):99-124.
45. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks. Management Science 1999, 45(9):1270-1288.
46. Song M., Wang S., Liu W. A two-stage DEA approach for environmental efficiency measurement. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2014, 186(5):3041-3051.
47. Tavana M., Mirzagoltabar H., Mirhedayatian S.M., Farzipoor Saen R., Azadi M. A new network epsilon-based DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2013, 66:501-513.
48. Tone K., Tsutsui M. Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 197:243-252.
49. Tone K., Tsutsui M. Dynamic DEA with network structure: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 2014, 42:124-131.
50. Tsolas I.E. Modeling bank branch profitability and effectiveness by means of DEA. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 2010, 59(5):432-451.
51. Paradi J.C., Rouatt S., Zhu H. Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Omega 2011, 39(1):99-109.
52. Wang K., Huang W., Wu J., Liu Y.N. Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA. Omega 2014, 44:5-20.
53. Wanke P., Barros C. Two-stage DEA: an application to major Brazilian banks. Expert Systems with Applications 2014, 41:2337-2344.
54. Yang C., Liu H.M. Managerial efficiency in Taiwan bank branches: a network DEA. Economic Modelling 2012, 29:450-461.
55. Yu M.M. Assessment of airport performance using the SBM-NDEA model. Omega 2010, 38:440-452.
56. Zha Y., Liang L. Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 205:332-338.