Game cross efficiency for systems with two-stage structures

Journal of Applied Mathematics

Volumn 2014, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Ma, Chaoqun ^a   Liu, Debin ^a   Zhou, Zhongbao ^a   Zhao, Wei ^a   Liu, Wenbin ^a,b  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896984999     PISSN: 1110757X     EISSN: 16870042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2014/747596     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978 2 6 429 444 MR0525905 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 ZBL0416.90080 (Pubitemid 9402758)
2. Nakabayashi K., Tone K., Egoist's dilemma: a DEA game. Omega 2006 34 2 135 148 2-s2.0-27744488908 10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.003 (Pubitemid 41600570)
3. Zhou Z., Zhao L., Lui S., Ma C., A generalized fuzzy DEA/AR performance assessment model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2012 55 11-12 2117 2128 10.1016/j.mcm.2012.01.017
4. Zhou Z., Lui S., Ma C., Liu D., Liu W., Fuzzy data envelopment analysis models with assurance regions: a note. Expert Systems with Applications 2012 39 2 2227 2231 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.070
5. Zhou Z., Yang W., Ma C., Liu W., A comment on, "A comment on 'A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems'" and 'A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems'. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2010 59 4 1019 1021 10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.027
6. Lozano S., DEA production games. European Journal of Operational Research 2013 231 2 405 413 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.004 MR3085204
7. Zhou Z., Wang M., Ding H., Ma C., Liu W., Further study of production possibility set and performance evaluation model in supply chain DEA. Annals of Operations Research 2013 206 1 585 592 10.1007/s10479-013-1365-9 MR3073862 ZBL1272.91075
8. Cook W. D., Liang L., Zhu J., Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega 2010 38 6 423 430 2-s2.0-77952541854 10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.001
9. Seiford L. M., Zhu J., Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science 1999 45 9 1270 1288 2-s2.0-0033365646 (Pubitemid 30498710)
10. Kao C., Hwang S.-N., Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research 2008 185 1 418 429 2-s2.0-34548702436 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041 (Pubitemid 47418455)
11. Chen Y., Cook W. D., Li N., Zhu J., Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 2009 196 3 1170 1176 2-s2.0-58849138733 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.011
12. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach. Economics Letters 1996 50 1 65 70 2-s2.0-0030305874 10.1016/0165-1765(95)00729-6
13. Liang L., Cook W. D., Zhu J., DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics 2008 55 7 643 653 10.1002/nav.20308 MR2450593 ZBL1160.90528
14. Du J., Liang L., Chen Y., Cook W. D., Zhu J., A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research 2011 210 2 390 397 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.025 MR2746901 ZBL1210.90037
15. Kao C., Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model. European Journal of Operational Research 2009 192 3 949 962 2-s2.0-51649114774 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.008
16. Zhou Z., Sun L., Yang W., Liu W., Ma C., A bargaining game model for efficiency decomposition in the centralized model of two-stage systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2013 64 1 103 108
17. Gregoriou G. N., Rouah F., Satchell S., Diz F., Simple and cross efficiency of CTAs using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Finance 2005 11 5 393 409 2-s2.0-27744537053 10.1080/1351847042000286667 (Pubitemid 41617264)
18. Wu J., Sun J., Liang L., Zha Y., Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Systems with Applications 2011 38 5 5162 5165 2-s2.0-79151471349 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.046
19. Falagario M., Sciancalepore F., Costantino N., Pietroforte R., Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders. European Journal of Operational Research 2012 218 2 523 529 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.031 MR2874471 ZBL1244.90156
20. Sexton T. R., Silkman R. H., Hogan A. J., Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation 1986 1986 32 73 105
21. Doyle J., Green R., Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1994 45 5 567 578 2-s2.0-0028433740
22. Liang L., Wu J., Cook W. D., Zhu J., The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research 2008 56 5 1278 1288 10.1287/opre.1070.0487 MR2468913 ZBL1167.91330
23. Wu J., Liang L., Zha Y.-C., Determination of the weights of ultimate cross efficiency based on the solution of nucleolus. System Engineering Theory and Practice 2008 28 5 92 97 2-s2.0-45449120272 (Pubitemid 351849646)
24. Örkcü H. H., Bal H., Goal programming approaches for data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2011 218 2 346 356 10.1016/j.amc.2011.05.070 MR2820496 ZBL1226.90095
25. Wu J., Sun J., Liang L., Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2012 63 2 513 519
26. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 1962 9 181 186 MR0152370 10.1002/nav.3800090303 ZBL0127.36901