Motion along the mental number line reveals shared representations for numerosity and space

eLife

Volumn 5, Issue JANUARY2016, 2016, Pages

  Schwiedrzik, Caspar M ^a   Bernstein, Benjamin ^b   Melloni, Lucia ^c,d,e  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH   (Germany)

^d College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; PARIETAL CORTEX; PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; MOTION; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84958559274     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/elife.10806     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Afraz S-R, Kiani R, Vaziri-Pashkam M, Esteky H. 2004. Motion-induced overestimation of the number of items in a display. Perception 33: 915-925. doi: 10. 1068/p5296.
2. Anderson ML. 2010. Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: 245-266. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X10000853.
3. Arrighi R, Togoli I, Burr DC. 2014. A generalized sense of number. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281: 20141791. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2014. 1791.
4. Ben Hamed S, Duhamel J-R, Bremmer F, Graf W. 2001. Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: a quantitative receptive field analysis. Experimental Brain Research 140: 127-144. doi: 10. 1007/s002210100785.
5. Benavoli A, Corani G, Mangili F, Zaffalon M, Ruggeri F. 2014. A Bayesian Wilcoxon signed-rank test based on the Dirichlet process. In: Jebara T, Xing E. P eds Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14). Beijing, CN. p. 1026-1034.
6. Born RT, Bradley DC. 2005. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annual Review of Neuroscience 28: 157-189. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. neuro. 26. 041002. 131052.
7. Burr D, Ross J. 2008. A visual sense of number. Current Biology 18: 425-428. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2008. 02. 052.
8. Colby CL, Duhamel JR, Goldberg ME. 1993. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. Journal of Neurophysiology 69: 902-914.
9. Cousineau D. 2005. Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 1: 42-45.
10. de Hevia MD, Spelke ES. 2010. Number-space mapping in human infants. Psychological Science 21: 653-660. doi: 10. 1177/0956797610366091.
11. Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P. 1993. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122: 371-396. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 122. 3. 371.
12. Dehaene S, Changeux JP. 1993. Development of elementary numerical abilities: a neuronal model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 390-407. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 1993. 5. 4. 390.
13. Dehaene S, Cohen L. 2007. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56: 384-398. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2007. 10. 004.
14. Drucker CB, Brannon EM. 2014. Rhesus monkeys (macaca mulatta) map number onto space. Cognition 132: 57-67. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2014. 03. 011.
15. Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, Ben Hamed S, Graf W. 1997. Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons. Nature 389: 845-848. doi: 10. 1038/39865.
16. Durgin FH. 2008. Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited. Current Biology 18: R855-R856. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2008. 07. 053.
17. Fanini A, Assad JA. 2009. Direction selectivity of neurons in the macaque lateral intraparietal area. Journal of Neurophysiology 101: 289-305. doi: 10. 1152/jn. 00400. 2007.
18. Fogassi L, Luppino G. 2005. Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15: 626-631. doi: 10. 1016/j. conb. 2005. 10. 015.
19. Halberda J, Mazzocco MM, Feigenson L. 2008. Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature 455: 665-668. doi: 10. 1038/nature07246.
20. Hedges L, Olkin I. 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21. Higgins JJ, Tashtoush S. 1994. An aligned rank transform test for interaction. Nonlinear World 1: 201-211.
22. Hiris E, Blake R. 1992. Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 9025-9028. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 89. 19. 9025.
23. Hubbard EM, Piazza M, Pinel P, Dehaene S. 2005. Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 435-448. doi: 10. 1038/nrn1684.
24. Keus IM, Schwarz W. 2005. Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: evidence for a response-related origin. Memory & Cognition 33: 681-695. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195335.
25. Knapen T, Rolfs M, Cavanagh P. 2009. The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic. Journal of Vision 9: 16-17. doi: 10. 1167/9. 5. 16.
26. Levinson E, Sekuler R. 1976. Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vision Research 16: 779-IN7. doi: 10. 1016/0042-6989(76)90189-9.
27. Liu W, Zhang ZJ, Zhao YJ, Liu ZF, Li BC. 2013. Effects of awareness on numerosity adaptation. PloS One 8: e77556. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0077556.
28. Mather G, Harris J. 1998. Theoretical models of the motion aftereffect. In: Mather G, Verstraten F, Anstis S eds The Motion Aftereffect a Modern Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 157-185.
29. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Bradshaw JA. 1994. Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 57: 1228-1235. doi: 10. 1136/jnnp. 57. 10. 1228.
30. Mollon J. 1974. After-effects and the brain. New Scientist 61: 479-482.
31. Morey RD. 2008. Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 4: 61-64.
32. Moyer RS, Landauer TK. 1967. Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 215: 1519-1520. doi: 10. 1038/2151519a0.
33. Mullette-Gillman OA, Cohen YE, Groh JM. 2005. Eye-centered, head-centered, and complex coding of visual and auditory targets in the intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neurophysiology 94: 2331-2352. doi: 10. 1152/jn. 00021. 2005.
34. Nieder A, Dehaene S. 2009. Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32: 185-208. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. neuro. 051508. 135550.
35. Nieder A, Diester I, Tudusciuc O. 2006. Temporal and spatial enumeration processes in the primate parietal cortex. Science 313: 1431-1435. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1130308.
36. Prins N, Kingdom FA. 2009. Palamedes: Matlab routines for analyzing psychophysical data. Available from: http://www. palamedestoolbox. org.
37. Robbins R, McKone E, Edwards M. 2007. Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 33: 570-592. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 33. 3. 570.
38. Roitman JD, Brannon EM, Platt ML. 2007. Monotonic coding of numerosity in macaque lateral intraparietal area. PLoS Biology 5: e208. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pbio. 0050208.
39. Rugani R, Vallortigara G, Priftis K, Regolin L. 2015. Animal cognition. number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line. Science 347: 534-536. doi: 10. 1126/science. aaa1379.
40. Salillas E, Basso D, Baldi M, Semenza C, Vecchi T. 2009. Motion on numbers: transcranial magnetic stimulation on the ventral intraparietal sulcus alters both numerical and motion processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21: 2129-2138. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2008. 21157.
41. Schwiedrzik CM, Bernstein B, Melloni L. 2015. Motion along the mental number line reveals shared representations for numerosity and space. Figshare. Available from: https://figshare. com/articles/Motion_along_the_mental_number_line_reveals_shared_representations_for_numerosity_and_space/1517750. doi: 10. 6084/m9. figshare. 1517750.
42. Shaki S, Fischer MH. 2008. Reading space into numbers: a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition 108: 590-599. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2008. 04. 001.
43. Shi J, Weng X, He S, Jiang Y. 2010. Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting. Cognition 117: 348-354. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2010. 09. 001.
44. Sigmundsson H, Anholt SK, Talcott JB. 2010. Are poor mathematics skills associated with visual deficits in temporal processing? Neuroscience Letters 469: 248-250. doi: 10. 1016/j. neulet. 2009. 12. 005.
45. Solomon SG, Kohn A. 2014. Moving sensory adaptation beyond suppressive effects in single neurons. Current Biology 24: R1012-1022. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2014. 09. 001.
46. Turi M, Burr D. 2012. Spatiotopic perceptual maps in humans: evidence from motion adaptation. Proceedings Biological Sciences 279: 3091-3097. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2012. 0637.
47. Verguts T, Fias W. 2004. Representation of number in animals and humans: a neural model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1493-1504. doi: 10. 1162/0898929042568497.
48. Walsh V. 2003. A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 483-488. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2003. 09. 002.
49. Webster MA. 2011. Adaptation and visual coding. Journal of Vision 11: 3. doi: 10. 1167/11. 5. 3.
50. Whitney D, Cavanagh P. 2003. Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect. Perception & Psychophysics 65: 1011-1018. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194830.
51. Wilcox RR. 2010. Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods. 2nd Edn New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4419-5525-8.
52. Wobbrock JO, Findlater L, Gergle D, Higgins JJ. 2011. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. Proceedings of the ACM Conference Conference on Human Factorsin Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC). 143-146.
53. Zorzi M, Priftis K, Umiltà C. 2002. Brain damage: neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 417: 138-139. doi: 10. 1038/417138a.