A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretational pitfalls

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue JAN2016, 2016, Pages

  Bastos, André M ^a   Schoffelen, Jan Mathijs ^b,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coherence analysis; Electrophysiology; Functional connectivity (FC); Granger causality; Oscillations; Phase synchronization

Indexed keywords

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTUITION; SAMPLE SIZE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84958553440     PISSN: 16625137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Ahrens, M. B., Orger, M. B., Robson, D. N., Li, J. M., and Keller, P. J. (2013). Whole- brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 10, 413-420. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2434.
2. Alonso, J. M., Usrey, W. M., and Reid, R. C. (1996). Precisely correlated firing in cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 383, 815-819. doi: 10.1038/383815a0.
3. Aru, J., Aru, J., Priesemann, V., Wibral, M., Lana, L., Pipa, G., et al. (2015). Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 31, 51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.002.
4. Baccalá, L. A., and Sameshima, K. (2001). Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol. Cybern. 84, 463-474. doi: 10.1007/PL00007990.
5. Barnett, L., and Seth, A. K. (2011). Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: theoretical invariance and practical application. J. Neurosci. Methods 201, 404-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010.
6. Barnett, L., and Seth, A. K. (2014). The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference. J. Neurosci. Methods 223, 50-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.018.
7. Bastos, A. M., Litvak, V., Moran, R., Bosman, C. A., Fries, P., and Friston, K. J. (2015a). A DCM study of spectral asymmetries in feedforward and feedback connections between visual areas V1 and V4 in the monkey. Neuroimage 108, 460-475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.081.
8. Bastos, A. M., Vezoli, J., Bosman, C. A., Schoffelen, J.-M., Oostenveld, R., Dowdall, J. R., et al. (2015b). Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels. Neuron 85, 390-401. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.018.
9. Bastos, A. M., Vezoli, J., and Fries, P. (2014). Communication through coherence with inter-areal delays. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 31C, 173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.11.001.
10. Berényi, A., Somogyvári, Z., Nagy, A. J., Roux, L., Long, J. D., Fujisawa, S., et al. (2014). Large-scale, high-density (up to 512 channels) recording of local circuits in behaving animals. J. Neurophysiol. 111, 1132-1149. doi: 10.1152/jn.00785.2013.
11. Blinowska, K. J. (2011). Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 49, 521-529. doi: 10.1007/s11517-011-0739-x.
12. Bokil, H., Purpura, K., Schoffelen, J.-M., Thomson, D., and Mitra, P. (2007). Comparing spectra and coherences for groups of unequal size. J. Neurosci. Methods 159, 337-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.07.011.
13. Bollimunta, A., Chen, Y., Schroeder, C. E., and Ding, M. (2009). "Characterizing Oscillatory Cortical Networks with Granger Causality," in Coherent Behavior in Neuronal Networks, eds K. Josic, J. Rubin, M. Matias, and R. Romo (New York, NY: Springer New York), 169-189. Available online at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-0389-1_9 [Accessed November 10, 2015].
14. Bosman, C. A., Schoffelen, J.-M., Brunet, N., Oostenveld, R., Bastos, A. M., Womelsdorf, T., et al. (2012). Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas. Neuron 75, 875-888. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.037.
15. Bressler, S. L., and Seth, A. K. (2011). Wiener-Granger causality: a well established methodology. Neuroimage 58, 323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.059.
16. Brovelli, A. (2012). Statistical analysis of single-trial granger causality spectra. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2012, 1-10. doi: 10.1155/2012/697610.
17. Buzsáki, G., and Wang, X.-J. (2012). Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 203-225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444.
18. Canolty, R. T., and Knight, R. T. (2010). The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 506-515. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.001.
19. Chang, E. F. (2015). Towards large-scale, human-based, mesoscopic neurotechnologies. Neuron 86, 68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.037.
20. Delorme, A., Mullen, T., Kothe, C., Akalin Acar, Z., Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Vankov, A., et al. (2011). EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: new tools for advanced EEG processing. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011:130714. doi: 10.1155/2011/130714.
21. Dhamala, M., Rangarajan, G., and Ding, M. (2008). Estimating granger causality from Fourier and Wavelet transforms of time series data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:018701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.018701.
22. Ding, M., Chen, Y., and Bressler, S. L. (2006). "Granger causality: basic theory and application to neuroscience," in Handbook of Time Series Analysis: Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications, eds B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder, and T. Timmer (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA), 437-460.
23. Elsegai, H., Shiells, H., Thiel, M., and Schelter, B. (2015). Network inference in the presence of latent confounders: the role of instantaneous causalities. J. Neurosci. Methods 245, 91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.015.
24. Foster, B. L., Rangarajan, V., Shirer, W. R., and Parvizi, J. (2015). Intrinsic and task-dependent coupling of neuronal population activity in human parietal cortex. Neuron 86, 578-590. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.018.
25. Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., and Desimone, R. (2001). Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science 291, 1560-1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1055465.
26. Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011.
27. Fries, P. (2015). Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence. Neuron 88, 220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034.
28. Friston, K. J., Bastos, A., Litvak, V., Stephan, K. E., Fries, P., and Moran, R. J. (2012). DCM for complex-valued data: cross-spectra, coherence and phase-delays. Neuroimage 59, 439-455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.048.
29. Friston, K. J., Bastos, A. M., Oswal, A., van Wijk, B., Richter, C., and Litvak, V. (2014). Granger causality revisited. Neuroimage 101, 796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.062.
30. García Domínguez, L., Stieben, J., Pérez Velázquez, J. L., and Shanker, S. (2013). The imaginary part of coherency in autism: differences in cortical functional connectivity in preschool children. PLoS ONE 8:e75941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075941.
31. Geweke, J. (1982). Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77, 304-313. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477803.
32. Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econ. J. Econ. Soc. 37, 424-438. doi: 10.2307/1912791.
33. Gregoriou, G. G., Gotts, S. J., Zhou, H., and Desimone, R. (2009). High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science 324, 1207-1210. doi: 10.1126/science.1171402.
34. Guo, S., Seth, A. K., Kendrick, K. M., Zhou, C., and Feng, J. (2008). Partial Granger causality-eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables. J. Neurosci. Methods 172, 79-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.011.
35. Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., and Nolte, G. (2012). "Alleviating the influence of weak data asymmetries on granger-causal analyses," in Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, eds F. Theis, A. Cichocki, A. Yeredor, and M. Zibulevsky (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer), 25-33.
36. Hipp, J. F., Hawellek, D. J., Corbetta, M., Siegel, M., and Engel, A. K. (2012). Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 884-890. doi: 10.1038/nn.3101.
37. Hohlefeld, F. U., Huchzermeyer, C., Huebl, J., Schneider, G.-H., Nolte, G., Brücke, C., et al. (2013). Functional and effective connectivity in subthalamic local field potential recordings of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 250, 320-332. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.028.
38. Kajikawa, Y., and Schroeder, C. E. (2011). How local is the local field potential? Neuron 72, 847-858. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.029.
39. Kaminski, M., and Liang, H. (2005). Causal influence: advances in neurosignal analysis. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 33, 347-430. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v33.i4.20.
40. Kamiñski, M. J., and Blinowska, K. J. (1991). A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol. Cybern. 65, 203-210. doi: 10.1007/BF00198091.
41. Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J. N., Thesen, T., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., Malliaras, G. G., et al. (2015). NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 310-315. doi: 10.1038/nn.3905.
42. Kraskov, A., Stögbauer, H., and Grassberger, P. (2004). Estimating mutual information. Phys. Rev. E 69:066138. doi: 10.1103/physreve.69.066138.
43. Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., and Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 194-208.
44. Lewis, C. M., Bosman, C. A., and Fries, P. (2015). Recording of brain activity across spatial scales. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 32, 68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.12.007.
45. Lindner, M., Vicente, R., Priesemann, V., and Wibral, M. (2011). TRENTOOL: a Matlab open source toolbox to analyse information flow in time series data with transfer entropy. BMC Neurosci. 12:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-119.
46. Lisman, J. (1997). Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable. Trends Neurosci. 20, 38-43. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10070-9.
47. Lobier, M., Siebenhühner, F., Palva, S., and Palva, J. M. (2014). Phase transfer entropy: a novel phase-based measure for directed connectivity in networks coupled by oscillatory interactions. Neuroimage 85(Pt 2), 853-872. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.056.
48. Maris, E., Schoffelen, J.-M., and Fries, P. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of coherence differences. J. Neurosci. Methods 163, 161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.02.011.
49. Mitra, P., and Bokil, H. (2008). Observed Brain Dynamics. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50. Nalatore, H., Ding, M., and Rangarajan, G. (2007). Mitigating the effects of measurement noise on Granger causality. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 75:031123. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.031123.
51. Niso, G., Bruña, R., Pereda, E., Gutiérrez, R., Bajo, R., Maestú, F., et al. (2013). HERMES: towards an integrated toolbox to characterize functional and effective brain connectivity. Neuroinformatics 11, 405-434. doi: 10.1007/s12021-013-9186-1.
52. Nolte, G., Bai, O., Wheaton, L., Mari, Z., Vorbach, S., and Hallett, M. (2004). Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin. Neurophysiol. Off. J. Int. Fed. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 2292-2307. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029.
53. Nolte, G., Ziehe, A., Nikulin, V. V., Schlögl, A., Krämer, N., Brismar, T., et al. (2008). Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:234101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.234101.
54. Nunez, P. L., Silberstein, R. B., Shi, Z., Carpenter, M. R., Srinivasan, R., Tucker, D. M., et al. (1999). EEG coherency II: experimental comparisons of multiple measures. Clin. Neurophysiol. Off. J. Int. Fed. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 469-486. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00043-1.
55. Nunez, P. L., Srinivasan, R., Westdorp, A. F., Wijesinghe, R. S., Tucker, D. M., Silberstein, R. B., et al. (1997). EEG coherency. I: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 103, 499-515. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00066-7.
56. Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., and Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011:156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869.
57. Ray, S. (2015). Challenges in the quantification and interpretation of spike-LFP relationships. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 31, 111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.004.
58. Richter, C. G., Thompson, W. H., Bosman, C. A., and Fries, P. (2015). A jackknife approach to quantifying single-trial correlation between covariance-based metrics undefined on a single-trial basis. Neuroimage 114, 57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.040.
59. Rosenberg, J. R., Halliday, D. M., Breeze, P., and Conway, B. A. (1998). Identification of patterns of neuronal connectivity-partial spectra, partial coherence, and neuronal interactions. J. Neurosci. Methods 83, 57-72. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00061-2.
60. Rubehn, B., Bosman, C., Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., and Stieglitz, T. (2009). A MEMS-based flexible multichannel ECoG-electrode array. J. Neural Eng. 6:036003. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/036003.
61. Saalmann, Y. B., Pinsk, M. A., Wang, L., Li, X., and Kastner, S. (2012). The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands. Science 337, 753-756. doi: 10.1126/science.1223082.
62. Sakkalis, V. (2011). Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG. Comput. Biol. Med. 41, 1110-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.020.
63. Salazar, R. F., Dotson, N. M., Bressler, S. L., and Gray, C. M. (2012). Content- specific fronto-parietal synchronization during visual working memory. Science 338, 1097-1100. doi: 10.1126/science.1224000.
64. Schoffelen, J.-M., and Gross, J. (2009). Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1857-1865. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20745.
65. Schreiber, T. (2000). Measuring information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 461-464. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.461.
66. Schwarz, D. A., Lebedev, M. A., Hanson, T. L., Dimitrov, D. F., Lehew, G., Meloy, J., et al. (2014). Chronic, wireless recordings of large-scale brain activity in freely moving rhesus monkeys. Nat. Methods 11, 670-676. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2936.
67. Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., and Barnett, L. (2015). Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 35, 3293-3297. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4399-14.2015.
68. Sherman, S. M., and Guillery, R. W. (2011). Distinct functions for direct and transthalamic corticocortical connections. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1068-1077. doi: 10.1152/jn.00429.2011.
69. Siegel, M., Donner, T. H., and Engel, A. K. (2012). Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 121-134. doi: 10.1038/nrn3137.
70. Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 24, 49-65, 111-125. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80821-1.
71. Sommerlade, L., Thiel, M., Mader, M., Mader, W., Timmer, J., Platt, B., et al. (2015). Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals: an approach to noisy data. J. Neurosci. Methods 239, 47-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.007.
72. Sporns, O. (2011). Networks of the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Srinivasan, R., Winter, W. R., Ding, J., and Nunez, P. L. (2007). EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics. J. Neurosci. Methods 166, 41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.026.
74. Stam, C. J., Nolte, G., and Daffertshofer, A. (2007). Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 1178-1193. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20346.
75. Usrey, W. M., Reppas, J. B., and Reid, R. C. (1998). Paired-spike interactions and synaptic efficacy of retinal inputs to the thalamus. Nature 395, 384-387. doi: 10.1038/26487.
76. Varela, F., Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., and Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 229-239. doi: 10.1038/35067550.
77. Vicente, R., Gollo, L. L., Mirasso, C. R., Fischer, I., and Pipa, G. (2008). Dynamical relaying can yield zero time lag neuronal synchrony despite long conduction delays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 17157-17162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809353105.
78. Vidal, J. R., Freyermuth, S., Jerbi, K., Hamamé, C. M., Ossandon, T., Bertrand, O., et al. (2012). Long-distance amplitude correlations in the high γ band reveal segregation and integration within the reading network. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 32, 6421-6434. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4363-11.2012.
79. Vinck, M., Battaglia, F. P., Womelsdorf, T., and Pennartz, C. (2012). Improved measures of phase-coupling between spikes and the Local Field Potential. J. Comput. Neurosci. 33, 53-75. doi: 10.1007/s10827-011-0374-4.
80. Vinck, M., Huurdeman, L., Bosman, C. A., Fries, P., Battaglia, F. P., Pennartz, C. M. A., et al. (2015). How to detect the Granger-causal flow direction in the presence of additive noise? Neuroimage 108, 301-318. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.017.
81. Vinck, M., Oostenveld, R., van Wingerden, M., Battaglia, F., and Pennartz, C. M. A. (2011). An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage 55, 1548-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055.
82. Vinck, M., van Wingerden, M., Womelsdorf, T., Fries, P., and Pennartz, C. M. A. (2010). The pairwise phase consistency: a bias-free measure of rhythmic neuronal synchronization. Neuroimage 51, 112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.073.
83. Wang, H. E., Bénar, C. G., Quilichini, P. P., Friston, K. J., Jirsa, V. K., and Bernard, C. (2014). A systematic framework for functional connectivity measures. Front. Neurosci. 8:405. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00405.
84. Wang, X.-J. (2010). Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiol. Rev. 90, 1195-1268. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2008.
85. Wen, X., Rangarajan, G., and Ding, M. (2013). Multivariate Granger causality: an estimation framework based on factorization of the spectral density matrix. Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 371, 20110610. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0610.
86. Wiener, N. (1956). "The theory of prediction," in Modern Mathematics for Engineers, ed E. Beckenbach (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill), 165-190.
87. Wilson, G. T. (1972). The factorization of matricial spectral densities. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 23, 420. doi: 10.1137/0123044.
88. Winter, W. R., Nunez, P. L., Ding, J., and Srinivasan, R. (2007). Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence. Stat. Med. 26, 3946-3957. doi: 10.1002/sim.2978.
89. Witham, C. L., Riddle, C. N., Baker, M. R., and Baker, S. N. (2011). Contributions of descending and ascending pathways to corticomuscular coherence in humans. J. Physiol. 589, 3789-3800. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.211045.
90. Womelsdorf, T., Schoffelen, J.-M., Oostenveld, R., Singer, W., Desimone, R., Engel, A. K., et al. (2007). Modulation of neuronal interactions through neuronal synchronization. Science 316, 1609-1612. doi: 10.1126/science.1139597.