Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1110-1117

  Sakkalis, V ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Alcoholism; Alzheimer's; Autism; Coherence; Effective connectivity; Functional connectivity; Generalized synchronization; Human brain connectivity; Information based techniques; Multivariate times series; Nonlinear synchronization; Partial directed coherence; Phase level value; Phase synchronization; Schizophrenia; Wavelet coherence

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; ALZHEIMER'S; AUTISM; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; GENERALIZED SYNCHRONIZATION; HUMAN BRAIN; INFORMATION BASED TECHNIQUES; NONLINEAR SYNCHRONIZATION; PARTIAL DIRECTED COHERENCE; PHASE LEVELS; PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; TIMES SERIES;

COHERENT LIGHT; DISEASES;

SYNCHRONIZATION;

ARTICLE; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; BRAIN FUNCTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTRONEUROLOGY; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

EID: 82955248152     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Friston K.J. Modalities, modes, and models in functional neuroimaging. Science 2009, 326(5951):399-403.
2. van Ooyen A. Competition in the development of nerve connections: a review of models. Network 2001, 12(1):R1-47.
3. Koch M.A., Norris D.G., Hund-Georgiadis M. An investigation of functional and anatomical connectivity using magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 2002, 16(1):241-250.
4. Fingelkurts A.A., Fingelkurts A.A., Kähkönen S. Functional connectivity in the brain-is it an elusive concept?. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2005, 28(8):827-836.
5. Horwitz B. The elusive concept of brain connectivity. NeuroImage 2003, 19(2 Pt 1):466-470.
6. Adey W.R., Walter D.O., Hendrix C.E. Computer techniques in correlation and spectral analyses of cerebral slow waves during discriminative behavior. Exp. Neurol. 1961, 3:501-524.
7. Scherg M., Von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 62(1):32-44.
8. Grech R., et al. Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2008, 5:25.
9. Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Computational and dynamic models in neuroimaging. NeuroImage 2010, 52(3):752-765.
10. Friston K.J., Harrison L., Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2003, 19(4):1273-1302.
11. Daunizeau J., Kiebel S., Friston K. Dynamic causal modelling of distributed electromagnetic responses. NeuroImage 2009, 47(2):590-601.
12. Kiebel S., et al. Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(6):1866-1876.
13. Lopes da Silva F., et al. Model of brain rhythmic activity. The alpha-rhythm of the thalamus. Kybernetik 1974, 15(1):27-37.
14. Moran R., et al. A neural mass model of spectral responses in electrophysiology. NeuroImage 2007, 37(3):706-720.
15. Jansen B., Rit V. Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biol. Cybern. 1995, 73(4):357-366.
16. Morris C., Lecar H. Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. Biophys. J. 1981, 35(1):193-213.
17. Delorme A., et al. From single-trial EEG to brain area dynamics. Neurocomputing 2002, 1057-1064.
18. Zervakis M., et al. Intertrial coherence and causal interaction among independent EEG components. J. Neurosc. Meth. 2011, 197(2):302-314.
19. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 424-438.
20. Geweke J. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1982, 304-313.
21. Geweke J.F. Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1984, 907-915.
22. Hosoya Y. Elimination of third-series effect and defining partial measures of causality. J. Time Ser. Anal. 2001, 537-554.
23. Kaminski M.J., Blinowska K.J. A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol. Cybern. 1991, 65(3):203-210.
24. Sameshima K., Baccala L.A. Using partial directed coherence to describe neuronal ensemble interactions. J. Neurosci. Meth. 1999, 94(1):93-103.
25. Baccala L.A., Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol. Cybern. 2001, 84(6):463-474.
26. Wehling S., et al. Assessment of connectivity patterns from multivariate time series by partial directed coherence. Chaos Complexity Lett. 2007, 413-433.
27. L. Baccala, K. Sameshima, D.Y. Takahashi, Generalized partial directed coherence, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, Cardiff, 2007, pp. 16-166.
28. Brazier M., Casby J. Cross-correlation and autocorrelation studies of electroencephalographic potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1952, 4(2):201-211.
29. Pfurtscheller G., Andrew C. Event-related changes of band power and coherence: methodology and interpretation. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 16(6):512-519.
30. Bendat J.S., Piersol A.G. Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis 1993, XIV. J. Wiley, New York, 458p. 2nd ed.
31. Ding M., et al. Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol. Cybern. 2000, 83(1):35-45.
32. Lachaux J., et al. Estimating the time-course of coherence between single-trial brain signals: an introduction to wavelet coherence. Neurophysiol. Clin. 2002, 32(3):157-174.
33. Sakkalis V., Zervakis M., Micheloyannis S. Significant EEG features involved in mathematical reasoning: evidence from wavelet analysis. Brain Topogr. 2006, 19(1-2):53-60.
34. Sakkalis V., et al. Time-significant wavelet coherence for the evaluation of schizophrenic brain activity using a graph theory approach. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2006, 1:4265-4268.
35. Lorenz E.N. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 1963, 130-148.
36. Pecora L., Carroll T. Synchronization in chaotic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64(8):821-824.
37. Pikovsky A. On the interaction of strange attractors. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter. 1984, 149-154.
38. Pikovsky A., Rosenblum M., Kurths J. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series) 2003, Cambridge University Press, 432.
39. Sakkalis V., et al. Assessment of linear and nonlinear synchronization measures for analyzing EEG in a mild epileptic paradigm. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2009, 13(4):433-441.
40. Lachaux J., et al. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 8(4):194-208.
41. Niedermeyer E., Lopes da Silva F.H. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields 1999, XI. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1258 p. 4th ed.
42. Pereda E., Quiroga R., Bhattacharya J. Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005, 77(1-2):1-37.
43. Mormann F., et al. Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients. Phys. D: Nonlin. Phenom. 2000, 358-369.
44. J. Arnhold, et al., A robust method for detecting interdependences: application to intracranially recorded EEG. Phys. D: Nonlin. Phenom. 134 (1999).
45. Quian Quiroga R., et al. Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2002, 65(4 Pt 1):041903.
46. Arnhold J., et al. A robust method for detecting interdependences: application to intracranially recorded EEG. Phys. D: Nonlin. Phenom. 1999, 134.
47. Takens F., Rand D.A., Young L.S. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dynamical systems and Turbulence, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1981, 366-381.
48. Sakkalis V., Zervakis M. Linear and Nonlinear Synchronization Analysis and Visualization during Altered States of Consciousness. Recent Advances in Biomedical Engineering 2010, IN-TECH, Vienna. G.R. Naik (Ed.).
49. Jeong J., Gore J.C., Peterson B.S. Mutual information analysis of the EEG in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112(5):827-835.
50. Na S.H., et al. EEG in schizophrenic patients: mutual information analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113(12):1954-1960.
51. Rissanen J., Wax M. Measures of Mutual and Causal Dependence Between Two Time Series. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1987, IEEE Press Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 598-601.
52. Moran R., et al. Dynamic causal models of steady-state responses. NeuroImage 2009, 44(3):796-811.
53. von Bünau P., et al. Finding stationary subspaces in multivariate time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103(21):214101.
54. Akaike H. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 1974, 716-723.
55. Theiler J., Rapp P. Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional, nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 98(3):213-222.
56. Marzetti L., Del Gratta C., Nolte G. Understanding brain connectivity from EEG data by identifying systems composed of interacting sources. NeuroImage 2008, 42(1):87-98.
57. Gómez-Herrero G., et al. Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources. NeuroImage 2008, 43(3):497-508.
58. Sakkalis V., et al. Assessment of neural dynamic coupling and causal interactions between independent EEG components from cognitive tasks using linear and nonlinear methods. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008, 2008:3767-3770.
59. Nolte G., et al. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115(10):2292-2307.
60. Sakkalis V., Tsiaras V., Tollis I. Graph analysis and visualization for brain function characterization using EEG data. J. Healthcare Eng. 2010, 1(3):435-459.
61. Christodoulou E.G., et al. BrainNetVis: an open-access tool to effectively quantify and visualize brain networks. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011:747290.
62. Sakkalis V. Applied strategies towards EEG/MEG biomarker identification in clinical and cognitive research. Biomark. Med. 2011, 5(1):93-105.
63. Cosandier-Rimélé D., et al. Computational modeling of epileptic activity: from cortical sources to EEG signals. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 27(6):465-470.
64. Osipova D., et al. Effects of scopolamine on MEG spectral power and coherence in elderly subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114(10):1902-1907.
65. Dauwels J., et al. A comparative study of synchrony measures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on EEG. NeuroImage 2010, 49(1):668-693.
66. Friston K.J. Schizophrenia and the disconnection hypothesis. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 1999, 395:68-79.
67. Spencer K.M., et al. Abnormal neural synchrony in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23(19):7407-7411.
68. Haig A.R., et al. Gamma activity in schizophrenia: evidence of impaired network binding?. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111(8):1461-1468.
69. Bassett D.S., et al. Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(28):11747-11752.
70. Just M.A., et al. Functional and anatomical cortical underconnectivity in autism: evidence from an FMRI study of an executive function task and corpus callosum morphometry. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17(4):951-961.
71. L. Pollonini, et al., Functional connectivity networks in the autistic and healthy brain assessed using Granger causality, in: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEMBS'10 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2010.
72. Kulisek R., et al. Nonlinear analysis of the sleep EEG in children with pervasive developmental disorder. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2008, 29(4):512-517.
73. Bosl W., et al. EEG complexity as a biomarker for autism spectrum disorder risk. BMC Med. 2011, 9:18.
74. Winterer G., et al. EEG phenotype in alcoholism: increased coherence in the depressive subtype. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2003, 108(1):51-60.
75. de Bruin E.A., et al. Moderate-to-heavy alcohol intake is associated with differences in synchronization of brain activity during rest and mental rehearsal. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2006, 60(3):304-314.
76. Sakkalis V., et al. Optimal brain network synchrony visualization: application in an alcoholism paradigm. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2007, 2007:4285-4288.