Corrigendum to Taste moral, taste good: The effects of Fairtrade logo and second language on product taste evaluation [Food Qual. Preference, 50, (2016), 152-156] DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.011;Taste moral, taste good: The effects of Fairtrade logo and second language on product taste evaluation

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 50, Issue , 2016, Pages 152-156

  Tang, Shi ^a   Arciniegas, Catalina ^b   Yu, Feng ^b,c   Han, Ji ^b   Chen, Shuquan ^b   Shi, Jinfang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Tsinghua University   (China)

Author keywords

Fairtrade logo; Moral consumption; Moral judgment; Second language

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958529717     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.04.002     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. Caldwell-Harris C.L., Ayçiçeği-Dinn A. Emotion and lying in a non-native language. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2009, 71(3):193-204.
2. Cardello A.V. Sensory evaluation and consumer food choice. Cereal Foods World 1995, 40(11):876-878.
3. Cardello A.V. Measuring consumer expectations to improve food product development. Consumer-led food product development 2007, 223-261. Woodhead publishing, Cambridge. H.J.H. Macfie (Ed.).
4. Cipolletti H., McFarlane S., Weissglass C. The moral foreign-language effect. Philosophical Psychology 2016.
5. Costa A., Foucart A., Hayakawa S., Aparici M., Apesteguia J., Heafner J., Keysar B. Your morals depend on language. PloS one 2014, 9(4):e94842.
6. Eskine K.J., Kacinik N.A., Prinz J.J. A bad taste in the mouth gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science 2011, 22(3):295-299.
7. Eyal T., Liberman N., Trope Y. Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44(4):1204-1209.
8. Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., Surian L. How foreign language shapes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2015, 59:8-17.
9. Langen N. Are ethical consumption and charitable giving substitutes or not? Insights into consumers' coffee choice. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(5):412-421.
10. Lee H.J., Yun Z.S. Consumers' perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 39:259-267.
11. Lotz S., Christandl F., Fetchenhauer D. What is fair is good: Evidence of consumers' taste for fairness. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30(2):139-144.
12. Mazar N., Zhong C.B. Do green products make us better people?. Psychological Science 2010, 21(4):494-498.
13. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:165-179.
14. Poelman A., Mojet J., Lyon D., Sefa-Dedeh S. The influence of information about organic production and fairtrade on preferences for and perception of pineapple. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(1):114-121.
15. Pohl R.F. Effects of labelling. Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment and memory 2004, 327-344. Psychology Press, Hove. R.F. Pohl (Ed.).
16. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, 36(4):717-731.
17. Rousseau S. The role of organic and fairtrade labels when choosing chocolate. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 44:92-100.
18. Shiv B., Carmon Z., Ariely D. Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research 2005, 42(4):383-393.
19. Sörqvist P., Haga A., Langeborg L., Holmgren M., Wallinder M., Nöstl A., et al. The green halo: Mechanisms and limits of the eco-label effect. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 43:1-9.
20. Zander K., Hamm U. Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(5):495-503.