The early-warning model of equipment chain in gas pipeline based on DNN-HMM

Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue , 2015, Pages 1710-1722

  Qiu, Jingwei ^a   Liang, Wei ^a   Zhang, Laibin ^a   Yu, Xuchao ^a   Zhang, Meng ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

Author keywords

Compressor unit; Deep belief networks; Early warning; Equipment chain; Hidden Markov model

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; COMPRESSORS; DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS; HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS; PIPELINES; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

AUXILIARY SYSTEMS; COMPRESSOR UNITS; DEEP BELIEF NETWORKS; EARLY WARNING; EARLY WARNING SYSTEM; EARLY-WARNING MODELS; PIPELINE LEAKAGE; PROCESSING SPEED;

AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT;

EID: 84958163210     PISSN: 18755100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.10.036     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Al Yahyai M., Mba D. Rotor dynamic response of a centrifugal compressor due to liquid carry over: a case study. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2014, 45:436-448.
2. Baum L.E., Petrie T. Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Ann. Math. Stat. 1966, 1554-1563.
3. Baruah P., Chinnam R.B. HMMs for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2005, 43(6):1275-1293.
4. Bengio Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2009, 2(1):1-127.
5. Bengio Y., Lamblin P., Popovici D., Larochelle H. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2007, vol. 19:153.
6. Chen H., Murray A.F. Continuous restricted Boltzmann machine with an implementable training algorithm. Vis. Image Signal Process. IEE Proc. IET 2003, 150(3):153-158.
7. Carnero M.C., Pedregal D.J. Forecasting turbine problems by means of the state space framework. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2011, 24(4):432-439.
8. Dahl G.E., Yu D., Deng L., Acero A. Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition. Audio Speech Lang. Process. IEEE Trans. 2012, 20(1):30-42.
9. Dokas I.M., Feehan J., Imran S. EWaSAP: an early warning sign identification approach based on a systemic hazard analysis. Saf. Sci. 2013, 58:11-26.
10. Farabet C., Couprie C., Najman L., LeCun Y. Learning hierarchical features for scene labeling. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. IEEE Trans. 2013, 35(8):1915-1929.
11. Fu L., Kara L.B. Neural network-based symbol recognition using a few labeled samples. Comput. Graph. 2011, 35(5):955-966.
12. Hinton G.E. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Comput. 2002, 14(8):1771-1800.
13. Hinton G.E., Osindero S., Teh Y.W. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 2006, 18(7):1527-1554.
14. Hinton G.E. A practical guide to training restricted boltzmann machines. Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade 2012, 599-619. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
15. Iglesias E.L., Vieira A.S., Borrajo L. An HMM-based over-sampling technique to improve text classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40(18):7184-7192.
16. Kang J., Zhang L., Liang W. Fault diagnosis of pipeline and pump unit systems using status coupling analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2015, 33:70-76.
17. Kuremoto T., Kimura S., Kobayashi K., et al. Time series forecasting using a deep belief network with restricted Boltzmann machines. Neurocomputing 2014, 137:47-56.
18. Lopes N., Ribeiro B. Towards adaptive learning with improved convergence of deep belief networks on graphics processing units. Pattern Recognit. 2014, 47(1):114-127.
19. Liang W., Lu L., Zhang L. Coupling relations and early-warning for "equipment chain" in long-distance pipeline. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2013, 41(1):335-347.
20. Liu Y., Zhou S., Chen Q. Discriminative deep belief networks for visual data classification. Pattern Recognit. 2011, 44(10):2287-2296.
21. Li Z., Wu Z., He Y., et al. Hidden Markov model-based fault diagnostics method in speed-up and speed-down process for rotating machinery. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2005, 19(2):329-339.
22. Mohamed A., Yu D., Deng L. Investigation of full-sequence training of deep belief networks for speech recognition. INTERSPEECH 2010, 2846-2849.
23. Ogaji S.O.T., Sampath S., Marinai L., et al. Evolution strategy for gas-turbine fault-diagnoses. Appl. Energy 2005, 81(2):222-230.
24. Shang C., Yang F., Huang D., Lyu W. Data-driven soft sensor development based on deep learning technique. J. Process Control 2014, 24(3):223-233.
25. Simani S., Patton R.J. Fault diagnosis of an industrial gas turbine prototype using a system identification approach. Control Eng. Pract. 2008, 16(7):769-786.
26. Samanta O., Bhattacharya U., Parui S.K. Smoothing of HMM parameters for efficient recognition of online handwriting. Pattern Recognit. 2014, 47(11):3614-3629.
27. Tamilselvan P., Wang P. Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013, 115:124-135.
28. Taieb S.B., Bontempi G., Atiya A.F., et al. A review and comparison of strategies for multi-step ahead time series forecasting based on the NN5 forecasting competition. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(8):7067-7083.
29. Tran V.T., Al Thobiani F., Ball A. An approach to fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valves using Teager-Kaiser energy operator and deep belief networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41(9):4113-4122.