Fault diagnosis of pipeline and pump unit systems using status coupling analysis

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 33, Issue , 2015, Pages 70-76

  Kang, Jian ^a   Zhang, Laibin ^a   Liang, Wei ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

Author keywords

Capture abnormal signal; False alarm rate; Fault detection; Pipelines and pump units; Status coupling analysis

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; ALGORITHMS; ERRORS; IMAGE RESOLUTION; PIPELINES; PUMPS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

ABNORMAL CONDITIONS; COUPLING ANALYSIS; COUPLING RELATIONSHIPS; DETECTION CAPABILITY; DETECTION SENSITIVITY; FALSE ALARM RATE; PUMP UNITS; STATUS IDENTIFICATIONS;

FAULT DETECTION;

EID: 84919884296     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anastasio P.L., Pan H., Liang Z.P., Anastasio T., Huang T. AHybrid NN-bayesian Architecture for Information Fusion 1998, Paper presented at the in Proceedings of ICIP98.
2. Cai B., Liu Y., Fan Q.F., Zhang Y., Liu Z., Yu S., Ji R. Multi-source information fusion based fault diagnosis of ground-source heat pump using Bayesian network. Appl. Energy 2014, 114:1-9.
3. Du J., Yu B., Yao X. Selection of leading industries for coal resource cities based on coupling coordination of industry's technological innovation. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2012, 22(3):317-321.
4. Ebrahimipour V., Suzuki K., Azadeh A. An integrated off-on line approach for increasing stability and effectiveness of automated controlled systems based on pump dependability- case study: offshore industry. J.Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2006, 19(6):542-552.
5. Ge C., Wang G., Ye H. Analysis of the smallest detectable leakage flow rate of negative pressure wave-based leak detection systems for liquid pipelines. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2008, 32(8):1669-1680.
6. Gheyas I.A., Smith L.S. Feature subset selection in large dimentionality domains. Pattern Recognit. 2010, 43(1):5-13.
7. Holmes J.F., Russell G., Allen J.K. 6-Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) and related systems for automated process control in the food industry: an introduction. Robot. Autom. Food Ind. 2013, 130-142.
8. Hu J., Zhang L., Liang W. Detection of small leakage from long transportation pipeline with complex noise. J.Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2011, 24(4):449-457.
9. Kaelbing L.P., Littman M.L., Moore A.W. Reinforcement Learning: a Survey 1996, aeXiv preprint cs/9605103.
10. Karassik I.J., Krutzsch W.C., Fraser W.H., Messina J.P. Pump Handbook 1986, vol. 3. McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Liang W., Kang J., Zhang L. Leak detection for long transportation pipeline using a state coupling analysis of pump units. J.Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2013, 26(4):586-593.
12. Lopes dos Santos P., Azevedo-Perdicoulis T., Jank G., Ramos J., Martins de Carvalho J. Leakage detection and location in gas pipelines through an LPV identification approach. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16(12):4657-4665.
13. Poole D., Goebel R., Aleliunas R. Theorist: a Logical Reasoning System for Defaults and Diagnosis 1987, Springer.
14. Ridvan S. Hidden Markov model-based classification of heart valve disease with PCA for dimension reduction. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2012, 25(7):1523-1528.
15. Saha A., Jonathan Wu Q. Perceptual image quality assessment using phase deviation sensitive energy features. Signal Process. 2013, 93(11):3182-3191.
16. Sun L., Chang N. Integrated-signal-based leak location method for liquid pipelines. J.Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2014, 32:311-318.
17. Taylor J.R. Risk Analysis for Process Plant, Pipelines and Transport 2003, Routledge.
18. Veland H., Aven T. Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013, 110:34-40.
19. Wang X.,D., Dong J.L. Numerical study on the performances of steam-jet vacuum pump at different operating conditions. Vacuum 2010, 84(11):1341-1346.
20. Zhang X.J., Xiong C.H., Ding Y., Feng M.J., Xiong Y.L. Milling stability analysis with simultaneously considering the structural mode coupling effect and regenerative effect. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2012, 53(1):127-140.