Retrospective Study on Effectiveness of Activ L Total Disc Replacement: Clinical and Radiographical Results of 1-to 3-Year Follow-up

Spine

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2015, Pages E411-E417

  Lu, Shibao ^a   Kong, Chao ^a   Hai, Yong ^a   Wang, Qingyi ^a   Zang, Lei ^a   Kang, Nan ^a   Meng, Xianglong ^a   Wang, Yu ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

activ L; degenerative disc disease; intervertebral disc height; lumbar disc; Oswestry Disability Index; range of motion; retrospective case series; total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISK PROSTHESIS; DISKOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RETRACTED ARTICLE;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84958114700     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000773     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gillet P,. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 338-45.
2. Geisler FH,. Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 46-57; discussion 46-57.
3. Helgeson MD, Bevevino AJ, Hilibrand AS,. Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease. Spine J 2013; 13: 342-51.
4. Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J 2013; 13: 1339-49.
5. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el H, Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18: 353-9.
6. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Charite total disc replacement-clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 183-95.
7. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 2009; 9: 374-86.
8. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005; 30: 1576-83; discussion E388-90.
9. Lu SB, Wang QY, Hai Y, [Total lumbar disc replacement with SB Charite III prosthesis: Chinese experience with more than two years follow-up]. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese Journal of Surgery] 2008; 46: 342-5.
10. Rao MJ, Cao SS,. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134: 149-58.
11. Yajun W, Yue Z, Xiuxin H, A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1250-61.
12. Kurtz S,. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement and medical devices. In: Kurtz S, ed. UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2009.
13. van den Eerenbeemt KD, Ostelo RW, van Royen BJ, Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1262-80.
14. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001; 26: 1873-8.
15. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 424-33.
16. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 12-20.
17. David T,. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 2007; 32: 661-6.
18. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 2005; 30: 1565-75; discussion E387-91.
19. Trouillier H, Kern P, Refior HJ, A prospective morphological study of facet joint integrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 174-82.
20. Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW, Surgical interbody research group-radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2001; 10: E11.
21. Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD, CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up. Spine 2007; 32: 1012-8.
22. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007; 32: 1155-62; discussion 63.
23. Katsimihas M, Bailey CS, Issa K, Prospective clinical and radiographic results of CHARITE III artificial total disc arthroplasty at 2-to 7-year follow-up: a Canadian experience. Can J Surg 2010; 53: 408-414.
24. Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, LeHuec JC,. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine 2003; 28: 1023-6.
25. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 2005; 30: 1407-11.