Evaluation of the biocompatibility of regenerated cellulose hydrogels with high strength and transparency for ocular applications

Journal of Biomaterials Applications

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1049-1059

  Patchan, Marcia W ^a   Chae, J Jeremy ^b   Lee, Justin D ^b   Calderon Colon, Xiomara ^a   Maranchi, Jeffrey P ^a   McCally, Russell L ^a,b   Schein, Oliver D ^b   Elisseeff, Jennifer H ^b   Trexler, Morgana M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

bandage contact lens; biocompatibility; Cellulose; hydrogel; ocular injury

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELLULOSE; CONTACT LENSES; FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS; LENSES; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; TRANSPARENCY;

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; HIGH STRENGTH; LENS GEOMETRY; OCULAR INJURY; OPTICAL TRANSPARENCY; REGENERATED CELLULOSE; SYNTHESIS PARAMETERS;

HYDROGELS;

CELLULOSE; ENDOTOXIN; OXYGEN; BIOMATERIAL; HYDROGEL; POLYMER; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA EDEMA; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; EYE DISCOMFORT; EYE IRRITATION; FEMALE; HYDROGEL; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; MALE; MATERIAL STATE; MATERIALS TESTING; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SYNTHESIS; THICKNESS; WATER CONTENT; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CORNEA; CORNEAL INJURIES; EYE INJURIES; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; PATHOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; RABBIT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLULOSE; CONTACT LENSES; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; CORNEAL INJURIES; EYE INJURIES; FEMALE; HYDROGELS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; OXYGEN; PERMEABILITY; POLYMERS; RABBITS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SILICONES;

EID: 84958064210     PISSN: 08853282     EISSN: 15308022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885328215616273     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Patchan M, Graham JL, Xia Z, et al. Synthesis and properties of regenerated cellulose-based hydrogels with high strength and transparency for potential use as an ocular bandage. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2013; 33: 3069-3076.
2. Chae JJ, Mulreany DG, Guo Q, et al. Application of a collagen-based membrane and chondroitin sulfate-based hydrogel adhesive for the potential repair of severe ocular surface injuries. Mil Med 2014; 179: 686-694.
3. Menghini M, Knecht PB, Kaufmann C, et al. Treatment of traumatic corneal abrasions: a three-arm, prospective, randomized study. Ophthalmic Res 2013; 50: 13-18.
4. Sharma A, Kaur R, Kumar S, et al. Fibrin glue versus N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in corneal perforations. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 291-298.
5. Petersen N, Gatenholm P,. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011; 91: 1277-1286.
6. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P, et al. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angewandte Chemie International Ed 2005; 44: 3358-3393.
7. Thoorens G, Krier F, Leclercq B, et al. Microcrystalline cellulose, a direct compression binder in a quality by design environment-a review. Int J Pharmaceut 2014; 473: 64-72.
8. Simmons PA, Donshik PC, Kelly WF, et al. Conditioning of hydrogel lenses by a multipurpose solution containing an ocular lubricant. Clao J 2001; 27: 192-194.
9. Okan D, Woo K, Ayello EA, et al. The role of moisture balance in wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007; 20: 39-53.
10. Sibbald RG, Elliott JA, Ayello EA, et al. Optimizing the moisture management tightrope with wound bed preparation. Adv Skin Wound Care 2015; 28: 466-476.
11. Tammelin T, Abburi R, Gestranius M, et al. Correlation between cellulose thin film supramolecular structures and interactions with water. Soft Matter 2015; 11: 4273-4282.
12. She Y, Li J, Xiao B, et al. Evaluation of a novel artificial tear in the prevention and treatment of dry eye in an animal model. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2015; 31: 31-31.
13. Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, et al. Microbial cellulose-the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 145-151.
14. Pal K, Banthia AK, Majumdar DK,. Polymeric hydrogels: characterization and biomedical applications. Designed Monom Polym 2009; 12: 197-220.
15. Chang C, Zhang L,. Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects. Carbohydr Polym 2011; 84: 40-53.
16. Oprea A-M, Ciolacu D, Neamtu A, et al. Cellulose/chondroitin sulfate hydrogels: synthesis, drug loading/release properties, and biocompatibility. Cell Chem Technol 2010; 44: 369-378.
17. Lacin NT,. Development of biodegradable antibacterial cellulose based hydrogel membranes for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 2014; 67: 22-27.
18. Ballios BG, Cooke MJ, Donaldson L, et al. A hyaluronan-based injectable hydrogel improves the survival and integration of stem cell progeny following transplantation. Stem Cell Rep 2015; 4 (6): 1031-1045.
19. Frankel V, Serafica G, Damien C,. Development and testing of a novel biosynthesized XCell for treating chronic wounds. Surg Technol Int 2004; 12: 27-33.
20. Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, et al. Bacterial synthesized cellulose-artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Progr Polym Sci 2001; 26: 1561-1603.
21. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 419-431.
22. Gulrez SKH, Al-Assaf S and Phillips GO (2011) Hydrogels: Methods of preparation, characterisation and applications, progress in molecular and environmental bioengineering. In: Carpi A (ed.) Analysis and Modeling to Technology Applications. InTech, ISBN: 978-953-307-268-5. DOI: 10.5772/24553. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/progress-in-molecular-and-environmental-bioengineering-from-analysis-and-modeling-to-technology-applications/hydrogels-methods-of-preparation-characterisation-and-applications.
23. Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 431-438.
24. Miyamoto T, Takahashi S, Ito H, et al. Tissue biocompatibility of cellulose and its derivatives. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 125-133.
25. Chhabra M, Prausnitz JM, Radke CJ,. Polarographic method for measuring oxygen diffusivity and solubility in water-saturated polymer films: Application to hypertransmissible soft contact lenses. Industr Eng Chem Res 2008; 47: 3540-3550.
26. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Compañ-Moreno V, Riande E,. Determination of oxygen permeability in soft contact lenses using a polarographic method: estimation of relevant physiological parameters. Industr Eng Chem Res 2008; 47: 3619-3629.
27. Hadassah J, Sehgal PK,. A novel method to measure oxygen permeability and transmissibility of contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2006; 89: 374-380.
28. ANSI. Z80.20-2004E. for Ophthalmics-Contact Lenses-Standard Terminology, Tolerances, Measurements, and Physicochemical Properties. Optical Laboratories Association, Merrifield, VA, 2005.
29. Benjamin WJ, Cappelli QA,. Oxygen permeability (Dk) of thirty-seven rigid contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 103-111.
30. Lonza Walkersville I. Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) kinetic-QCLÔ product guide. Walkersville, MD: Lonza Walkersville, Inc., 2014. http://bio.lonza.com/uploads/tx-mwaxmarketingmaterial/Lonza-ManualsProduct Instructions-Kinetic-QCL-Product-Insert.pdf.
31. Lonza Walkersville I. B-G-Blocker Product Guide. Walkersville, MD: Lonza Walkersville, Inc., 2014. http://bio.lonza.com/uploads/tx-mwaxmarketingmaterial/Lonza-ManualsProductInstructions-B-G-Blocker-Product-Insert.pdf.
32. Trexler MM, Graham JL, Breidenich JL, et al. Cellulose-based hydrogels and methods of making thereof. Google Patents, 2013.
33. Bozkir G, Bozkir M, Dogan H, et al. Measurements of axial length and radius of corneal curvature in the rabbit eye. Acta Med Okayama 1997; 51: 9-11.
34. Olsson B, Sliwkowski A, Langeland K,. Subcutaneous implantation for the biological evaluation of endodontic materials. J Endodontics 1981; 7: 355-367.
35. Macleod TM, Williams G, Sanders R, et al. Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20-week period in the rat model. Br J Plastic Surg 2005; 58: 518-532.
36. ISO 9394. Ophthalmic optics-contact lenses and contact lens care products- determination of biocompatibility by ocular study using rabbit eyes. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.
37. Matsubara M, Kamei Y, Takeda S, et al. Histologic and histochemical changes in rabbit cornea produced by an orthokeratology lens. Eye contact Lens 2004; 30: 198-204; discussion 5-6.
38. French K,. Contact lens material properties: part 3. Oxygen performance. Optician 2005; 230: 16-21.
39. Efron N, Morgan PB, Cameron ID, et al. Oxygen permeability and water content of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optomet Vision Sci 2007; 84: E328-E37.
40. Xia Z, Patchan M, Maranchi J, et al. Determination of crosslinking density of hydrogels prepared from microcrystalline cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 2013; 127: 4537-4541.
41. USFDA. Guidance for industry pyrogen and endotoxins testing. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, June 2012.
42. Malyala P, Singh M,. Endotoxin limits in formulations for preclinical research. J Pharm Sci 2008; 97: 2041-2044.
43. Coté RJ,. Aseptic technique for cell culture. Current protocols in cell biology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2001, pp. 1.3.1-1.3.10.
44. Gao C, Wan Y, Lei X, et al. Polylysine coated bacterial cellulose nanofibers as novel templates for bone-like apatite deposition. Cellulose 2011; 18: 1555-1561.
45. Li Y, Tian C, Tian H, et al. Improvement of bacterial cellulose production by manipulating the metabolic pathways in which ethanol and sodium citrate involved. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 96: 1479-1487.
46. Zhijiang C, Guang Y,. Bacterial cellulose/collagen composite: characterization and first evaluation of cytocompatibility. J Appl Polym Sci 2011; 120: 2938-2944.
47. Belda-Salmeron L, Drew T, Hall L, et al. Objective analysis of contact lens fit. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38: 163-167.
48. Guzman-Aranguez A, Colligris B, Pintor J,. Contact lenses: promising devices for ocular drug delivery. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2013; 29: 189-199.