A multimethod analysis of shared decision-making in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings including family caregivers

Palliative Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 270-278

  Washington, Karla T ^a   Parker Oliver, Debra ^a   Gage, L Ashley ^b   Albright, David L ^c   Demiris, George ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT KEARNEY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

caregivers; decision making; family; Hospices; patient care team

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONAL STRESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPICE INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM MEETING; HOSPICE NURSING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL STAFF; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SHARED DECISION MAKING; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; TIME CONSTRAINT; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; VIDEOCONFERENCING; ADULT; FAMILY; FEMALE; HOSPICE CARE; HUMAN RELATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS;

ADULT; CAREGIVERS; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY; FEMALE; HOSPICE CARE; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 84958047104     PISSN: 02692163     EISSN: 1477030X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269216315601545     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kruse RL, Parker Oliver D, Wittenberg-Lyles E, et al. Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success. Clin Trials 2013; 10 (1): 160-169.
2. Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, Wittenberg-Lyles E, et al. Caregiver participation in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings via videophone technology: a pilot study to improve pain management. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2010; 27 (7): 465-473.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs: hospice conditions of participation., 2008, http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/R65SOMA.pdf
4. Parker Oliver D, Albright DL, Kruse RL, et al. Caregiver evaluation of the ACTIVE intervention: €It was like we were sitting at the table with everyone.€. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2014; 31 (4): 444-453.
5. Parker Oliver D, Washington KT, Wittenberg-Lyles E, et al. €They're part of the team€: participant evaluation of the ACTIVE intervention. Palliat Med 2009; 23 (6): 549-555.
6. Wittenberg-Lyles E, Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, et al. Question asking by family caregivers in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings. Res Gerontol Nurs 2010; 3 (2): 82-88.
7. Towle A, Godolphin W,. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ 1999; 319 (7212): 766-771.
8. Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ,. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (1): 6-8.
9. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S,. Shared decision making-pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (9): 780-781.
10. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (10): 1361-1367.
11. National Health Service Right Care Shared Decision Making Programme and Capita Group. Measuring shared decision making: a review of research evidence., 2012, http://www.rightcare.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Measuring-Shared-Decision-Making-Dec12.pdf
12. Makoul G, Clayman ML,. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60 (3): 301-312.
13. Legare F, Thompson-Leduc P,. Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 96: 281-286.
14. Curtis JR, White DB,. Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences. Chest 2008; 134 (4): 835-843.
15. McGuire AL, McCullough LB, Weller SC, et al. Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care 2005; 43 (5): 466-470.
16. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID,. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006; 1: 16.
17. Belanger E, Rodriguez C, Groleau D,. Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis. Palliat Med 2011; 25 (3): 242-261.
18. Legare F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17 (4): 554-564.
19. Wittenberg-Lyles E, Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, et al. The ACTive intervention in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings: exploring family caregiver and hospice team communication. J Comput Mediat Commun 2010; 15 (3): 465-481.
20. Siminoff LA, Step MM,. A communication model of shared decision making: accounting for cancer treatment decisions. Health Psychol 2005; 24 (4 Suppl.): S99-S105.
21. Braun V, Clarke V,. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 (2): 77-101.
22. Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL,. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2001; 11 (4): 522-537.
23. Couet N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. Epub ahead of print 4 2013. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12054.
24. Campbell JL, Quincy C, Osserman J, et al. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociol Method Res 2013; 42 (3): 294-320.
25. Legare F, Witteman HO,. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff 2013; 32 (2): 276-284.