Utility of reading - Predictor of reading achievement?

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 45, Issue , 2016, Pages 151-158

  Schoor, Cornelia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Expectancy value model of achievement; Reading achievement; Reading behavior; Reading motivation; Utility value of reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957965793     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: 18733425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.024     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson R.C., Wilson P.T., Fielding L.G. Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly 1988, 23(3):285-303. 10.2307/748043.
2. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control 1997, Freeman and Company, New York.
3. Caro D.H., Lehmann R. Achievement inequalities in Hamburg schools: How do they change as students get older?. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2009, 20(4):407-431. 10.1080/09243450902920599.
4. Chow A., Eccles J.S., Salmela-Aro K. Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland. Developmental Psychology 2012, 48(6):1612-1628. 10.1037/a0030194.
5. Cole J.S., Bergin D.A., Whittaker T.A. Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2008, 33(4):609-624. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.10.002.
6. Durik A.M., Vida M., Eccles J.S. Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98(2):382-393. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382.
7. Eccles (Parsons) J., Adler T., Meece J.L. Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46(1):26-43.
8. Eccles J.S. Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Handbook of Competence and Motivation 2005, 105-121. Guilford Press, New York. A.J. Elliot, C.S. Dweck (Eds.).
9. Eccles J.S., Harold R.D. Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying the Eccles' expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 1991, 3(1):7-35. 10.1080/10413209108406432.
10. Eccles J.S., Wigfield A. In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1995, 21(3):215-225. 10.1177/0146167295213003.
11. Eccles J.S., Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53(1):109-132.
12. Guthrie J.T., Van Meter P., Hancock G.R., Alao S., Anderson E., McCann A. Does concept-oriented reading instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text?. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90(2):261-278.
13. Guthrie J.T., Wigfield A., Metsala J.L., Cox K.E. Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading 1999, 3(3):231-256.
14. Hertel S., Hochweber J., Mildner D., Steinert B., Jude N. PISA 2009 Skalenhandbuch 2014, Waxmann, Münster.
15. Hulleman C.S., Durik A.M., Schweigert S.A., Harackiewicz J.M. Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100(2):398-416. 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.
16. Hulleman C.S., Godes O., Hendricks B.L., Harackiewicz J.M. Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 102(4):880-895. 10.1037/a0019506.
17. Husman J., Hilpert J. The intersection of students' perceptions of instrumentality, self-efficacy, and goal orientations in an online mathematics course. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2007, 21(3/4):229-239.
18. Husman J., Derryberry W.P., Crowson H.M., Lomax R. Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2004, 29(1):63-76. 10.1016/s0361-476x(03)00019-5.
19. Jacobs J.E., Lanza S., Osgood D.W., Eccles J.S., Wigfield A. Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development 2002, 73(2):509-527. 10.1111/1467-8624.00421.
20. Kirsch I., De Jong J., Lafontaine D., McQueen J., Mendelovits J., Monseur C. Reading for Change. Performance and Engagement Across Countries. Results From PISA 2000 2002, OECD, Paris, (Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33690904.pdf).
21. Klieme E., Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung Programme for International Student Assessment 2009 (PISA 2009). Version: 1 (Data Set) 2013, IQB - Institut zur Qualitätsentwicklung im Bildungswesen. 10.5159/IQB_PISA_2009_v1.
22. Lens W. The motivational significance of future time perspective: The homecoming of a concept. Psychologica 1988, 1:27-46.
23. Lietz P. A meta-analysis of gender differences in reading achievement at the secondary school level. Studies in Educational Evaluation 2006, 32(4):317-344. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.10.002.
24. Logan S., Johnston R. Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading 2009, 32(2):199-214. 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x.
25. Marks G.N. Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies 2005, 28(5):925-946. 10.1080/01419870500158943.
26. Meece J.L., Wigfield A., Eccles J.S. Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990, 82(1):60-70. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60.
27. Mol S.E., Bus A.G. To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin 2011, 137(2):267-296. 10.1037/a0021890.
28. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups 2000, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
29. OECD PISA 2009 assessment framework - key competencies in reading, mathematics and science Retrieved from. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf.
30. OECD PISA Data analysis manual Retrieved from. http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/free/9809031e.pdf.
31. OECD PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn - student engagement, strategies and practices (Volume III) 2009, 10.1787/9789264083943-en.
32. OECD PISA 2009 Technical Report. OECD Publishing Retrieved from. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en.
33. Pfost M., Artelt C. Reading literacy development in secondary school and the effect of differential institutional learning environments. The Development of Reading Literacy From Early Childhood to Adolescence 2013, 229-277. University of Bamberg Press, Bamberg. M. Pfost, C. Artelt, S. Weinert (Eds.).
34. Pfost M., Dörfler T., Artelt C. Students' extracurricular reading behavior and the development of vocabulary and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences 2013, 26:89-102. 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008.
35. Reardon, S. F. (2003). Sources of educational inequality: The growth of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic test score gaps in kindergarten and first grade. Unpublished manuscript, Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
36. Retelsdorf J., Köller O., Möller J. Reading achievement and reading self-concept - Testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction 2014, 29:21-30. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004.
37. Schaffner E., Philipp M., Schiefele U. Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? A cross-lagged panel model for academic track and nonacademic track students. Journal of Research in Reading 2015, (in press). 10.1111/1467-9817.12027.
38. Schiefele U., Schaffner E., Möller J., Wigfield A. Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly 2012, 47(4):427-463. 10.1002/rrq.030.
39. Stanat P., Rauch D., Segeritz M. Schülerinnen und Schüler mit Migrationshintergrund [Students with migration background]. PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt 2010, 200-230. Münster, Waxmann. E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, M. Prenzel, W. Schneider, P. Stanat (Eds.).
40. Steinmayr R., Spinath B. Konstruktion und erste Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung subjektiver schulischer Werte (SESSW) [Construction and first validation of a scale assessing subjective educational task values]. Diagnostica 2010, 56(4):195-211. 10.1026/0012-1924/a000023.
41. Updegraff K.A., Eccles J.S., Barber B.L., O'Brien K.M. Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses?. Learning and Individual Differences 1996, 8(3):239-259. 10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90016-3.
42. Wigfield A., Eccles J.S. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000, 25(1):68-81. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.