Effect of a task-oriented rehabilitation program on upper extremity recovery following motor stroke the ICARE randomized clinical trial

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 315, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 571-581

  Winstein, Carolee J ^a   Wolf, Steven L ^b   Dromerick, Alexander W ^c   Lane, Christianne J ^a   Nelsen, Monica A ^a   Lewthwaite, Rebecca ^a   Cen, Steven Yong ^a   Azen, Stanley P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEXTERITY TEST; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE ASSESSMENT; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT SAFETY; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TASK ORIENTED MOTOR TRAINING PROGRAM; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; AGED; ARM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; CONVALESCENCE; HAND; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AGED; ARM; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84957921578     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0276     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady M.C., et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 11 (11):CD010820.
2. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards L.G., et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362 (19):1772-1783.
3. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller J.P., et al; EXCITE Investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 296(17):2095-2104.
4. Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007; 31(1):3-10.
5. Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Dromerick A.W., et al; ICARE Investigative Team. Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE): a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurol. 2013; 13(5):5.
6. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S., Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ. 1980; 58(1):113-130.
7. Platz T. Impairment-oriented training (IOT) - scientific concept and evidence-based treatment strategies. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004; 22(3-5):301-315.
8. Winstein C, Lewthwaite R, Blanton S.R., Wolf LB, Wishart L. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: a historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014; 38(3):190-200.
9. Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Schweighofer N. Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In: Stein J, Harvey RL, Winstein CJ, Zorowitz RD, Wittenberg GF, eds. Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Demos Medical; 2015:320-343.
10. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
11. Tretriluxana J, Runnarong N, Tretriluxana S., Prayoonwiwat N, Vachalathiti R, Winstein C. Feasibility investigation of the Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program (ASAP): insights into reach-to-grasp coordination of individuals with postacute stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013; 20(2): 151-160.
12. James GA, Lu ZL, VanMeter J.W., Sathian K., Hu XP, Butler AJ. Changes in resting state effective connectivity in the motor network following rehabilitation of upper extremity poststroke paresis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009; 16(4):270-281.
13. Lum PS, Mulroy S, Amdur R.L., Requejo P., Prilutsky BI, Dromerick AW. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009; 16(4):237-253.
14. Winstein CJ, Kay DB Translating the science into practice: shaping rehabilitation practice to enhance recovery after brain damage. In: Dancause N, Rossignol S, eds. Sensorimotor Rehabilitation: At the Crossroads of Basic and Clinical Sciences. Vol 218. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier BV; 2015:331-360.
15. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer A.L., Morgan B., Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001; 32(7):1635-1639.
16. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago J.E., Cook EW III, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82(6):750-755.
17. Ang JHY, Man DWK. The discriminative power of the Wolf Motor Function Test in assessing upper extremity functions in persons with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006; 29(4):357-361.
18. Wolf SL, McJunkin JP, Swanson M.L., Weiss PS. Pilot normative database for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(3): 443-445.
19. Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier R.L., Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89 (9):1693-1700.
20. Lin KC, Fu T, Wu C.Y., et al. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24(5):486-492.
21. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
22. Cumming G, Finch S. A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educ Psychol Meas. 2001; 61(4):532-574. doi:10.1177/0013164401614002.
23. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R.L., et al. Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology. 2009; 73(3):195-201.
24. Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22(1):78-90.
25. Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L., et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34(9):2173-2180.
26. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go A.S., et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 131(4):e29-e322.
27. Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman A.L., et al; LEAPS Investigative Team. Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(21):2026-2036.
28. Wolf SL, Newton H, Maddy D., et al. The EXCITE trial: relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the Wolf Motor Function Test. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007; 25(5-6):549-562.
29. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(12):861-872.
30. AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(9988):46-55.
31. Minelli C, Gondim FAA, Barreira AA, Dromerick AW Rehabilitation of the upper extremity and basic activities of daily living in the first month after ischemic stroke: an international cohort comparison study. Neurol Int. 2009; 1(1):e4.
32. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004; 35(11):2529-2539.
33. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006; 37(9):2348-2353.
34. Hart T, Tsaousides T, Zanca J.M., et al. Toward a theory-driven classification of rehabilitation treatments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(1) (suppl):S33-44.e2.
35. Rosenbaum L. The whole ball game - overcoming the blind spots in health care reform. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(10):959-962.
36. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P., McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(1): 14-18.
37. Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston M.V., Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002; 16(3):290-295.
38. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I., Kölbel S, Rockstroh B., Taub E. Longer vs shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(10):1374-1377.
39. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int. 2009; 16(3-4): 175-189.
40. Bravi L, Stoykov ME New directions in occupational therapy: implementation of the task-oriented approach in conjunction with cortical stimulation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007; 14(6):68-73.
41. Kaplan RM, Irvin VL Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0132382.