Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1451-1472

  Teng, Dan W ^a   Wallot, Sebastian ^b   Kelty Stephen, Damian G ^a  

^a GRINNELL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Lexical decision; Narrative; Reading; Self paced reading

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84957695121     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9416-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 33, 245–313.
2. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
3. Babylak, M. A. (2004). What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 411–421.
4. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
5. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
8. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
9. Finlay, S. (2014). Predictive analytics, data mining, and big data: Myths, misconceptions and methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Friston, K., Breakspear, M., & Deco, G. (2012). Perception and self-organized criticality. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 44.
11. Gottlieb, G. (2007). On the epigenetic evolution of species-specific perception: The developmental manifold concept. Cognitive Development, 17, 1287–1300.
12. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
13. Harrell, F. E., Lee, K. L., & Mark, D. B. (1996). Tutorial in biostatistics: Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 361–387.
14. Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, & Cognition, 40, 166–190.
15. Holden, J. G., & Rajaraman, S. (2012). The self-organization of a spoken word. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 209.
16. Huntsman, L. A., & Lima, S. D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 289–306.
17. Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (2001). Does sunshine prime loyal? Affective priming in the naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 727–751.
18. Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 563–580.
19. McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). New York: Academic.
20. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
21. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66, 180–194.
22. Rayner, K., & Reichle, E. D. (2010). Models of the reading process. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 787–799.
23. Reichle, E. D., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). Neurophysiological constraints on the eye–mind link. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 361.
24. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270–1281.
25. Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students’ verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 877–896.
26. Slattery, T. J. (2009). Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1969–1975.
27. Turvey, M. T., & Moreno, M. A. (2006). Physical metaphors for the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 7–33.
28. Van Orden, G., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25, 111–172.
29. Van Orden, G., Hollis, G., & Wallot, S. (2012). The blue-collar brain. Frontiers in Physiology, 3, 207.
30. Wallot, S. (2014). From ‘cracking the orthographic code’ to ‘playing with language’: Toward a usage-based foundation of the reading process. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00891.
31. Wallot, S., Hollis, G., & van Rooij, M. (2013). Connected text reading and differences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PLoS One, 8, e71914.
32. Wallot, S., & Kelty-Stephen, D. (2014). Constraints are the solution, not the problem. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00324.
33. Wallot, S., O’Brien, B. A., Haussmann, A., Kloos, A., & Lyby, M. S. (2014). The role of reading time complexity and reading speed in text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1745–1765.
34. Yuan, K. H., & Hayashi, K. (2003). Bootstrap approach to inference and power analysis based on three test statistics for covariance structure models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 93–110.
35. Zhou, W., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2013). A validation of parafoveal semantic information extraction in reading Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S51–S63.