A validation of parafoveal semantic information extraction in reading Chinese

Journal of Research in Reading

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Zhou, Wei ^a   Kliegl, Reinhold ^b   Yan, Ming ^b  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chinese; Preview benefit; Reading; Semantic

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876303593     PISSN: 01410423     EISSN: 14679817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2013.01556.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A. & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 875-890. doi:10.3758/BF03194444.
2. Baayen, R.H. (2008). Practical data analysis for the language sciences with R. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bates, D. & Maechler, M. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999375-32) [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
4. Beijing Language Institute Publisher (1986). Modern Chinese word frequency dictionary. (in Chinese) Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Publisher.
5. Bertram, R. & Hyönä, J. (2007). The interplay between parafoveal preview and morphological processing in reading. In R. vanGompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. (pp. 391-407). New York: Elsevier.
6. Chen, H.-C. & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 511-518. doi:10.3758/BF03196186.
7. Cui, L., Yan, G., Bai, X., Hyönä, J., Wang, S. & Liversedge, S.P. (2012). Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: An eye-movement-contingent display change study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.667423.
8. Drieghe, D., Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239-1249. doi: 10.1080/17470210701467953.
9. Engbert, R. & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43(9), 1035-1045. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1.
10. Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H. & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1079-1100. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.1079.
11. Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263-279. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841.
12. Hohenstein, S., Laubrock, J. & Kliegl, R. (2010). Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1150-1170. doi:10.1037/a0020233.
13. Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Inhoff, A.W. (1989). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 444-461. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90021-1.
15. Inhoff, A.W., Radach, R., Starr, M. & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a visual process. Oxford: Elsevier.
16. Juhasz, B.J., White, S.J., Liversedge, S.P. & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1560-1579. doi:10.1037/a0012319.
17. Kambe, G. (2004). Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 279-292. doi:10.3758/BF03194879.
18. Kennedy, A. & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153-168. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037.
19. Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., Yan, M. & McDonald, S. (2013). How preview space/time translate into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658073.
20. Kliegl, R., Masson, M.E.J. & Richter, E.M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 655-681. doi:10.1080/13506280902986058.
21. Laubrock, J. & Hohenstein, S. (2012). Orthographic consistency and parafoveal preview benefit: A resource-sharing account of language differences in processing of phonological and semantic codes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 292-293. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000209.
22. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Computer software].
23. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5.
24. Rayner, K., Balota, D.A. & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473-483. doi:10.1037/h0080111.
25. Rayner, K., White, S.J., Kambe, G., Miller, B. & Liversedge, S.P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixation in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements. (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
26. Shu, H. & Anderson, R.C. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(1), 78-89. doi:10.1598/RRQ.32.1.5.
27. Tsai, J.-L., Kliegl, R. & Yan, M. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 17-23. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.004.
28. Tsai, J.-L. & McConkie, G.W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements. (pp. 159-176). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
29. Tsang, Y.-K. & Chen, H.-C. (2012). Eye movement control in reading: Logographic Chinese versus alphabetic scripts. PsyCh Journal, 1(2), 128-142. doi:10.1002/pchj.10.
30. Van Orden, G.C. (1987). A rows is a rose: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198. doi: 10.3758/BF03197716.
31. Wickham, H (2009). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.
32. Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E.M., Nuthmann, A. & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705-725. doi:10.1080/17470210903114858.
33. Yan, M., Richter, E.M., Shu, H. & Kliegl, R. (2009). Chinese readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561-566. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.3.561.
34. Yan, M., Risse, S., Zhou, X. & Kliegl, R. (2012). Preboundary duration modulates semantic preview benefit for word n+1 and n+2 in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1093-1111. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9274-7.
35. Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H. & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 1069-1075. doi:10.1037/a0026935.
36. Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, X. & Rayner, K. (2012). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 1079-1091. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9281-8.
37. Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y. & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 15, 1192-1204. doi:10.1037/a0013554.
38. Yen, M.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Tzeng, O.J.-L. & Hung, D.L. (2008). Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese sentences. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1033-1045. doi:10.3758/MC.36.5.1033.
39. Zhou, X. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1245-1265. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1245.
40. Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M. & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 525-565. doi:10.1080/016909699386185.