Generation and inheritance of targeted mutations in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using the CRISPR/Cas System

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Butler, Nathaniel M ^a   Atkins, Paul A ^b   Voytas, Daniel F ^b   Douches, David S ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; GUIDE RNA; SINGLE GUIDE RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS; ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DIPLOIDY; GEMINIVIRIDAE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; INDEL MUTATION; INHERITANCE; MOLECULAR CLONING; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENE; POTATO; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOMATIC MUTATION; STALS1 GENE; TETRAPLOIDY; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; MUTATION; PLANT GENOME; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE TARGETING; GENOME, PLANT; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; MUTATION; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84957112148     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144591     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Klömper W, Qaim M. A meta-Analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. albertini emidio, editor. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e111629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
2. Hunter P. "Genetically Modified Lite" placates public but not activists: New technologies to manipulate plant genomes could help to overcome public concerns about GM crops. EMBO Rep. 2014; 15: 1-4.
3. Curtin SJ, Voytas DF, Stupar RM. Genome engineering of crops with designer nucleases. Plant Genome J. 2012; 5: 42-50.
4. Takeuchi R, Lambert AR, Mak AN-S, Jacoby K, Dickson RJ, Gloor GB, et al. Tapping natural reservoirs of homing endonucleases for targeted gene modification. PNAS. 2011; 108: 13077-13082. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.1107719108
5. Stoddard B. Homing endonucleases: from microbial genetic invaders to reagents for targeted DNA modification. Structure. 2011; 19: 7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.12.003
6. Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, Barlow KA, Wang J, Xia DF, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 143-148. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1755
7. Miller JC, Holmes MC, Wang J, Guschin DY, Lee Y-L, Rupniewski I, et al. An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25: 778-785.
8. Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30: 390-392. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2199
9. Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, Moehle EA, Worden SE, et al. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2009; 459: 437-441.
10. Wendt T, Holm PB, Starker CG, Christian M, Voytas DF, Brinch-Pedersen H, et al. TAL effector nucleases induce mutations at a pre-selected location in the genome of primary barley transformants. Plant Mol Biol. 2013; 83: 279-285. doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0078-4
11. Curtin SJ, Zhang F, Sander JD, Haun WJ, Starker C, Baltes NJ, et al. Targeted mutagenesis of duplicated genes in soybean with zinc-finger nucleases. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156: 466-473. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.172981
12. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V. Plant genome editing made easy: Targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods. 2013; 9: 39. doi: 10. 1186/1746-4811-9-39
13. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNAguided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012; 337: 816-821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
14. Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. PNAS. 2012; 109: E2579-E2586.
15. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC, Doudna JA. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNAguided endonuclease Cas9. Nature. 2014; 507: 62-67. doi: 10.1038/nature13011
16. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013; 339: 819-823. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143
17. Palmgren MG, Edenbrandt AK, Vedel SE, Andersen MM, Landes X, Østerberg JT, et al. Are we ready for back-To-nature crop breeding? Trends Plant Sci. 2014; 1-10.
18. Curtis M, Grossniklaus U. A gateway cloning vector set for high-Throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol. 2003; 133: 462-469.
19. Baltes NJ, Gil-Humanes J, Cermak T, Atkins PA, Voytas DF. DNA replicons for plant genome engineering. Plant Cell. 2014; 26: 151-163. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.119792
20. PGSC. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature. 2011; 475: 189-195. doi: 10. 1038/nature10158
21. Felcher KJ, Coombs JJ, Massa AN, Hansey CN, Hamilton JP, Veilleux RE, et al. Integration of two diploid potato linkage maps with the potato genome sequence. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e36347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036347
22. Verhoeven HA, Dijkhuis P. Introduction of foreign genes into potato cultivars Bintje and Desiree using an Agrobacterium tumefacients binary vector. Plant Cell Rep. 1988; 7: 47-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00272976
23. Jansky SH, Chung YS, Kittipadukal P. M6: A diploid potato inbred line for use in breeding and genetics research. J Plant Regist. 2014; 8: 195-199.
24. Endo M, Toki S. Creation of herbicide-Tolerant crops by gene targeting. J Pestic Sci. 2013; 38: 49-59.
25. Farboud B, Meyer BJ. Dramatic enhancement of genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 through improved guide RNA design. Genetics. 2015; 199: 959-971. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.175166
26. Xu H, Xiao T, Chen C, Li W, Meyer C, Wu Q, et al. Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design. Genome Res. 2015; gr.191452.115.
27. Qi Y, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Baller JA, Cleland SC, Ryu Y, et al. Increasing frequencies of site-specific mutagenesis and gene targeting in Arabidopsis by manipulating DNA repair pathways. Genome Res. 2013; 23: 547-554. doi: 10.1101/gr.145557.112
28. Bortesi L, Fischer R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv. 2015; 33: 41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006
29. Smith J, Schloss J, Mazur B. Functional expression of plant acetolactate synthase genes in Escherichia coli. PNAS. 1989; 86: 4179-4183.
30. Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D, Jones JD, Kamoun S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 691-693. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2655
31. Brooks C, Nekrasov V, Lippman ZB, Van Eck J. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats /CRISPR-Associated9 system. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166: 1292-1297. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.247577
32. Lor VS, Starker CG, Voytas DF, Weiss D, Olszewski NE. Targeted mutagenesis of the tomato PROCERA gene using transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166: 1288-1291. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.247593
33. Jia H, Wang N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e93806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093806