Breaking Through the "glass Ceiling" of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Spine

Volumn 41, Issue , 2016, Pages s39-s43

  Phillips, Frank M ^a   Cheng, Ivan ^b   Rampersaud, Y Raja ^c   Akbarnia, Behrooz A ^b   Pimenta, Luiz ^d   Rodgers, W B ^e   Uribe, Juan S ^f   Khanna, Nitin ^g   Smith, William D ^h   Youssef, Jim A ⁱ   Sulaiman, Wale A R ^j   Tohmeh, Antoine ^k   Cannestra, Andrew ^l   Wohns, Richard N W ^m   Okonkwo, David O ⁿ   Acosta, Frank ^o   Rodgers, Evelyn J ^e   Andersson, Gunnar ^a  

^a RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d Instituto de Patologia da Coluna   (Brazil)

^e St Mary's Health Center   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^g Orthopaedic Specialists of Northwest Indiana   (United States)

^h University Medical Center   (United States)

ⁱ Spine Colorado   (United States)

^j OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION   (United States)

^k Northwest Orthopaedic Specialists   (United States)

^l Lyerly Neurosurgery   (United States)

^m Neo Spine   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST CONTROL; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; SPINE; SURGERY;

HUMANS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SPINE;

EID: 84956960060     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001482     Document Type: Editorial

References (69)

1. McAfee PC, Phillips FM, Andersson G, et al. Minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S271-3.
2. Buvanendran A, Thillainathan V. Preoperative and postoperative anesthetic and analgesic techniques for minimally invasive surgery of the spine. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S274-80.
3. Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E. Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S368-74.
4. Kim CW. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S281-6.
5. Allen RT, Garfin SR. The economics of minimally invasive spine surgery: the value perspective. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S375-82.
6. Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, et al. A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S322-30.
7. Uribe JS, Dakwar E, Le TV, et al. Minimally invasive surgery treatment for thoracic spine tumor removal: a mini-open, lateral approach. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S347-54.
8. Smith WD, Dakwar E, Le TV, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for traumatic spinal pathologies: a mini-open, lateral approach in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S338-46.
9. Mundis GM, Akbarnia BA, Phillips FM. Adult deformity correction through minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S312-21.
10. Karikari IO, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S294-301.
11. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV, Fu KM, et al. Less invasive surgery for treating adult spinal deformities: ceiling effects for deformity correction with 3 different techniques. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E12.
12. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, et al. Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S302-11.
13. Lehmen JA, Gerber EJ. MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics. Eur Spine J 2015;24 (suppl 3):287-313.
14. Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, et al. Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472: 1727-37.
15. Goldstein CLR, Phillips FM, Rampersaud YR. Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluations of open versus minimally invasive Posterior or transforamer lumbar fusion: a review. Spine 2016; Epub ahead of print.
16. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA. Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S355-60.
17. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ. Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:393-7.
18. Mundis GM, Akbarnia BA, Phillips FM. Adult deformity correction through minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine 2010;35 (26 suppl):S312-21.
19. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, et al. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E8.
20. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, et al. Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E7.
21. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E9.
22. Deukmedjian AR, Dakwar E, Ahmadian A, et al. Early outcomes of minimally invasive anterior longitudinal ligament release for correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity. Sci World J 2012;2012:789698.
23. Amin BY, Mummaneni PV, Ibrahim T, et al. Four-level minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35 (2 suppl).
24. Berjano P, Lamartina C. Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2013;22 (suppl 2):S242-53.
25. Caputo AM, Michael KW, Chapman TM, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1558-63.
26. Deukmedjian AR, Ahmadian A, Bach K, et al. Minimally invasive lateral approach for adult degenerative scoliosis: lessons learned. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35:E4.
27. Johnson RD, Valore A, Villaminar A, et al. Pelvic parameters of sagittal balance in extreme lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disc disease. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:576-81.
28. Costanzo G, Zoccali C, Maykowski P, et al. The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 2014;23 (suppl 6): 699-704.
29. Dahdaleh NS, Smith ZA, Snyder LA, et al. Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion: outcomes and deformity correction. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2014;25:353-60.
30. Dangelmajer S, Zadnik PL, Rodriguez ST, et al. Minimally invasive spine surgery for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E7.
31. Manwaring JC, Bach K, Ahmadian AA, et al. Management of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity with minimally invasive anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;20:515-22.
32. Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Bonfield CM, et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior segmental stabilization in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E11.
33. Murray G, Beckman J, Bach K, et al. Complications and neurological deficits following minimally invasive anterior column release for adult spinal deformity: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 2015;24 (suppl 3):397-404.
34. Karikari IO, Nimjee SM, Hardin CA, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion approach for isolated thoracic and thoracolumbar spine diseases: initial clinical experience and early outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:368-75.
35. Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP, et al. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:242-50.
36. Uddin OM, Haque R, Sugrue PA, et al. Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;23:798-806.
37. Acosta FL, Liu J, Slimack N, et al. Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;15: 92-6.
38. Lykissas MG, Cho W, Aichmair A, et al. Is there any relation between the amount of curve correction and postoperative neurologic deficit or pain in patients undergoing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion?. Spine 2013;38:1656-62.
39. Meredith DS, Kepler CK, Huang RC, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine: technical report and early outcomes. HSS J 2013;9:25-31.
40. Phillips FM, Isaacs RE, Rodgers WB, et al. Adult degenerative scoliosis treated with XLIF: clinical and radiographic results of a prospective multi-center study with 24-month follow-up. Spine 2013;38:1853-61.
41. Ahmadian A, Bach K, Bolinger B, et al. Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Multicenter clinical outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:740-6.
42. Khajavi K, Shen AY. Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2014;23:1215-23.
43. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV, Fu KM, et al. Less invasive surgery for treating adult spinal deformities: ceiling effects for deformity correction with 3 different techniques. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36: E12.
44. Uribe JS, Deukmedjian AR, Mummaneni PV, et al. Complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgical techniques. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E15.
45. Park P, Wang MY, Lafage V, et al. Comparison of two minimally invasive surgery strategies to treat adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;22:374-80.
46. Mummaneni PV, Park P, Fu KM, et al. Does minimally invasive percutaneous posterior instrumentation reduce risk of proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery? a propensity-matched cohort analysis. Neurosurgery 2016;78:101-8.
47. Haque RM, Mundis GM Jr, Ahmed Y, et al. Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E13.
48. Caputo AM, Michael KW, Chapman TM Jr, et al. Clinical outcomes of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Sci World J 2012;2012:680643.
49. Massey GM, Caputo AM, Michael KW, et al. Lumbar facet cyst resolution following anterior interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1771-3.
50. Kanter AS, Gandhoke GS. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35 (supp3); Video 20.
51. Ahmadian A, Verma S, Mundis GM Jr, et al. Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19: 314-20.
52. Nacar OA, Ulu MO, Pekmezci M, et al. Surgical treatment of thoracic disc disease via minimally invasive lateral transthoracic trans/retropleural approach: analysis of 33 patients. Neurosurg Rev 2013;36:455-65.
53. Deviren V, Kuelling FA, Poulter G, et al. Minimal invasive anterolateral transthoracic transpleural approach: a novel technique for thoracic disc herniation. A review of the literature, description of a new surgical technique and experience with first 12 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:E40-8.
54. Kotwal S, Kawaguchi S, Lebl D, et al. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcome at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2015;28: 119-25.
55. Cheng I, Briseno MR, Arrigo RT, et al. Outcomes of two different techniques using the lateral approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. Global Spine J 2015;5:308-14.
56. Lucio JC, VanConia RB, Deluzio KJ, et al. Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2012;5:65-74.
57. Smith WD, Christian G, Serrano S, et al. A comparison of perioperative charges and outcome between open and mini-open approaches for anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:673-80.
58. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Bydon A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years. World Neurosurg 2012;78: 178-84.
59. Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg 2014;82:230-8.
60. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Witham TF, et al. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011;54:33-7.
61. Rampersaud YR, Gray R, Lewis SJ, et al. Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. SAS J 2011;5:29-35.
62. Khajavi K, Shen A, Lagina M, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion stratified by preoperative diagnosis. Eur Spine J 2015;24 (suppl 3): 322-30.
63. Khajavi K, Shen A, Hutchison A. Substantial clinical benefit of minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2015;24 (suppl 3):314-21.
64. Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM Jr, Moazzaz P, et al. Anterior column realignment (ACR) for focal kyphotic spinal deformity using a lateral transpsoas approach and ALL release. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014;27:29-39.
65. Berjano P, Damilano M, Ismael M, et al. Anterior column realignment (ACR) technique for correction of sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 2015;24 (suppl 3):451-3.
66. Deukmedjian AR, Le TV, Baaj AA, et al. Anterior longitudinal ligament release using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a cadaveric feasibility study and report of 4 clinical cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 17: 530-9.
67. Marchi L, Oliveira L, Amaral R, et al. Anterior elongation as a minimally invasive alternative for sagittal imbalance-a case series. HSS J 2012;8:122-7.
68. Turner JD, Akbarnia BA, Eastlack RK, et al. Radiographic outcomes of anterior column realignment for adult sagittal plane deformity: a multicenter analysis. Eur Spine J 2015;24 (suppl 3): 427-32.
69. Uribe JS, Smith DA, Dakwar E, et al. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;17:476-85.