Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 798-806

  Uddin, Omar M ^a   Haque, Raqeeb ^a   Sugrue, Patrick A ^a   Ahmed, Yousef M ^a   El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y ^a   Press, Joel M ^b   Koski, Tyler ^a   Fessler, Richard G ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult degenerative scoliosis; Adult spinal deformity; Cost benefit; Cost effectiveness; Minimally invasive spine surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADULT DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS; ADULT DISEASE; AGED; BLEEDING; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DURAL TEAR; DYSESTHESIA; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KYPHOSIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOTOR DEFICIT; OPEN SURGERY; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PARESTHESIA; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RADIATING PAIN; ROD FRACTURE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL INFECTION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84974712262     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14560     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Allen RT, Garfin SR: The economics of minimally invasive spine surgery: the value perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 (26 Suppl):S375-S382, 2010
2. Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S: Long-term 2-to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1566-1575, 2013
3. Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, Khalsa K, Goldstein TB: Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:459-467, 2008
4. Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Cunningham M, Shaffrey C, Shelokov A, et al: Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2186-2190, 2009
5. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR II, Glassman SD, Johnson JR: Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2089-2092, 2003
6. Carter OD, Haynes SG: Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Epidemiol 16:537-544, 1987
7. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS: Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E8, 2010
8. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV: Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 9:560-565, 2008
9. Haque RM, Mundis GM Jr, Ahmed Y, El Ahmadieh TY, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV, et al: Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients. Neurosurg Focus 36(5):E13, 2014
10. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, et al: Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3:98-105, 2005
11. Kim YB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kim YW, Blanke K, Stobbs G, et al: The morbidity of an anterior thoracolumbar approach: adult spinal deformity patients with greater than five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:822-826, 2009
12. Lucio JC, Vanconia RB, Deluzio KJ, Lehmen JA, Rodgers JA, Rodgers W: Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 5:65-74, 2012
13. McCarthy I, Hostin R, O'Brien M, Saigal R, Ames CP: Health economic analysis of adult deformity surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 24:293-304, 2013
14. Mummaneni PV, Tu TH, Ziewacz JE, Akinbo OC, Deviren V, Mundis GM: The role of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Neurosurg Clin N Am 24:231-248, 2013
15. Mundis GM, Akbarnia BA, Phillips FM: Adult deformity correction through minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 (26 Suppl):S312-S321, 2010
16. Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M: Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 4:304-309, 2006
17. Park P, Foley KT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E16, 2008
18. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ: Costeffectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years. World Neurosurg 78:178-184, 2012
19. Pelton MA, Phillips FM, Singh K: A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1914-1919, 2012
20. Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, et al: Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1082-1085, 2005
21. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Hamill CL, et al: Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:817-824, 2011
22. Tribus CB: Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:174-183, 2003
23. Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA: An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 12:694-699, 2010
24. Wang MY, Lerner J, Lesko J, McGirt MJ: Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:324-328, 2012
25. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV: Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E9, 2010
26. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV, Fu KM, Anand N, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS, et al: Less invasive surgery for treating adult spinal deformities: ceiling effects for deformity correction with 3 different techniques. Neurosurg Focus 36(5):E12, 2014