Comparison of two minimally invasive surgery strategies to treat adult spinal deformity

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 374-380

  Park, Paul ^j   Wang, Michael Y ^b   Lafage, Virginie ^c   Nguyen, Stacie ^l   Ziewacz, John ^a   Okonkwo, David O ^d   Uribe, Juan S ^e   Eastlack, Robert K ^f   Anand, Neel ^g   Haque, Raqeeb ^h   Fessler, Richard G ⁱ   Kanter, Adam S ^d   Deviren, Vedat ^a   La Marca, Frank ^j   Smith, Justin S ^k   Shaffrey, Christopher I ^k   Mundis, Gregory M ^l   Mummaneni, Praveen V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^f SCRIPPS CLINIC   (United States)

^g CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

ⁱ RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^l SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR SPINAL DISORDERS   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Adult; Minimally invasive; Scoliosis; Spinal deformity; Spinal fusion surgery; Spinopelvic alignment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; COBB ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG PAIN; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE MALFORMATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; AGED; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84929941019     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B: Limitations and ceiling effects with circumferential minimally invasive correction techniques for adult scoliosis: analysis of radiological outcomes over a 7-year experience. Neurosurg Focus 36(5):E14, 2014
2. Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S: Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1566-1575, 2013
3. Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, Khalsa K, Goldstein TB: Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:459-467, 2008
4. Benglis DM, Elhammady MS, Levi AD, Vanni S: Minimally invasive anterolateral approaches for the treatment of back pain and adult degenerative deformity. Neurosurgery 63 (3 Suppl):191-196, 2008
5. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS: Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28(30):E8, 2010
6. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV: Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 9:560-565, 2008
7. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP: The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271-273, 1980
8. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR: Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:682-688, 2005
9. Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Schwab FJ, Dimar JR, Lowe TG: The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2764-2770, 2007
10. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, et al: Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3:98-105, 2005
11. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP: Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E599-E606, 2009
12. Lamartina C, Berjano P, Petruzzi M, Sinigaglia A, Casero G, Cecchinato R, et al: Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21 (Suppl 1):S27-S31, 2012
13. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB: Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21:2265-2270, 2012
14. Mummaneni PV, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Park P, Wang MY, La Marca F, et al: The minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: a reproducible rational framework for decision making in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus 36(5):E6, 2014
15. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435-443, 2006
16. Park P, Foley KT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E16, 2008
17. Park P, La Marca F: Combined "hybrid" open and minimally invasive surgical correction of adult thoracolumbar scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 72:151-159, 2013
18. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V: Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2224-2231, 2010
19. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, et al: Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E803-E812, 2013
20. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, Xiangqian F: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1615-1620, 2010
21. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS: Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E7, 2010
22. Wang HL, Lü FZ, Jiang JY, Ma X, Xia XL, Wang LX: Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Chin Med J (Engl) 124:3868-3874, 2011
23. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J: Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19:1780-1784, 2010
24. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV: Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E9, 2010
25. Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK, Harrop JS: Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E3, 2010