The role of reflection, reflection on roles: Practice-based innovation through theatre-based learning

Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 173-191

  Passila A ^a   Oikarinen, T ^a   Vince, R ^b  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956811061     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Alvesson, M. (1995). The meaning and meaninglessness of postmodernism: some ironic remarks. Organization Studies, 16, 1047–1075.
2. Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organizationstudies. Academy of Management Review, 17, 432–464.
3. Barry, D. (2008). The art of… In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook ofnew approaches in management and organization (pp. 31–41). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
4. Boal, A. (1992). Games for actors and non-actors (A. Jackson, Trans.). London: Routledge.
5. Boal, A. (1995). The rainbow of desire (A. Jackson, Trans.). London: Routledge.
6. Boal, A. (1996). Politics, education and change. In J. O’Toole & K. Donelan (Eds.), Drama, culture and empowerment (pp. 47–52). Brisbane: IDEA Publications.
7. Boud, D., Cressey, P., & Docherty, P. (Eds.). (2006). Productive reflection at work. London: Routledge.
8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198–213.
9. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.
10. Clark, T. (2008). Performing the organization. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 401–411). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
11. Coopey, J. (2007). Theatre in management and organization development: a critique of currenttrends. In M. Reynolds & R. Vince (Eds.), The handbook of experiential learning andmanagement education (pp. 169–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Cunliffe, A. (2009). Reflexivity, learning and reflexive practice. In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development. London: Sage.
13. Dehler, G. (1998). ‘Relevance’ in management research: a critical reappraisal. Management Learning, 29, 69–89.
14. Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing practices in service: capturing practice-based knowledge forinnovation. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 35–64.
15. Ellström, P.-E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.
16. Errington, E. (1992). Towards a socially critical drama education. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
17. Freire, P. (1974). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
18. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom ethics, democracy, and civic courage (P. Clarke, Trans., Foreword by D. Macedo). Lanham and Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
19. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
20. Gherardi, S., Niccolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Towards a social understanding of how peoplelearn in organizations. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–297.
21. Harmaakorpi, V., & Melkas, H. (2005). Knowledge management in regional innovation networks: The case of Lahti, Finland. European Planning Studies, 13(5), 641–659.
22. Harmaakorpi, V., & Mutanen, A. (2008). Knowledge production in networked practice-basedinnovation processes–interrogative model as a methodological approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 3, 87–101.
23. Heikkinen, H. (2002). Draaman maailmat oppimisalueina: draamakasvatuksen vakava leikillisyys [Drama Worlds as Learning Areas–the Serious Playfulness of Drama Education]. Universityof Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. (In Finnish.)
24. Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-A. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes ofinnovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.
25. Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emansipatoryaction research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 94–105). London: Routledge.
26. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
27. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 567–606). London: Sage Publications.
28. Kemmis, S., & Wilkinson, M. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice. Partnership for socialjustice in education (pp. 21–36). London: Routledge.
29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning–legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lester, R. K., & Piore, M. J. (2004). Innovation–the missing dimension. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
32. Mattson, M., & Kemmis, S. (2007). Praxis-related research: serving two masters? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 15(2), 185–214.
33. Meisiek, S., & Hatch, M. J. (2008). This is work, this is play: Artful interventions and identitydynamics. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches inmanagement and organization (pp. 412–422). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
34. Mienczakowski, J. (1995). The theater of ethnography: The reconstructing of ethnography in to theater with emancipatory potential. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 360–375.
35. Mienczakowski, J., & Morgan, S. (2001). Ethnodrama: constructing participatory, experientaland compelling action research through performance. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 176–184). London: Sage Publications.
36. Mienczakowski, J., Smith, R., & Sinclair, M. (1996). On the road to catharsis: A theoreticalframework for change. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(4), 439–462.
37. Newell, S., Robertson, M., & Swan, J. (2002). Interactive innovation processes and the problemsof managing knowledge. In B. Renzl, K. Matzler, & H. Hinterhuber (Eds.), The future of knowledge management (pp. 115–136). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38. Nicolini, D., Sher, M., Childerstone, S., & Gorli, M. (2004). In search of the ‘structure that reflects’: promoting organizational reflection practices in a UK health authority. In M. Reynolds & R. Vince (Eds.), Organizing reflection (pp. 81–104). Aldershot: Ashgate.
39. Parker, M. (1995). Critique in the name of what–Postmodernism and critical approaches toorganization. Organization Studies, 16, 553–564.
40. Parker, M. (2002). Against management. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
41. Pässilä, A., & Oikarinen, T. (forthcoming). Research-based theatre as a facilitator for organizationallearning. In P. Meusburger, & A. Berthoin-Antal (Eds.), Knowledge in organizations–learning organizations. Vol. 6 of the series Knowledge and Space. Heidelberg: Springer.
42. Raelin, J. A. (2001). Public reflection as the basis of learning. Management Learning, 32(1), 11–30.
43. Reynolds, M. (1998). Reflection and critical reflection in management learning. Management Learning, 29(2), 183–200.
44. Reynolds, M., & Vince, R. (2004a). Critical management education and action-based learning: synergies and contradictions. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(4), 442–456.
45. Reynolds, M., & Vince, R. (Eds.). (2004b). Organizing reflection. Aldershot: Ashgate.
46. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
47. Van de Ven, A., & Johnson, P. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.
48. Vince, R. (1998). Behind and beyond Kolb’s learning cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 304–319.
49. Vince, R. (2002). Organizing reflection. Management Learning, 33(1), 63–78.
50. Vince, R. (2004). Rethinking strategic learning. London: Routledge.
51. Vince, R., & Reynolds, M. (2009). Reflection, reflective practice and organizing reflection. In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development. London: SAGE.