Surface wetting: Characterization, contact angle, and fundamentals

Surface Wetting: Characterization, Contact Angle, and Fundamentals

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-162

  Law, Kock Yee ^a   Zhao, Hong ^b  

^a Founder and CEO at Research and Innovative Solutions   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGLE MEASUREMENT; CONTACT ANGLE; REVIEWS;

DATA INTERPRETATION; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; RESEARCH TRENDS; STANDARD PROTOCOLS; SURFACE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERINGS; SURFACE WETTING;

WETTING;

EID: 84956714546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25214-8     Document Type: Book

References (404)

1. Kim J, Moon MW, Lee KR, Mahadevan L, Kim HY (2011) Hydrodynamics of writing with ink. Phys Rev Lett 107:264501
2. Bruzewicz DA, Reches M, Whitesides GM (2008) Low-cost printing of PDMS barriers to define microchannels in paper. Anal Chem 80:3387–3392
3. Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM (2008) Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19606–19611
4. Paso K, Kompalla T, Aske N, Ronningsen HD, Oye G, Sjoblom J (2009) Novel surfaces with applicability for preventing wax deposition: a review. J Dispersion Sci Technol 30:757–781
5. Katano Y, Tomono H, Nakajima T (1994) Surface property of polymer films with fluoroalkyl side chains. Macromolecules 27:2342–2344
6. Samuel B, Zhao H, Law KY (2011) Study of wetting and adhesion interactions between water and various polymer and superhydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem C 115:14852–14861
7. Dejidas LP Jr, Destree TM (2006) Sheetfed offset press operating, 3rd edn. PIA-GATF Press, Pittsburgh, Chapter 6
8. Perelaer J, Smith PJ, Mager D, Soltman D, Volkman SK, Subramanian V, Korvink JG, Schubert US (2010) Printed electronics: the challenges involved in printing devices, interconnects, and contacts based on inorganic materials. J Mater Chem 20:8446–8453
9. Zielke D, Hubler AC, Hahn U, Brandt N, Bartzsch M (2005) Polymer-based organic fi eldeffect transistor using off-set printed source-drain structures. Appl Phys Lett 87:123508
10. Kang B, Lee WH, Cho K (2013) Recent advances in organic transistor printing processes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2302–2315
11. Fukuda K, Sekine T, Kumake D, Tokito S (2013) Profi le control of inkjet printed silver electrodes and their application to organic transistors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:3916–3920
12. Schuppert A, Thielen M, Reinhold J, Schmidt WA, Schoeller F, Osnabruck O (2011) Ink jet printing of conductive silver tracks from nanoparticle inks on mesoporous substrates. NIP27 and digital fabrication Technical Programs and Proceeding. pp 437–440
13. Wu Y (2011) Inkjet printed silver electrodes for organic thin film transistors. NIP27 and digital fabrication Technical Programs and Proceeding. pp 441–444
14. Zipperer D (2011) Printed electronic for flexible applications. NIP27 and digital fabrication Technical Programs and Proceeding. pp 452–453
15. Simske S, Aronoff JS, Duncan B (2011) Printed antennas for combined RFID and 2D barcodes. NIP27 and digital fabrication Technical Programs and Proceeding. pp 544–547
16. Sanz V, Bautista RY, Feliu C, Roig Y (2011) Technical evolution of ceramic tile digital decoration. NIP27 and digital fabrication Technical Programs and Proceeding. pp 532–536
17. Nossent KJ (2011) A breakthrough high speed wide format print concept for textile. NIP27 and digital fabrication Technical Programs and Proceeding. p 556
18. Huson D (2011) 3D printing of ceramics for design concept molding. NIP27 and digital fabrication Technical Programs and Proceeding. pp 815–818
19. Arias AC, Mackenzie JD, McCulloch I, Pivnay J, Salleo A (2010) Materials and applications for large area electronics: solution-based approaches. Chem Rev 110:3–24
20. Habas SE, Platt HAS, van Hest MFAM, Ginley DS (2010) Low-cost inorganic solar cells: from ink to printed devices. Chem Rev 110:6571–6594
21. Deegan RD, Bakajin O, Dupont TF, Huber G, Nagel SR, Witter TA (1997) Capillary fl ow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature 389:827–829
22. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fl uids. Phil Trans R Soc London 95:65–87
23. Gao LC, McCarthy TJ (2009) An attempt to correct the faulty intuition perpetuated by the Wenzel and Cassie “Laws”. Langmuir 25:7249–7255
24. Gao LC, McCarthy TJ (2009) Wetting 101°. Langmuir 25:14105–14115
25. Pease DC (1945) The signifi cance of the contact angle in relation to the solid surface. J Phys Chem 49:107–110
26. Morra M, Occhiello E, Garbossi F (1990) Knowledge about polymer surfaces from contact angle measurements. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 32:79–116
27. Kwok DY, Neumann AW (1999) Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation. Adv Colloid Interfacial Sci 81:167–249
28. Marmur A (2006) Soft contact. Measurement and interpretation of contact angles. Soft Matter 2:12–17
29. Strobel M, Lyons SL (2011) An essay on contact angle measurements. Plasma Process Polym 8:8–13
30. Bartell FE, Wooley AD (1933) Solid–liquid–air contact angles and their dependence upon the surface condition of the solid. J Am Chem Soc 55:3518–3527
31. Bartell FE, Hatch GB (1934) Wetting characteristics of galena. J Phys Chem 39:11–24
32. Fox HW, Zisman WA (1950) The spreading of liquids on low energy surfaces. 1. Polytetrafl uoroethylene. J Colloid Sci 5:514–531
33. Good RJ (1977) Free energy of solids and liquids: thermodynamics, molecular forces, and structure. J Colloid Interface Sci 59:398–419
34. Decker EL, Frank B, Suo Y, Garoff S (1999) Physics of contact angle measurement. Colloids Surf A 156:177–189
35. Drelich J (2013) Guidelines to measurements of predictable contact angles using a sessile-drop technique. Surf Innov 1:248–254
36. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil Trans R Soc London 95:65–87
37. Pease DC (1945) The significance of the contact angle in relation to the solid surface. J Phys Chem 49:107–110
38. Morra M, Occhiello E, Garbossi F (1990) Knowledge about polymer surfaces from contact angle measurements. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 32:79–116
39. Rayleigh L (1890) On the tension of water surfaces, clean and contaminated, investigated by the method of ripples. Phil Mag 30:386–400
40. Bartell FE, Wooley AD (1933) Solid–liquid–Air contact angles and their dependence upon the surface condition of the solid. J Am Chem Soc 55:3518–3527
41. Marmur A, Bittoun E (2009) When Wenzel and Cassie are right: reconciling local and global considerations. Langmuir 25:1277–1281 http://www.ramehart.com/newsletters/2007-12_news.htm
42. Bartell FE, Hatch GB (1934) Wetting characteristics of galena. J Phys Chem 39:11–24
43. Zisman WA (1964) Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes F (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–51
44. Good RJ (1977) Surface free energy of solids and liquids. Thermodynamics, molecular forces, and structures. J. Colloid Interface Sci 59:398–419
45. Drelich JW (2013) Guidelines to measurements of reproducible contact angles using a sessile-drop technique. Surf Innov 1:248–254
46. Shuttleworth R, Bailey GJ (1948) The spreading of a liquid over a rough surface. Discuss Faraday Soc 3:16–22
47. Zhao H, Law KY, Sambhy V (2011) Fabrication, surface properties and origin of superoleophobicity for a model textured surface. Langmuir 27:5927–5935
48. Crittenden JC, Trussell RR, Hand DW, Howe KJ, Tchobanoglous G (2012) MWH’s water treatment: principles and design, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
49. Extrand CW, Moon SI (2010) When sessile drop Are No longer small: transitions from spherical to fully flattened. Langmuir 25:11815–11822
50. Kranias S Effect of drop volume on static contact angles. Technical note 310e. Kruss GmbH, France
51. Marmur A (2006) Soft contact: measurement and interpretation of contact angles. Soft Matter 2:12–17
52. Extrand CW, Moon SI (2010) Contact angles of liquid drops on super hydrophobic surfaces: understanding the role of flattening of drops. Langmuir 26:17090–17099
53. Zhang X, Shi F, Niu J, Jiang Y, Wang Z (2008) Superhydrophobic surfaces: from structural control to functional application. J Mater Chem 18:621–633
54. Srinivasan S, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2011) Assessing the accuracy of contact angle measurements for sessile drops on liquid-repellent surfaces. Langmuir 27:13582–13589
55. Bashforth F, Adam JC (1883) An attempt to test the theories of capillary action by comparing the theoretical and measured forces of drops of fluid. University Press, Cambridge, UK
56. Amirfazli A, Kwok DY, Gaydos J, Neumann AW (1998) Line tension measurements through drop size dependence of contact angle. J Colloid Interface Sci 205:1–11
57. Marmur A (1997) Line tension and the intrinsic contact angle in solid–liquid–fluid systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 186:462–466
58. Cansoy CE (2014) The effect of drop size on contract angle measurements of superhydrophobic surfaces. RSC Adv 4:1197–1203
59. Woodward RP contact angle measurements using the drop shape method. http://firsttenangstroms.com/pdfdocs/CAPaper.pdf
60. Mack GL (1935) The determination of contact angles from measurements of the dimensions of small bubbles and drops. I. The spheroidal segment method for acute angles. J Phys Chem 40:159–167
61. Mark GL, Lee DA (1935) The determination of contact angles from measurements of the dimensions of small bubbles and drops II. The sessile drop method for obtuse angles. J Phys Chem 40:169–176
62. Neumann AW, Good RJ (1979) Techniques of measuring contact angles. Springer, Surface and Colloid Science, pp 31–91
63. Sklodowska A, Wozniak M, Matlakowska R (1999) The method of contact angle measurements and estimation of work of adhesion in bioleaching of metals. Biol Proc Online 1:114–121
64. Lubarda VA, Talke KA (2011) Analysis of the equilibrium droplet shape based on an ellipsoidal droplet model. Langmuir 27:10705–10713
65. Rotenberg Y, Boruvka L, Neumann AW (1983) Determination of surface tension and contact angle from the shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 93:169–183
66. del Rio OI, Neumann AW (1997) Axisymmetric drop shape analysis: computational methods for the measurement of interfacial properties from the shape and dimensions of pendant and sessile drops. J Colloid Interface Sci 196:136–147
67. Skinner FK, Rotenberg Y, Neumann AW (1989) Contact angle measurements from the contact diameter of sessile drops by means of a modified axisymmetric drop shape analysis. J Colloid Interface Sci 130:25–34
68. Moy E, Cheng P, Policova Z, Treppo S, Kwok D, Mack DR, Sherman PM, Neumann AW (1991) Measurement of contact angles from the maximum diameter of Non-wetting drops by means of a modified axisymmetric drop shape analysis. Colloids Surf 58:215–227
69. Kalantarian A, David R, Neumann AW (2009) Methodology for high accuracy contact angle measurement. Langmuir 25:14146–14154
70. del Rio OI, Kwok DY, Wu R, Alvarez JM, Neumann AW (1998) Contact angle measurements by axisymmetric drop shape analysis and an automated polynomial fit program. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 143:197–210
71. Bateni A, Susnar SS, Amirfazli A, Neumann AW (2003) A high-accuracy polynomial fitting approach to determine contact angles. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 219:215–231
72. Stalder AF, Kulik G, Sage D, Barbieri L, Hoffmann P (2006) A snake-based approach to accurate determination of both contact points and contact angles. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 286:92–103
73. Xu ZN (2014) An algorithm for selecting the most accurate protocol for contact angle measurement by drop shape analysis. Rev Sci Instrum 85:125107
74. Xu ZN, Wang SY (2015) A highly accurate dynamic contact angle algorithm for drops on inclined surface based on ellipse-fitting. Rev Sci Instrum 86:025104
75. Zhang X, Shi F, Yu X, Liu H, Fu Y, Wang Z, Jiang J, Li X (2004) Polyelectrolyte multilayer as matrix for electrochemical deposition of gold clusters: toward super-hydrophobic surface. J Am Chem Soc 126:3064–3065
76. Zhang W, Hallstrom B (1990) Membrane characterization using contact angle technique 1. Methodology of the captive bubble technique. Desalination 70:1–12
77. Drelich J, Miller JD, Good RJ (1996) The effect of drop (bubble) size on advancing and receding contact angles for heterogeneous and rough solid surfaces as observed with sessile-drop and captive-bubble techniques. J Colloid Interface Sci 179:37–50
78. Furmidge CGL (1962) Studies at phase interfaces The sliding of liquid drops on solid surfaces and a theory for spray retention. J Colloid Interface Sci 17:309–324
79. Pierce E, Carmona FJ, Amirfazli A (2008) Understanding of sliding and contact angle results in tilted plate experiments. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 323:73–82
80. Murase H, Nanishi K, Kogure H, Fujibayashi T, Tamura K, Haruta N (1994) Interaction between heterogeneous surfaces of polymers and water. J Appl Poly Sci 54:2051–2062
81. Rios PF, Dodiuk H, Kenig S, McCarthy S, Dotan A (2007) The effect of polymer surface on the wetting and adhesion of liquid systems. J Adhesion Sci Technol 3–4:227–242
82. Macdougall G, Ockrent C (1942) Surface energy relations in liquid/solid systems. The adhesion of liquids to solids and a new method of determining the surface tension of liquids. Proc R Soc Lond A 180:151–173
83. Krasovitski B, Marmur A (2005) Drops down the hill. Theoretical study of limiting contact angles and the hysteresis range on a tilted plate. Langmuir 21:3881–3885
84. Wilhelmy L (1863) Ueber die Abhängigkeit der Capillaritäts-Constanten des Alkohols von Substanz und Gestalt des benetzten festen Körpers. Ann Phys 119:117–217
85. Wilhelmy Plate, Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelmy_plate
86. Liakos IL, Newman RC, McAlpine E, Alexander MR (2007) A study of the resistance of SAMs on aluminum to acidic and basic solutions using dynamic contact angle measurements. Langmuir 23:995–999
87. Martin DA, Vogler EA (1991) Immersion depth independent computer analysis of Wilhelmy balance hysteresis curves. Langmuir 7:422–429
88. Lander LM, Siewierski LM, Brittain WJ, Vogler EA (1993) A systematic comparison of contact angle methods. Langmuir 9:2237–2239
89. Kanungo M, Mettu S, Law KY, Daniel S (2014) Effect of roughness geometry on wetting and de-wetting of PDMS surfaces. Langmuir 30:7358–7368
90. Hayes RA, Ralston J (1993) Force liquid movement on low energy surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 159:429–438
91. Kleingartner JA, Srinivasan S, Mabry JM, Cohen RE, McKinley GH (2013) Utilizing dynamic tensiometry to quantify contact angle hysteresis and wetting transitions on nonwetting surfaces. Langmuir 29:13396–13406
92. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil Trans R Soc London 95:65–87
93. Zisman WA (1964) Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes F (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–51
94. Shuttleworth R, Bailey GJ (1948) The spreading of a liquid over a rough surface. Discuss Faraday Soc 3:16–22
95. Bertrand E, Blake TD, De Coninck J (2009) Influence of solid-liquid interactions on dynamic wetting: a molecular dynamics study. J Phys Condens Matter 21:464124
96. Duvivier D, Blake TD, De Coninck J (2013) Towards a predictive theory of wetting dynamic. Langmuir 29:10132–10140
97. De Coninck J, Blake TD (2008) Wetting and molecular dynamics simulations of simple liquids. Annu Rev Mater Res 38:1–22
98. Seveno D, Vaillant A, Rioboo R, Adao H, Conti J, De Coninck J (2009) Dynamics of wetting revisited. Langmuir 25:13034–13044
99. Ruijter MJ, Blake TD, De Coninck J (1999) Dynamic wetting studies by molecular modeling simulations of droplet spreading. Langmuir 15:7836–7847
100. Bonn D, Eggers J, Indekeu J, Meunier J, Rolley E (2009) Wetting and spreading. Rev Modern Phys 81:739–805
101. Ray S, Sedev R, Priest C, Ralston J (2008) Influence of the work of adhesion on the dynamic wetting of chemically heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 24:13007–13012
102. Vega MJ, Gouttiere C, Seveno D, Blake TD, Voue M, De Coninck J, Clark A (2007) Experimental investigation of the link between static and dynamic wetting by forced wetting of nylon filament. Langmuir 23:10628–10634
103. Blake TD, De Coninck J (2002) The influence of solid-liquid interactions on dynamic wetting. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 96:21–36
104. Voinov OV (1976) Hydrodynamic of wetting. Fluid Dyn 11:714–721
105. Cox RG (1986) The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Fluid Mech 16:169–194
106. Vega MJ, Seveno D, Lemaur G, Adao MH, De Coninck J (2005) Dynamics of the rise around a fiber: experimental evidence of the existence of several time scales. Langmuir 21:9584–9590
107. Ranabothu SR, Karnezis C, Dai LL (2005) Dynamic wetting: hydrodynamic or molecular kinetic? J Colloid Interface Sci 288:213–221
108. Bartell FE, Wooley AD (1933) Solid-liquid-air contact angles and their dependence upon the surface condition of the solid. J Am Chem Soc 55:3518–3527
109. Macdougall G, Ockrent C (1942) Surface energy relations in liquid/solid systems. The adhesion of liquids to solids and a new method of determining the surface tension of liquids. Proc R Soc Lond A 180:151–173
110. Pease DC (1945) The significance of the contact angle in relation to the solid surface. J Phys Chem 49:107–110
111. Fowkes FM, Harkins WD (1940) The state of monolayers adsorbed at the interface solid-aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc 62:3377–3386
112. Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Morra M, Siboni S (2002) The determination of a ‘stable-equilibrium’ contact angle on a heterogeneous and rough surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206:47–67
113. Meiron TS, Marmur A, Saguy IS (2004) Contact angle measurement on rough surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 274:637–644
114. Smith T, Lindberg G (1978) Effect of acoustic energy on contact angle measurements. J Colloid Interface Sci 66:363–366
115. Andrien C, Sykes C, Brochard F (1994) Average spreading parameter on heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 10:2077–2080
116. Decker EL, Gareff S (1996) Using vibrational noise to probe energy barrier producing contact angle hysteresis. Langmuir 12:2100–2110
117. Cwikel D, Zhao Q, Liu C, Su X, Marmur A (2010) Comparing Contact angle measurements and surface tension assessments of solid surfaces. Langmuir 26:15289–15294
118. Johnson RG, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis III. Study of an idealized heterogeneous surface. J Phys Chem 68:1740–1750
119. Neumann AW, Good RJ (1972) Thermodynamics of contact angles Heterogeneous solid surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 38:341–358
120. Long J, Hyder MN, Huang RYM, Chen P (2005) Thermodynamic modeling of contact angles on rough heterogeneous surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 118:173–190
121. Mettu S, Chaudhury MK (2010) Stochastic relaxation of the contact line of a water droplet on a solid substrate subjected to white noise vibration: role of hysteresis. Langmuir 26:8131–8140
122. Dupre A (1869) Theorie mechanique de la chaleur. Gauthier-Villars, Pairs, p 369
123. Gray VR (1965) Surface aspects of wetting and adhesion. Chem Ind 23:969–977
124. Bartell FE, Shepard JW (1953) Surface roughness as related to hysteresis of contact angles. II. The systems of paraffin-3 molar calcium chloride solution-air and paraffin-glycerol-air. J Phys Chem 57:455–458
125. Johnson RE (1959) Conflicts between Gibbsian thermodynamics and recent treatments of interfacial energies in solid-liquid-vapor systems. J Phys Chem 63:1655–1658
126. Extrand CW (2003) Contact angles and hysteresis on surfaces with chemical heterogeneous Islands. Langmuir 19:3793–3796
127. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23:3762–3765
128. Bormashenko EA (2009) Variation approach of wetting of composite surfaces: is wetting of composite surfaces a one-dimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon? Langmuir 25:10451–10454
129. Chhatre SS, Guardado JO, Moore BM, Haddad TS, Mabry JM, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2010) Fluoroalkylated silicon-containing surface—estimation of solid surface energy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:3544–3554
130. Kang B, Lee WH, Cho K (2013) Recent advances in organic transistor printing processes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2302–2315
131. Fukuda K, Sekine T, Kumake D, Tokito S (2013) Profile control of inkjet printed silver electrodes and their application to organic transistors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:3916–3920
132. Arias AC, Mackenzie JD, McCulloch I, Pivnay J, Salleo A (2010) Materials and applications for large area electronics solution-based approaches. Chem Rev 110:3–24
133. Mettu S, Kanungo M, Law KY (2013) Anomalous thermally induced pinning of a liquid drop on a solid substrate. Langmuir 49:10665–10673
134. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988–994
135. Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551
136. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23:3762–3765
137. McHale G (2007) Cassie and Wenzel: were they really so wrong? Langmuir 23:8200–8205
138. Nosonovsky M (2007) On the range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie equations. Langmuir 23:9919–9920
139. Panchagnula MV, Vedantam S (2007) Comment on how Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy. Langmuir 23:13242
140. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) Reply to “Comment on how Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy”. Langmuir 23:13243
141. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2009) An attempt to correct the faulty intuition perpetuated by the Wenzel and Cassie “Laws”. Langmuir 25:7249–7255
142. Pease DC (1945) The significance of the contact angle in relation to the solid surface. J Phys Chem 49:107–110
143. Bartell FE, Shepard JW (1953) Surface roughness as related to hysteresis of contact angles. II. The systems of paraffin-3 molar calcium chloride solution-air and paraffin-glycerol-air. J Phys Chem 57:455–458
144. Johnson RE (1959) Conflicts between Gibbsian thermodynamics and recent treatments of interfacial energies in solid-liquid-vapor systems. J Phys Chem 63:1655–1658
145. Gray VR (1965) Surface aspects of wetting and adhesion. Chem. Ind. 969–977
146. Extrand CW (2003) Contact angles and hysteresis on surfaces with chemical heterogeneous islands. Langmuir 19:3793–3796
147. Bormashenko EA (2009) Variation approach of wetting of composite surfaces: is wetting of composite surfaces a one-dimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon? Langmuir 25: 10451–10454
148. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2009) Wetting 101°. Langmuir 25:14105–14115
149. Meiron TS, Marmur A, Saguy IS (2004) Contact angle measurement on rough surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 274:637–644
150. Forsberg PSH, Priest C, Brinkmann M, Sedev R, Ralston J (2010) Contact line pinning on microstructured surfaces for liquids in the Wenzel state. Langmuir 26:860–865
151. Choi W, Tuteja A, Mabry JM, Cohen RE, McKinley GH (2009) A modified Cassie-Baxter relationship to explain contact angle hysteresis and anisotropy on non-wetting surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 339:208–216
152. Kanungo M, Mettu S, Law KY, Daniel S (2014) Effect of roughness geometry on wetting and dewetting of rough PDMS surfaces. Langmuir 30:7358–7368
153. Drelich J, Chibowski E (2010) Superhydrophilic and superwetting surfaces: definition and mechanisms of control. Langmuir 26:18621–18623
154. Priest C, Albrecht TWJ, Sedev R, Ralston J (2009) Asymmetric wetting hysteresis on hydrophobic microstructured surfaces. Langmuir 25:5655–5660
155. Papadopoulos P, Deng X, Mammen L, Drotlef DM, Battagliarin G, Li C, Mullen K, Landfester K, del Campo A, Butt HJ, Vollmer D (2012) Wetting on the microscale: shape of a liquid drop on a microstructured surface at different length scales. Langmuir 28:8392–8398
156. Dorrer C, Ruhe J (2006) Advancing and receding motion of droplets on ultrahydrophobic post surfaces. Langmuir 22:7652–7657
157. Hansson PM, Hormozan Y, Brandner BD, Linnros J, Claesson PM, Swerin A, Schoelkopf J, Gane PAC, Thormann E (2012) Effect of surface depressions on wetting and interactions between hydrophobic pore array surfaces. Langmuir 28:11121–11130
158. Anantharaju N, Panchagnula MV, Vedantam S, Neti S, Tatic-Lucic S (2007) Effect of three-phase contact line topology on dynamic contact angles on heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 23:11673–11676
159. Liu J, Mei Y, Xia R (2011) A New wetting mechanism based upon triple contact line pinning. Langmuir 27:196–200
160. Larsen ST, Taboryski RA (2009) Cassie-like Law using triple phase boundary line fractions for faceted droplets on chemically heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 25:1282–1284
161. Jopp J, Grll H, Yerushalmi-Rozen R (2004) Wetting behavior of water droplets on hydrophobic microtextures of comparable size. Langmuir 20:10015–10019
162. Mohammadi R, Wassink J, Amirfazli A (2004) Effect of surfactants on wetting of superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 20:9657–9662
163. Wu J, Zhang M, Wang X, Li S, Wen W (2011) A simple approach for local contact angle determination on a heterogeneous surface. Langmuir 27:5705–5708
164. Cwikel D, Zhao Q, Liu C, Su X, Marmur A (2010) Comparing contact angle measurements and surface tension assessments of solid surfaces. Langmuir 26:15289–15294
165. Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W (2008) Diversity of structure, morphology, and wetting of plant surfaces. Soft Matter 4:1943–1963
166. Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W (2009) Multifunctional surface structure of plants. An inspiration for biomimetics. Prog Mater Sci 54:137–178
167. Hasimoto K, Irie H, Fujishima A (2005) TiO2 photocatalysis: a historical overview and future prospect. Jpn J Appl Phys 44:8269–8285
168. Fujishima A, Zhang X, Tryk DA (2008) TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf Sci Rep 63:515–582
169. Ogawa T, Murata N, Yamazaki S (2003) Development of antifogging mirror coated with SiO2-ZrO2-colloidal SiO2 film by the Sol Gel process. J Sol-Gel Technol 27:237–238
170. Cebeci FC, Wu Z, Zhai L, Cohen RE, Rubner MF (2006) Nanoporosity driven superhydrophilicity: a means to create multifunctional antifogging coatings. Langmuir 22:2856–2862
171. Dong H, Ye P, Zhong M, Pietrasik J, Drumright R, Matyjaszewski K (2010) Superhydrophilic surfaces via polymer-SiO2 nanocomposites. Langmuir 26:15567–15573
172. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) The purity of sacred lotus or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8
173. Cheng YT, Rodak DE, Wong CA, Hayden CA (2006) Effects of micro and nano structures on the self-cleaning behaviour of lotus leaves. Nanotechnology 17:1359–1362
174. Ensikat EJ, Ditsche-Kuru P, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (2011) Superhydrophobicity in perfection: the outstanding properties of the lotus leaf. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2:152–161
175. Li W, Amirfazli A (2008) Hierarchical structures for natural superhydrophobic surfaces. Soft Matter 4:462–466
176. Liu HH, Zhang HY, Li W (2011) Thermodynamic analysis on wetting behavior of hierarchical structured superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 27:6260–6267
177. Su Y, Ji B, Zhang K, Hao H, Huang Y, Hwang K (2010) Nano to micro structural hierarchy is crucial for stable superhydrophobic and water-repellent surfaces. Langmuir 26:4984–4989
178. Yu Y, Zhao ZH, Zheng QS (2007) Mechanical and superhydrophobic stabilities of two scale surfacial structure of lotus leaves. Langmuir 23:8312–8316
179. Extrand CW (2011) Repellency of the lotus leaf: resistance of water intrusion under hydrostatic pressure. Langmuir 27:6920–6925
180. Bittoun E, Marmur A (2012) The role of multi-scale roughness in the lotus effect: is it essential for superhydrophobicity. Langmuir 28:13933–13942
181. Nosonovsky M (2007) Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interface. Langmuir 23:3157–3161
182. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2006) The lotus effect explained: two reasons why two length scale of topography are important. Langmuir 22:2966–2967
183. Luo C, Zheng H, Wang L, Fang H, Hu J, Fan C, Cao Y, Wang J (2010) Direct three-dimensional imaging of the buried interfaces between water and superhydrophobic surfaces. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:9145–9148
184. Cao L, Hu HH, Gao D (2007) Design and fabrication of micro-textures for inducing a superhydrophobic behavior on hydrophilic materials. Langmuir 23:4310–4314
185. Cheng YT, Rodak DE (2005) Is the lotus leaf superhydrophobic? Appl Phys Lett 85:144101
186. Boreyko JB, Chen CH (2009) Restoring superhydrophobicity of lotus leaves with vibration-induced dewetting. Phys Rev Lett 103:174502
187. Gao L, McCarthy TJ, Zhang X (2009) Wetting and superhydrophobicity. Langmuir 25:14100–14104
188. Law KY (2012) Nanostructured coatings, surfaces and film Surf Innovations 1:75–76
189. Law KY (2014) Definitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the basics right. J Phys Chem Lett 5:686–688
190. Liu K, Jiang L (2012) Bio-inspired self-cleaning surfaces. Annu Rev Mater Res 42:231–263
191. Yan YY, Gao N, Barthlott W (2012) Mimicking nature superhydrophobic surfaces and grasping the wetting process: a review on recent progress in preparing superhydrophobic surface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 169:80–105
192. Sas I, Gorga RE, Joines JA, Thoney KA (2012) Literature review on superhydrophobic surfaces produced by electrospinning. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 50:824–845
193. Nishimoto S, Bhushan B (2013) Bioinspired self-cleaning surfaces with superhydrophobicity, superoleophobicity, and superhydrophilicity. RSC Advances 3:671–690
194. Celia E, Darmanin T, de Givenchy ET, Amigoni S, Guttard F (2013) Recent advances in designing superhydrophobic surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 402:1–18
195. Drelich J, Marmur A (2013) Physics and applications of superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic surfaces and coatings. Surf Innovations 2:211–227
196. Oner D, McCarthy TJ (2000) Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effect of topography length scale on wettability. Langmuir 16:7777–7782
197. Furstner R, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Walzel P (2005) Wetting and self-cleaning properties of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 21:956–961
198. Martines E, Seunarine K, Morgan H, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CDW, Riehle MO (2005) Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns. Nano Lett 5:2097–2103
199. Byun D, Hong J, Saputra KJH, Lee YJ, Park HC, Byun BK, Lukes JR (2009) Wetting characteristics of insect wing surfaces. J Bionic Eng 6:63–70
200. Teare DOH, Spanos CG, Ridley P, Kinmond EJ, Roucoules V, Badyal JPS, Brewes SA, Coulson S, Willis C (2002) Pulsed plasma deposition of superhydrophobic nanospheres. Chem Mater 14:4566–4571
201. Darmainbin T, Guittard F (2011) Superhydrophobic fiber mats by electrodeposition of fluorinated poly(3,4-ethyleneoxythiathiophene). J Am Chem Soc 133:15627–15634
202. Greiner A, Wendorff JH (2007) Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibers. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:5670–5703
203. Ming W, Wu D, van Benthem R, de With G (2005) Superhydrophobic films from raspberry-like particles. Nano Lett 5:2298–2301
204. Ma M, Gupta M, Li Z, Zhai L, Gleason KK, Cohen RE, Rubner MF, Rutledge GC (2007) Decorated electrospun fibers exhibiting superhydrophobicity. Adv Mater 19:225–259
205. Steele A, Bayer I, Loth E (2009) Inherently superoleophobic nanocomposite coatings by spray atomization. Nano Lett 9:501–505
206. Wang J, Liu F, Chen H, Chen D (2009) Superhydrophobic behavior achieved from hydrophilic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 95:084104
207. Feng L, Song Y, Zhai J, Liu B, Xu J, Jiang L, Zhu D (2003) Creation of a superhydrophobic surface from an amphiphilic polymer. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:800–802
208. He B, Patankar NA, Lee J (2003) Multiple equilibrium droplets shapes as design criteria for rough hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 19:4999–5003
209. Bico J, Marzolin C, Quere D (1999) Pearl drops. Europhys Lett 47:220–226
210. Lafuma A, Quere D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater 2:458–460
211. Bormashenko E, Pogreb R, Whyman G, Bormashemko Y, Erlich M (2007) Vibration-induced Cassie-Wenzel transition on rough surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 90:201917
212. Bormashenko E, Pogreb R, Whyman G, Erlich M (2007) Resonance Cassie-Wenzel wetting transition for horizontally vibrated drops deposited on a rough surface. Langmuir 23: 12217–12221
213. Liu G, Fu L, Rode AV, Craig VSJ (2011) Water droplet motion control on superhydrophobic surfaces: exploiting the Wenzel-to-Cassie transition. Langmuir 27:2595–2600
214. Xue Y, Chu S, Lv P, Duan H (2012) Importance of hierarchical structures in wetting stability on submersed superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 28:9440–9450
215. Whyman G, Bormashenko E (2011) How to make the Cassie wetting state stable? Langmuir 27:8171–8176
216. Lee C, Kim CJ (2009) Maximizing the giant liquid slip on superhydrophobic microstructures by nanostructuring their sidewalls. Langmuir 25:12812–12818
217. Liu T, Sun W, Sun X, Ai H (2010) Thermodynamic analysis of the effect of hierarchical architecture of a superhydrophobic surface on a condensed drop state. Langmuir 26:14835–14841
218. Chen CH, Cai Q, Tsai C, Chen CC (2007) Dropwise condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces with two-tier roughness. Appl Phys Lett 90:173108
219. Tuteja A, Choi W, McKinley GH, Cohen RE, Rubner MF (2008) Design parameters for superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity. MRS Bull 33:752–758
220. Tuteja A, Choi W, Mabry JM, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2008) Omniphobic surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:18200–18205
221. Zhao H, Law KY, Sambhy V (2011) Fabrication, surface properties, and origin of superoleophobicity for a model textured surface. Langmuir 27:5927–5935
222. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, Mabry JM, Mazzella SA, Rutledge GC, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2007) Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318:1618–1622
223. Choi W, Tuteja A, Chhatre S, Mabry JM, Cohen RE, McKinley GH (2009) Fabrics with tunable oleophobicity. Adv Mater 21:2190–2195
224. Fujii T, Aoki Y, Habazaki H (2011) Fabrication of super-oil-repellent dual pillar surfaces with optimized pillar intervals. Langmuir 27:11752–11756
225. Cao L, Price TP, Weiss M, Gao D (2008) Super water- and oil-repellent surfaces on intrinsically hydrophilic and oleophilic porous silicon films. Langmuir 24:1640–1643
226. Ahuja A, Taylor JD, Lifton V, Sidorenko AA, Salamon TR, Lobaton EJ, Kolodner P, Krupenkin TN (2008) Nanonails. A simple geometrical approach to electrically tunable superlyophobic surfaces. Langmuir 24:9–14
227. Kumar RTR, Mogensen KB, Boggild P (2010) Simple approach to superamphiphobic overhang nanostructures. J Phys Chem C 114:2936–2940
228. Zhao H, Park CK, Law KY (2012) Effect of surface texturing on superoleophobicity, contact angle hysteresis, and “robustness”. Langmuir 28:14925–14934
229. Zheng Y, Gao X, Jiang L (2007) Directional adhesion of superhydrophobic butterfly wing. Soft Matter 3:178–182
230. Wu D, Wang JN, Wu SZ, Chen QD, Zhao S, Zhang H, Sun HB, Jiang L (2011) Three-level biomimetic rice-leaf surfaces with controllable anisotropic sliding. Adv Funct Mater 21:2927–2932
231. Yoshimitsue Z, Nakajima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K (2002) Effects of surface structure on the hydrophobicity and sliding behavior of water droplets. Langmuir 18:5818–5822
232. Xia D, Brueck SRJ (2008) Strongly anisotropic wetting on one-dimensional nanopatterned surfaces. Nano Lett 8:2819–2824
233. Xia D, He X, Jiang YB, Lopez GP, Brueck SRJ (2010) Tailoring anisotropic wetting properties on submicrometer-scale periodic grooved surfaces. Langmuir 26:2700–2706
234. Yang J, Rose FRA, Gadegaard N, Alexander MR (2009) Effect of sessile drop volume on wetting anisotropy observed on grooved surfaces. Langmuir 25:2567–2571
235. Zhao H, Law KY (2012) Directional self-cleaning superoleophobic surfaces. Langmuir 28: 11812–11818
236. Chu KH, Xiao R, Wang EN (2010) Uni-directional liquid spreading on asymmetric nanostructured surfaces. Nat Mater 9:413–417
237. Law KY, Zhao H (2015) Design principles for robust superoleophobicity and superhydrophobicity. In Ras R, Marmur A (eds) Non-wettable surfaces, Royal Society of Chemistry, to be published.
238. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:65–87
239. Rayleigh L (1890) On the tension of water surfaces, clean and contaminated, investigated by the method of ripples. Philos Mag 30:386–400
240. Bartell FE, Wooley AD (1933) Solid–liquid-air contact angles and their dependence upon the surface condition of the solid. J Am Chem Soc 55:3518–3527
241. Bartell FE, Hatch GB (1934) Wetting characteristics of Galena. J Phys Chem 39:11–24
242. Dupre A (1869) Theorie Mechanique de la Chaleur. Gauthier-Villars, Pairs, p 369
243. Gibbs JW (1928) Trans. Connecticut Acad. 1876–1878, 3; Collected Works, vol. Longmans, Green, New York
244. Shuttleworth R, Bailey GJ (1948) The spreading of a liquid over a rough surface. Discuss Faraday Soc 3:16–22
245. Morra M, Occhiello E, Garbossi F (1990) Knowledge about polymer surfaces from contact angle measurements. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 32:79–116
246. Joanny JF, de Gennes PG (1984) A model for contact angle hysteresis. J Chem Phys 81:552–561
247. Good RJ (1977) Surface free energy of solids and liquids: thermodynamics, molecular forces, and structures. J Colloid Interface Sci 59:398–418
248. Carre A, Shanahan MER (1995) Drop motion on an inclined plane and evaluation of hydrophobic treatment on glass. J Adhes 49:177–185
249. Bormashenko E, Bormashenko Y, Oleg G (2010) On the nature of the friction between nonstick droplets and solid substrates. Langmuir 26:12479–12482
250. Xiu Y, Zhu L, Hess DW, Wong CP (2008) Relationship between work of adhesion and contact angle hysteresis on superhydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem C 112:11403–11407
251. Lv C, Yang C, Hao P, Feng H, Zheng Q (2010) Sliding of water droplet on microstructured hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26:8704–8708
252. Ko YC, Ratner BD, Hoffman AS (1981) Characterization of hydrophilic-hydrophobic polymer surfaces by contact angle measurements. J Colloid Interface Sci 82:25–37
253. Morra M, Occhiello E, Garbassi F (1989) Contact angle hysteresis on oxygen plasma treated polypropylene surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 132:504–508
254. Tsibouklis J, Nevell TG (2003) Ultra-low surface energy polymers. The molecular design requirements. Adv Mater 15:647–650
255. Strohmeier BR (1993) Improving the wettability of aluminum foil with oxygen plasma treatment. In: Mittal KL (ed) Contact angle, wettability and adhesion. VSP BV, Zutphen, pp 453–468
256. Tsai YC, Chou CT, Penn LS (1993) Contact angle data and adhesive performance for smooth surfaces with attached molecular chains. In: Mittal KL (ed) Contact angle, wettability and adhesion. VSP BV, Zutphen, pp 729–737
257. Murase H, Fujibayashi T (1997) Characterization of molecular interfaces in hydrophobic systems. Prog Org Coat 31:97–104
258. Rios PF, Dodiul H, Kenig S, McCarthy S, Dotan A (2007) The effect of polymer surface on the wetting and adhesion of liquid systems. J Adhes Sci Technol 3–4:227–241
259. Jao SHE, Chen JH, Shifley JD, Aslam M, Pavlisko JA (2009) Electrophotographic apparatus. US Patent 7,565,091
260. Hasebe S (2008) Numerical simulation of the toner melting behavior in fuser nip considering toner rheology. NIP24 and Digital Fabrication Final Program and Proceedings, Pittsburgh, pp 519–522
261. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2008) Teflon is hydrophilic. Comments on definitions of hydrophobic, shear versus tensile hydrophobicity and wetting characterization. Langmuir 24:9183–9188
262. Mittal KL (ed) (1993) Contact angle, wettability and adhesion. VSP BV, Zutphen
263. Samuel B, Zhao H, Law KY (2011) Study of wetting and adhesion interactions between water and various polymer and superhydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem C 115:14852–14861
264. Extrand CW, Kumaga Y (1995) Liquid drops on an inclined plane. The relationship between contact angles, drop shape, and retention force. J Colloid Interface Sci 170:515–521
265. Extrand CW, Gent AN (1990) Retention of liquid drops by solid surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 138:431–442
266. Furmidge CGL (1962) Studies at phase interfaces I. The sliding of liquid drops on solid surfaces and a theory for spray retention. J Colloid Sci 17:309–324
267. Macdougall G, Ockrent C (1942) Surface energy relations in liquid/solid systems. The adhesion of liquids to solids and a new method of determining the surface tension of liquids. Proc R Soc Lond A 180:151–173
268. Antonini C, Carmona FJ, Pierce E, Marengo M, Amirfazli A (2009) General methodology for evaluating the adhesion force of drops and bubbles on solid surfaces. Langmuir 25:6143–6154
269. Pierce E, Carmona FJ, Amirfazli A (2008) Understanding of sliding and contact angle results in tilted plate experiments. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 323:73–82
270. Krasovitski B, Marmur A (2005) Drops down the hill: theoretical study of limiting contact angles and the hysteresis range on a tilted plate. Langmuir 21:3881–3885
271. ElSherbini AI, Jacobi AM (2004) Liquid drops on vertical and inclined surfaces An experimental study of drop geometry. J Colloid Interface Sci 273:556–565
272. Della Volpe C, Siboni S, Morra M (2002) Comments on some recent papers on interfacial tension and contact angles. Langmuir 18:1441–1444
273. Cheng DF, Urata C, Masheder B, Hozumi A (2012) A physical approach to specifically improve the mobility of alkane liquid drops. J Am Chem Soc 134:10191–10199
274. Tadmor R, Bahadur P, Leh A, N’guessan HE, Jaini R, Dang L (2009) Measurement of lateral adhesion forces at the interface between a liquid drop and a substrate. Phys Rev Lett 103:266101
275. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2006) Contact angle hysteresis explained. Langmuir 22:6234–6237
276. McHale G, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2004) Contact angle hysteresis on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 20:10146–10149
277. Pease DC (1945) The significance of the contact angle in relation to the solid surface. J Phys Chem 49:107–110
278. Johnson RE, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis Study of an idealized rough surface. In: Fowkes F (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 112–135
279. Neumann AW, Good RJ (1972) Thermodynamic of contact angles Heterogeneous solid surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 38:341–358
280. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988–994
281. Forsberg PSH, Priest C, Brinkmann M, Sedev R, Ralston J (2010) Contact line pinning on microstructured surfaces for liquids in the Wenzel state. Langmuir 26:860–865
282. Extrand CW (2002) Model for contact angles and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir 18:7991–7999
283. Bartell FE, Bjorklund CW (1952) Hysteresis of contact angles. A study of interfacial contact angles in the mercury-benzene-water system. J Phys Chem 56:453–457
284. Chen YL, Helm CA, Israelachville JN (1991) Molecular mechanisms associated with adhesion and contact angle hysteresis of monolayer surfaces. J Phys Chem 95:10736–10747
285. Holly FJ, Refojo MF (1975) Wettability of hydrogels Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Biomed Mater Res 9:315–326
286. Lee S, Park JS, Lee TR (2008) The wettability of fluoropolymer surfaces: influence of surface dipoles. Langmuir 24:4817–4826
287. Extrand CW, Kumagai Y (1997) An experimental study of contact angle hysteresis. J Colloid Interface Sci 191:378–383
288. Zhao H, Park CK, Law KY (2012) Effect of surface texturing on superoleophobicity, contact angle hysteresis and “robustness”. Langmuir 28:14925–14934
289. Nosonovsky M (2007) Model for solid–liquid and solid–solid friction of rough surfaces with adhesion hysteresis. J Chem Phys 126:224701
290. Kanungo M, Mettu S, Law KY, Daniel S (2014) Effect of roughness geometry on wetting and de-wetting of PDMS surfaces. Langmuir 30:7358–7368
291. Law JBK, Ng AMH, He AY, Low HY (2014) Bioinspired ultrahigh water pinning nanostructures. Langmuir 30:325–331
292. Mettu S, Kanungo M, Law KY (2013) Anomalous thermally induced pinning of a liquid drop on a solid substrate. Langmuir 29:10665–10673
293. Koch K, Barehlott W (2009) Superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic plant surfaces: an inspiration for biomimetic materials. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 367:1487–1509
294. Zhao H, Law KY, Sambhy V (2011) Fabrication, surface properties, and origin of superoleophobicity for a model textured surface. Langmuir 27:5927–5935
295. Krumpfer JW, McCarthy TJ (2010) Contact angle hysteresis. A different view and a trivial recipe for low hysteresis hydrophobic surfaces. Faraday Discuss 146:103–111
296. Sambhy V, Law KY, Zhao H, Chugh S (2013) Thermally stable oleophobic low adhesion coating for inkjet printing front face. US Patent 8,544,987
297. Urata C, Cheng DF, Masheder B, Hozumi A (2012) Smooth, transparent and non-perfluorinated surfaces exhibiting unusual contact angle behavior towards organic liquids. RSC Adv 2:9805–9808
298. Kovacs GJ, Law KY, Zhao H, Sambhy V (2012) Coating for an ink jet printhead front face. U.S. Patent 8,226,207
299. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2008) Tefl on is hydrophilic. Comments on defi nitions of hydrophobic, shear versus tensile hydrophobicity and wetting characterization. Langmuir 24:9183–9188
300. Chen W, Fadeev AY, Hsieh MC, Oner D, Youngblood J, McCarthy TJ (1999) Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples. Langmuir 15:3395–3399
301. Krumpfer JW, McCarthy TJ (2010) Contact angle hysteresis: a different view and a trivial recipe for low hysteresis hydrophobic surfaces. Faraday Discuss 146:103–111
302. Cheng DF, Urata C, Masheder B, Hozumi A (2012) A physical approach to specifi cally improve the mobility of alkane liquid drops. J Am Chem Soc 134:10191–10199
303. Urata C, Cheng DF, Masheder B, Hozumi A (2012) Smooth, transparent and non perfluorinated surfaces exhibiting unusual contact angle behavior towards organic liquids. RSC Adv 2:9805–9808
304. Urata C, Masheder B, Cheng DF, Miranda DF, Dunderdale GJ, Miyamae T, Hozumi A (2014) Why can organic liquids move easily on smooth alky-terminated surfaces? Langmuir 30:4049–4255
305. Kovacs GJ, Law KY, Zhao H, Sambhy V (2012) Coating for an ink jet printhead front face. US Patent 8,226,207
306. Sambhy V, Law KY, Zhao H, Chugh S (2013) Thermally stable oleophobic low adhesion coating for inkjet printhead front face. US Patent 8,544,987
307. Sambhy V, Law KY, Zhao H, Chugh S (2014) Low adhesion sol gel coatings with high thermal stability for easy clean, self cleaning printhead front face applications. US Patent 8,851,163
308. Della Volpe C, Siboni S, Morra M (2002) Comments on some recent papers on interfacial tension and contact angles. Langmuir 18:1441–1444
309. Zisman WA (1964) Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes F (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–51
310. Langmuir I (1934) Mechanical properties of monomolecular films. J Franklin Inst 218:143–171
311. Schmidt DL, DeKoven BM, Coburn CE, Potter GE, Meyers GF, Fischer DA (1996) Characterization of a new family of nonwettable nonstick surfaces. Langmuir 12:518–529
312. van Oss CJ (1994) Interfacial forces in aqueous media. Marcel Dekker, New York
313. Vogler EA (1998) Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 74:69–117
314. Samuel B, Zhao H, Law KY (2011) Study of wetting and adhesion interactions between water and various polymer and superhydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem C 115:14852–14861
315. Law KY (2014) Defi nitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity and superhydrophobicity getting the basics right. J Phys Chem Lett 5:686–688
316. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fl uids. Philos Trans R Soc London 95:65–87
317. Roach P, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2008) Progress in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter 4:224–240
318. Forsberg PSH, Priest C, Brinkmann M, Sedev R, Ralston J (2010) Contact line pinning on microstructured surfaces for liquids in the Wenzel states. Langmuir 26:860–865
319. Law KY (2014) Superoleophobic surfaces. Surface properties, fabrication methods, and potential application. In: Lyshevski S (ed) Dekker encyclopedia of nanoscience and nanotechnology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, New York, p 4657
320. Bellanger H, Darmanin T, deGivenchy ET, Guittard F (2014) Chemical and physical pathways for the preparation of superoleophobic surfaces and related wetting theories. Chem Rev 114:2694–2716
321. Kota AK, Mabry JM, Tuteja A (2013) Superoleophobic surface design: design criteria and recent studies. Surf Innov 1:77–89
322. Liu K, Tian Y, Jiang L (2013) Bio-inspired superoleophobic and smart materials: design, fabrication, and application. Prog Mater Sci 58:503–564
323. Nishimoto S, Bhushan B (2013) Bioinspired self-cleaning surfaces with superhydrophobicity, superoleophobicity, and superhydrophilicity. RSC Adv 3:671–690
324. Law KY (2015) Water-surface interactions and defi nitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity and superhydrophobicity. Pure Appl Chem 87(8):759–765
325. Cuenot S, Fretigny C, Demoustier-Champagne S, Nysten B (2004) Surface tension effect on the mechanical properties of nanomaterials measured by atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 69:165410
326. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:65–87
327. Dupre A (1869) Theorie Mechanique de la Chaleur. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, p 369
328. Schrader ME (1995) Young-dupre revisited. Langmuir 11:3585–3589
329. Hui CY, Jagota A (2013) Surface tension, surface energy, and chemical potential due to their difference. Langmuir 29:11310–11316
330. Gray VR (1965) Surface aspects of wetting and adhesion. Chem Ind 23:969–977
331. Johnson RE (1959) Conflicts between Gibbsian thermodynamics and recent treatments of interfacial energies in solid–liquid-vapor systems. J Phys Chem 63:1655–1658
332. Fox HW, Zisman WA (1950) The spreading of liquids on low energy surfaces. I. Polytetrafluoroethylene. J Colloid Sci 5:514–531
333. Zisman WA (1964) Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes F (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–51
334. Ellison AH, Fox HW, Zisman AW (1953) Wetting of fluorinated solids by H-bonding liquids. J Phys Chem 57:622–627
335. Nishino T, Meguro M, Nakamae K, Matsushita M, Ueda Y (1999) The lowest surface free energy based on -CF3 alignment. Langmuir 15:4321–4323
336. Shafrin EG, Zisman WA (1960) Constitutive relations in the wetting of low energy surfaces and the theory of the retraction method of preparing monolayer. J Phys Chem 64:519–524
337. Chhatre SS, Guardado JO, Moore BM, Haddad TS, Mabry JM, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2010) Fluoroalkylated silicon-containing surfaces—estimation of solid-surface energy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:3544–3554
338. Fowkes FM (1962) Determination of interfacial tensions, contact angles, and dispersion forces in surfaces by assuming additivity of intermolecular interactions in surface. J Phys Chem 66:382
339. Fowkes FM (1964) Attractive forces at interfaces. Ind Eng Chem 56:40–52
340. Fowkes FM (1972) Donor-acceptor interactions at interfaces. J Adhes 4:155–159
341. Berthelot D (1898) Sur le mélange des gaz. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci 126:1857–1858
342. Good RJ (1992) Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: a critical review. J Adhes Sci Technol 6:1269–1302
343. Owens DK, Wendt RC (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13:1741–1747
344. Rabel W (1971) Einige Aspekte der Benetzungstheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Untersuchung und Veränderung der Oberflächeneigenschaften von Polymeren. Farbe und Lack 77:997–1005
345. Kaelble DH (1970) Dispersion-polar surface tension properties of organic solids. J Adhes 2:66–81
346. Janczuk B, Bialopiotrowicz T (1989) Surface free-energy components of liquids and low energy solids and contact angles. J Colloid Interface Sci 127:189–204
347. Kitazaki Y, Hata TJ (1972) Surface-chemical criteria for optimum adhesion. J Adhes 4:123–132
348. Van Oss CJ, Good RJ, Chaudhury MK (1986) The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in “hydrophobic interactions” between biopolymers and low energy surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 111:378–390
349. Van Oss CJ, Ju L, Chaudhury MK, Good RJ (1988) Estimation of the polar parameters of the surface tension of liquids by contact angle measurements on gels. J Colloid Interface Sci 128:313–319
350. van Oss CJ (2006) Interfacial forces in aqueous media. Taylor & Francis, New York
351. Kollman P (1977) A general analysis of noncovalent intermolecular interactions. J Am Chem Soc 99:4875–4894
352. Hobza P, Zahradnik R (1980) Weak intermolecular interactions in chemistry and biology. Elsevier, New York
353. Wu S (1971) Calculation of interfacial tension in polymer system. J Polym Sci C 34:19–30
354. Wu S (1973) Polar and nonpolar interactions in adhesion. J Adhes 5:39–55
355. Schultz J, Tsutsumi K, Donnet JB (1977) Surface properties of high-energy solids I. Determination of the dispersive component of the surface free energy of mica and its energy of adhesion to water and n-alkanes. J Colloid Interface Sci 59:272–277
356. Schultz J, Tsutsumi K, Donnet JB (1977) Surface properties of high-energy solids determination of the nondispersive component of the surface free energy of mica and its energy of adhesion to polar liquids. J Colloid Interface Sci 59:278–282
357. Sell PJ, Neumann AW (1966) The surface tension of solids. Angew Chem Int Ed 5:299–307
358. Neumann AW, Good RJ, Hope CJ, Sejpal M (1974) An equation-of-state approach to determine surface tensions of low-energy solids from contact angles. J Colloid Interface Sci 49:291–304
359. Li D, Neumann AW (1990) A reformulation of the equation of state for interfacial tensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 137:304–307
360. Kwok DY, Neumann AW (1999) Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 81:167–249
361. Kwok DY, Neumann AW (2000) Contact angle interpretation in terms of solid surface tension. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 161:31–48
362. Girifalco LA, Good RJ (1957) A theory for the estimation of surface and interfacial energies. I. Derivation and application to interfacial tension. J Phys Chem 61:904–909
363. Van Oss CJ, Good RJ, Chaudhury MK (1988) Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir 4:884–891
364. Fowkes FM, Riddle FL, Pastore WE, Weber AA (1990) Interfacial interactions between self-associated polar liquids and squalane used to test equations for solid–liquid interfacial interactions. Colloids Surf 43:367–387
365. Good RJ, Elbing E (1971) Generalization of theory for estimation of interfacial energies. Chem Phys Interfaces 2:72–96
366. Morrison I (1991) Does the phase rule for capillary systems really justify an equation of state for interfacial tensions? Langmuir 7:1833–1836
367. Zenkiewicz M (2007) Comparative study on the surface free energy of a solid calculated by different methods. Polym Test 26:14–19
368. Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Brugnara M, Siboni S, Morra M (2004) The solid surface free energy calculation I. In defense of the multicomponent approach. J Colloid Interface Sci 271:434–453
369. Siboni S, Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Brugnara M (2004) The solid surface free energy calculation II. The limits of the Zisman and of the “equation-of-state” approaches. J Colloid Interface Sci 271:454–472
370. Cwikel D, Zhao Q, Liu C, Su X, Marmur A (2010) Comparing contact angle measurements and surface tension assessments of solid surfaces. Langmuir 26:15289–15294
371. Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Morra M, Siboni S (2002) The determination of a “stable equilibrium” contact angle on heterogeneous and rough surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206:47–67
372. Samuel B, Zhao H, Law KY (2011) Study of wetting and adhesion interactions between water and various polymer and superhydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem C 115:14852–14861
373. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fl uids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:65–87
374. Zisman WA (1964) Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes F (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–51
375. Dupre A (1869) Theorie Mechanique de la Chaleur. Gauthier-Villars, Pairs, p 369
376. Gibbs JW (1928) Trans Connecticut Acad Arts Sci 1876–1878, 3; “Collected Works”, vol. 1. Longmans, Green, New York
377. Rayleigh L (1890) On the tension of water surfaces, clean and contaminated, investigated by the method of ripples. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 30:386–400
378. Pease DC (1945) The signifi cance of the contact angle in relation to the solid surface. J Phys Chem 49:107–110
379. Macdougall G, Ockrent C (1942) Surface energy relations in liquid/solid systems. The adhesion of liquids to solids and a new method of determining the surface tension of liquids. Proc R Soc Lond A 180:151–173
380. Bartell FE, Hatch GB (1934) Wetting characteristics of galena. J Phys Chem 39:11–24
381. Bartell FE, Wooley AD (1933) Solid-liquid-air contact angles and their dependence upon the surface condition of the solid. J Am Chem Soc 55:3518–3527
382. Johnson RE (1959) Confl icts between Gibbsian thermodynamics and recent treatments of interfacial energies in solid-liquid-vapor systems. J Phys Chem 63:1655–1658
383. Cwikel D, Zhao Q, Liu C, Su X, Marmur A (2010) Comparing contact angle measurements and surface tension assessments of solid surfaces. Langmuir 26:15289–15294
384. Meiron TS, Marmur A, Saguy IS (2004) Contact angle measurement on rough surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 274:637–644
385. Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Morra M, Siboni S (2002) The determination of a ‘stableequilibrium’ contact angle on a heterogeneous and rough surfaces. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206:47–67
386. Mettu S, Chaudhury MK (2010) Stochastic relaxation of the contact line of a water droplet on a solid substrate subjected to white noise vibration: role of hysteresis. Langmuir 26:8131–8140
387. Joanny JF, de Gennes PG (1984) A model for contact angle hysteresis. J Chem Phys 81:552–561
388. Johnson RE, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis Study of an idealized rough surfaces. In: Fowkes F (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 112–135
389. Neumann AW, Good RJ (1972) Thermodynamic of contact angles Heterogeneous solid surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 38:341–358
390. Chen YL, Helm CA, Israelachville JN (1991) Molecular mechanisms associated with adhesion and contact angle hysteresis of monolayer surfaces. J Phys Chem 95:10736–10747
391. Extrand CW, Kumagai Y (1997) An experimental study of contact angle hysteresis. J Colloid Interface Sci 191:378–383
392. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988–994
393. Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551
394. Forsberg PSH, Priest C, Brinkmann M, Sedev R, Ralston J (2010) Contact line pinning on microstructured surfaces for liquids in the Wenzel state. Langmuir 26:860–865
395. Kanungo M, Mettu S, Law KY, Daniel S (2014) Effect of roughness geometry on wetting and dewetting of rough PDMS surfaces. Langmuir 30:7358–7368
396. Choi W, Tuteja A, Mabry JM, Cohen RE, McKinley GH (2009) A modified Cassie-Baxter relationship to explain contact angle hysteresis and anisotropy on non-wetting surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 339:208–216
397. Nosonovsky M (2007) On the range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie equations. Langmuir 23:9919–9920
398. Samuel B, Zhao H, Law KY (2011) Study of wetting and adhesion interactions between water and various polymer and superhydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem C 115:14852–14861
399. Roach P, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2008) Progress in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter 4:224–240
400. Law KY (2014) Defi nitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the basic right. J Phys Chem Lett 5:686–688
401. Law KY (2015) Water interactions and defi nitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity. Pure Appl Chem 87(8):759–765
402. Good RJ (1977) Surface free energy of solids and liquids. Thermodynamics, molecular forces, and structures. J Colloid Interface Sci 59:398–419
403. Krasovitski B, Marmur A (2005) Drops down the hill. Theoretical study of limiting contact angles and the hysteresis range on a tilted plate. Langmuir 21:3881–3885
404. Pierce E, Carmona FJ, Amirfazli A (2008) Understanding of sliding and contact angle results in tilted plate experiments. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 323:73–82