A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy

European Urology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 149-156

  Baco, Eduard ^a,b   Rud, Erik ^a,b   Eri, Lars Magne ^a,b   Moen, Gunnar ^a   Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ^a   Svindland, Aud ^a   Eggesbø, Heidi B ^a,b   Ukimura, Osamu ^c  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Image guided biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Systematic random biopsy; Targeted biopsy; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FUSION GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TWELVE CORE RANDOM PROSTATE BIOPSY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEOPLASM GRADING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84955687678     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.041     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. A. Heidenreich, P.J. Bastian, J. Bellmunt, and et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer Eur Urol 65 2014 467 479
2. M.A. Bjurlin, H.B. Carter, P. Schellhammer, and et al. Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing J Urol 189 2013 2039 2046
3. S.L. Washington, M. Bonham, J.M. Whitson, and et al. Transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy does not reliably identify dominant cancer location in men with low-risk prostate cancer BJU Int 110 2011 50 55
4. C.M. Moore, N.L. Robertson, N. Arsanious, and et al. Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 2013 125 140
5. E. Rud, E. Baco, and H.B. Eggesbø MRI and ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using soft image fusion Anticancer Res 32 2012 3383 3389
6. J.O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, R. Clements, and et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 Eur Radiol 22 2012 746 757
7. F. Cornud, N.B. Delongchamps, P. Mozer, and et al. Value of multiparametric MRI in the work-up of prostate cancer Curr Urol Rep 13 2011 82 92
8. D. Portalez, P. Mozer, F. Cornud, and et al. Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients Eur Urol 62 2012 986 996
9. P. Mozer, M. Rouprêt, C. Le Cossec, and et al. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer BJU Int 115 2015 50 57
10. E. Baco, O. Ukimura, E. Rud, and et al. Magnetic Resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients Eur Urol 67 2015 787 794
11. T.H. van der Kwast, M.B. Amin, A. Billis, and et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume Modern Pathology 24 2010 16 25
12. C.M. Moore, V. Kasivisvanathan, S. Eggener, and et al. Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group Eur Urol 64 2013 544 552
13. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, C. Allen, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477 494
14. R.J. Babaian, A. Toi, K. Kamoi, and et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy J Urol 163 2000 152 157
15. M.M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, B. Turkbey, and et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 2015 390
16. V. Panebianco, F. Barchetti, A. Sciarra, and et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study Urol Oncol 33 2015 17.e1-7
17. M.R. Pokorny, M. de Rooij, E. Duncan, and et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies Eur Urol 66 2014 22 29
18. M. Quentin, D. Blondin, C. Arsov, and et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen J Urol 192 2014 1374 1379
19. O. Ukimura, J.A. Coleman, A. de la Taille de, and et al. Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care Eur Urol 63 2013 214 230
20. F.H. Schröder, J. Hugosson, M.J. Roobol, and et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up N Engl J Med 366 2012 981 990
21. M.S. Borofsky, A.B. Rosenkrantz, N. Abraham, and et al. Does suspicion of prostate cancer on integrated T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI predict more adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy? Urology 81 2013 1279 1283
22. E. Baco, E. Rud, O. Ukimura, and et al. Effect of targeted biopsy guided by elastic image fusion of MRI with 3D-TRUS on diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer Urol Oncol 32 2014 1300 1307
23. M.M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, H. Truong, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy Eur Urol 64 2013 713 719
24. J.S. Wysock, A.B. Rosenkrantz, W.C. Huang, and et al. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) Imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial Eur Urol 66 2014 343 351