Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: Correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients

European Urology

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 787-794

  Baco, Eduard ^a,b   Ukimura, Osamu ^b   Rud, Erik ^a   Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ^c   Svindland, Aud ^c   Aron, Manju ^b   Palmer, Suzanne ^b   Matsugasumi, Toru ^b   Marien, Arnaud ^b,d   Bernhard, Jean Christophe ^b,e   Rewcastle, John C ^b   Eggesbø, Heidi B ^f   Gill, Inderbir S ^b  

^a AKER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^f OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Cancer volume; Gleason score; Image fusion; Index tumor; Location; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SIZE; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CANCER GRADING; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

AGED; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84923072339     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.077     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M. Perera, N. Lawrentschuk, D. Bolton, and D. Clouston Comparison of contemporary methods for estimating prostate tumour volume in pathological specimens BJU Int 113 2014 29 34
2. I. Meiers, D.J. Waters, and D.G. Bostwick Preoperative prediction of multifocal prostate cancer and application of focal therapy: review 2007 Urology 70 2007 S3 S8
3. R. Arora, M.O. Koch, J.N. Eble, T.M. Ulbright, L. Li, and L. Cheng Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate Cancer 100 2004 2362 2366
4. W. Liu, S. Laitinen, and S. Khan Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer Nat Med 15 2009 559 565
5. S.L. Washington, M. Bonham, J.M. Whitson, J.E. Cowan, and P.R. Carroll Transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy does not reliably identify dominant cancer location in men with low-risk prostate cancer BJU Int 110 2011 50 55
6. M.C. Haffner, T. Mosbruger, and D.M. Esopi Tracking the clonal origin of lethal prostate cancer J Clin Invest 123 2013 4918 4922
7. C.M.A. Hoeks, J.O. Barentsz, and T. Hambrock Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging Radiology 261 2011 46 66
8. T. Hambrock, C. Hoeks, and C. Hulsbergen-van de Kaa Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort Eur Urol 61 2012 177 184
9. M.R. Pokorny, M. de Rooij, and E. Duncan Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies Eur Urol 2014 1 8
10. O. Ukimura, and I.S. Gill Targeted prostate biopsies for a histogram of the index lesion Curr Opin Urol 23 2013 118 122
11. N.B. Delongchamps, M. Peyromaure, and A. Schull Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies J Urol 189 2013 493 499
12. M. Baumann, P. Mozer, V. Daanen, and J. Troccaz Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation Med Image Anal 16 2012 562 576
13. E. Rud, E. Baco, and H.B. Eggesbø MRI and ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using soft image fusion. Anticancer Res 32 2012 3383 3389
14. D. Portalez, P. Mozer, and F. Cornud Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients Eur Urol 62 2012 986 996
15. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, and C. Allen Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477 494
16. J.O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, and R. Clements ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 Eur Radiol 22 2012 746 757
17. E. Rud, D. Klotz, K. Rennesund, E. Baco, V. Berge, and D. Lien Detection of the index tumor and tumor volume in prostate cancer using T2w and DW MRI alone BJU Int 114 2014 E32 E42
18. O. Ukimura, M.M. Desai, and S. Palmer 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion J Urol 187 2012 1080 1086
19. T.A. Stamey, F.S. Freiha, J.E. McNeal, E.A. Redwine, A.S. Whittemore, and H.P. Scmid Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer Cancer 71 3 Suppl 1993 933 938
20. T.H. van der Kwast, M.B. Amin, and A. Billis International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume Mod Pathol 24 2010 16 25
21. J.I. Epstein, W.C. Allsbrook, M.B. Amin, L.L. Egevad, and L.L. Egevad The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 29 2005 1228 1242
22. J.I. Epstein, H. Sanderson, H.B. Carter, and D.O. Scharfstein Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy Urology 66 2005 356 360
23. B. Turkbey, H. Mani, and O. Aras Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology J Urol 188 2012 1157 1163
24. F. Cornud, L. Brolis, and N.B. Delongchamps TRUS-MRI image registration: a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer Abdom Imaging 38 2013 1447 1463
25. L. Vyas, P. Acher, and J. Kinsella Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases BJU Int 114 2014 32 37
26. F. Cornud, G. Khoury, and N. Bouazza Tumor target volume for focal therapy of prostate cancer - does multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging allow for a reliable estimation? J Urol 191 2014 1272 1279
27. S. Isebaert, L. Van den Bergh, and K. Haustermans Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localization in correlation to whole-mount histopathology J Magn Reson Imaging 37 2012 1392 1401
28. P.C. Albertsen, J.A. Hanley, and J. Fine 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer JAMA 293 2005 2095 2101
29. R. Kvåle, B. Møller, and R. Wahlqvist Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study BJU Int 103 2009 1647 1654
30. M. Karavitakis, H.U. Ahmed, P.D. Abel, S. Hazell, and M.H. Winkler Margin status after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and the index lesion: implications for preoperative evaluation of tumor focality in prostate cancer J Endourol 26 2012 503 508